钉钉法测定混凝土强度的特点

S. I. Ivanov, A. Nevskii, D. Chesnokov
{"title":"钉钉法测定混凝土强度的特点","authors":"S. I. Ivanov, A. Nevskii, D. Chesnokov","doi":"10.37538/2224-9494-2022-2(33)-97-105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The method of determining concrete strength based on steel stud driving into concrete by firing has been used since the 1960s. At present, several institutions promote this method as an alternative to direct nondestructive testing methods (pullout test and shear angles) and propose to introduce it into the current standard GOST 22690-2015. Its availability and low cost compared to those of the existing standard methods are mentioned to substantiate this proposal.Aim. In this work, domestic and foreign studies and normative documents regulating the considered test method are analyzed, and its standardization and the volume of additional research are evaluated.Materials and methods. Theses from the mid-20th century to the present, normative documents (ASTM C803-02, BS 1881-207, DIN EN 14488-2), and instructions (Z-WP-534. Windsor Probe System, Driving method Hilti DX 450-SCT) were reviewed.Results. Significant limitations for the application and the factors having the most profound influence on the accuracy of the method were identified: hardness, type, and fineness of the filler, variation of firing charge power, and indenter parameters (driven stud). These factors have no influence on the control methods recommended by the existing standards. Foreign standards stipulate the application of this test method as an indirect technique, requiring adjustments based on the testing results of standard samples or test cores extracted from structures; however, no data on its accuracy is provided.Conclusion. Given the revealed limitations, it is premature to standardize the method. Further research is recommended. The statement about the significant availability and cheapness of the reviewed method relative to the standard regulated methods is unsubstantiated. ","PeriodicalId":169749,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Specific features of determining concrete strength by stud driving method\",\"authors\":\"S. I. Ivanov, A. Nevskii, D. Chesnokov\",\"doi\":\"10.37538/2224-9494-2022-2(33)-97-105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The method of determining concrete strength based on steel stud driving into concrete by firing has been used since the 1960s. At present, several institutions promote this method as an alternative to direct nondestructive testing methods (pullout test and shear angles) and propose to introduce it into the current standard GOST 22690-2015. Its availability and low cost compared to those of the existing standard methods are mentioned to substantiate this proposal.Aim. In this work, domestic and foreign studies and normative documents regulating the considered test method are analyzed, and its standardization and the volume of additional research are evaluated.Materials and methods. Theses from the mid-20th century to the present, normative documents (ASTM C803-02, BS 1881-207, DIN EN 14488-2), and instructions (Z-WP-534. Windsor Probe System, Driving method Hilti DX 450-SCT) were reviewed.Results. Significant limitations for the application and the factors having the most profound influence on the accuracy of the method were identified: hardness, type, and fineness of the filler, variation of firing charge power, and indenter parameters (driven stud). These factors have no influence on the control methods recommended by the existing standards. Foreign standards stipulate the application of this test method as an indirect technique, requiring adjustments based on the testing results of standard samples or test cores extracted from structures; however, no data on its accuracy is provided.Conclusion. Given the revealed limitations, it is premature to standardize the method. Further research is recommended. The statement about the significant availability and cheapness of the reviewed method relative to the standard regulated methods is unsubstantiated. \",\"PeriodicalId\":169749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2022-2(33)-97-105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2022-2(33)-97-105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。自20世纪60年代以来,测定混凝土强度的方法是基于钢钉通过燃烧打入混凝土的方法。目前,已有多家机构将该方法作为直接无损检测方法(拉拔试验和剪切角试验)的替代方法进行推广,并建议将其纳入现行标准GOST 22690-2015中。与现有的标准方法相比,它的可用性和低成本证明了这一建议。在本工作中,分析了国内外研究和规范所考虑的测试方法的规范性文件,并对其标准化和额外的研究量进行了评价。材料和方法。论文从20世纪中期到现在,规范性文件(ASTM C803-02, BS 1881-207, DIN EN 14488-2),和说明(Z-WP-534。综述了温莎探针系统、驱动方法喜利得DX 450-SCT。确定了应用的重大限制和对方法精度影响最深远的因素:填料的硬度、类型和细度、点火功率的变化和压头参数(驱动螺柱)。这些因素对现行标准推荐的控制方法没有影响。国外标准规定该试验方法作为间接技术应用,要求根据从结构中提取的标准样品或试验岩心的试验结果进行调整;然而,没有提供关于其准确性的数据。鉴于所揭示的局限性,现在对该方法进行标准化还为时过早。建议进一步研究。与标准监管方法相比,所审查方法的显著可用性和廉价性的说法是没有根据的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Specific features of determining concrete strength by stud driving method
Introduction. The method of determining concrete strength based on steel stud driving into concrete by firing has been used since the 1960s. At present, several institutions promote this method as an alternative to direct nondestructive testing methods (pullout test and shear angles) and propose to introduce it into the current standard GOST 22690-2015. Its availability and low cost compared to those of the existing standard methods are mentioned to substantiate this proposal.Aim. In this work, domestic and foreign studies and normative documents regulating the considered test method are analyzed, and its standardization and the volume of additional research are evaluated.Materials and methods. Theses from the mid-20th century to the present, normative documents (ASTM C803-02, BS 1881-207, DIN EN 14488-2), and instructions (Z-WP-534. Windsor Probe System, Driving method Hilti DX 450-SCT) were reviewed.Results. Significant limitations for the application and the factors having the most profound influence on the accuracy of the method were identified: hardness, type, and fineness of the filler, variation of firing charge power, and indenter parameters (driven stud). These factors have no influence on the control methods recommended by the existing standards. Foreign standards stipulate the application of this test method as an indirect technique, requiring adjustments based on the testing results of standard samples or test cores extracted from structures; however, no data on its accuracy is provided.Conclusion. Given the revealed limitations, it is premature to standardize the method. Further research is recommended. The statement about the significant availability and cheapness of the reviewed method relative to the standard regulated methods is unsubstantiated. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Method of reinforcing defects in field welds of unique buildings and structures Features of a finite-element modeling of a tubular tower for a wind-power unit Half-precast “crossbar-slab-column” frame joint Normal section strength of eccentrically compressed reinforced concrete structures with loop reinforcement joints. Experimental studies Non-parametric data processing in experimental studies of spirally reinforced concrete samples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1