{"title":"钉钉法测定混凝土强度的特点","authors":"S. I. Ivanov, A. Nevskii, D. Chesnokov","doi":"10.37538/2224-9494-2022-2(33)-97-105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The method of determining concrete strength based on steel stud driving into concrete by firing has been used since the 1960s. At present, several institutions promote this method as an alternative to direct nondestructive testing methods (pullout test and shear angles) and propose to introduce it into the current standard GOST 22690-2015. Its availability and low cost compared to those of the existing standard methods are mentioned to substantiate this proposal.Aim. In this work, domestic and foreign studies and normative documents regulating the considered test method are analyzed, and its standardization and the volume of additional research are evaluated.Materials and methods. Theses from the mid-20th century to the present, normative documents (ASTM C803-02, BS 1881-207, DIN EN 14488-2), and instructions (Z-WP-534. Windsor Probe System, Driving method Hilti DX 450-SCT) were reviewed.Results. Significant limitations for the application and the factors having the most profound influence on the accuracy of the method were identified: hardness, type, and fineness of the filler, variation of firing charge power, and indenter parameters (driven stud). These factors have no influence on the control methods recommended by the existing standards. Foreign standards stipulate the application of this test method as an indirect technique, requiring adjustments based on the testing results of standard samples or test cores extracted from structures; however, no data on its accuracy is provided.Conclusion. Given the revealed limitations, it is premature to standardize the method. Further research is recommended. The statement about the significant availability and cheapness of the reviewed method relative to the standard regulated methods is unsubstantiated. ","PeriodicalId":169749,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Specific features of determining concrete strength by stud driving method\",\"authors\":\"S. I. Ivanov, A. Nevskii, D. Chesnokov\",\"doi\":\"10.37538/2224-9494-2022-2(33)-97-105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The method of determining concrete strength based on steel stud driving into concrete by firing has been used since the 1960s. At present, several institutions promote this method as an alternative to direct nondestructive testing methods (pullout test and shear angles) and propose to introduce it into the current standard GOST 22690-2015. Its availability and low cost compared to those of the existing standard methods are mentioned to substantiate this proposal.Aim. In this work, domestic and foreign studies and normative documents regulating the considered test method are analyzed, and its standardization and the volume of additional research are evaluated.Materials and methods. Theses from the mid-20th century to the present, normative documents (ASTM C803-02, BS 1881-207, DIN EN 14488-2), and instructions (Z-WP-534. Windsor Probe System, Driving method Hilti DX 450-SCT) were reviewed.Results. Significant limitations for the application and the factors having the most profound influence on the accuracy of the method were identified: hardness, type, and fineness of the filler, variation of firing charge power, and indenter parameters (driven stud). These factors have no influence on the control methods recommended by the existing standards. Foreign standards stipulate the application of this test method as an indirect technique, requiring adjustments based on the testing results of standard samples or test cores extracted from structures; however, no data on its accuracy is provided.Conclusion. Given the revealed limitations, it is premature to standardize the method. Further research is recommended. The statement about the significant availability and cheapness of the reviewed method relative to the standard regulated methods is unsubstantiated. \",\"PeriodicalId\":169749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2022-2(33)-97-105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2022-2(33)-97-105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
介绍。自20世纪60年代以来,测定混凝土强度的方法是基于钢钉通过燃烧打入混凝土的方法。目前,已有多家机构将该方法作为直接无损检测方法(拉拔试验和剪切角试验)的替代方法进行推广,并建议将其纳入现行标准GOST 22690-2015中。与现有的标准方法相比,它的可用性和低成本证明了这一建议。在本工作中,分析了国内外研究和规范所考虑的测试方法的规范性文件,并对其标准化和额外的研究量进行了评价。材料和方法。论文从20世纪中期到现在,规范性文件(ASTM C803-02, BS 1881-207, DIN EN 14488-2),和说明(Z-WP-534。综述了温莎探针系统、驱动方法喜利得DX 450-SCT。确定了应用的重大限制和对方法精度影响最深远的因素:填料的硬度、类型和细度、点火功率的变化和压头参数(驱动螺柱)。这些因素对现行标准推荐的控制方法没有影响。国外标准规定该试验方法作为间接技术应用,要求根据从结构中提取的标准样品或试验岩心的试验结果进行调整;然而,没有提供关于其准确性的数据。鉴于所揭示的局限性,现在对该方法进行标准化还为时过早。建议进一步研究。与标准监管方法相比,所审查方法的显著可用性和廉价性的说法是没有根据的。
Specific features of determining concrete strength by stud driving method
Introduction. The method of determining concrete strength based on steel stud driving into concrete by firing has been used since the 1960s. At present, several institutions promote this method as an alternative to direct nondestructive testing methods (pullout test and shear angles) and propose to introduce it into the current standard GOST 22690-2015. Its availability and low cost compared to those of the existing standard methods are mentioned to substantiate this proposal.Aim. In this work, domestic and foreign studies and normative documents regulating the considered test method are analyzed, and its standardization and the volume of additional research are evaluated.Materials and methods. Theses from the mid-20th century to the present, normative documents (ASTM C803-02, BS 1881-207, DIN EN 14488-2), and instructions (Z-WP-534. Windsor Probe System, Driving method Hilti DX 450-SCT) were reviewed.Results. Significant limitations for the application and the factors having the most profound influence on the accuracy of the method were identified: hardness, type, and fineness of the filler, variation of firing charge power, and indenter parameters (driven stud). These factors have no influence on the control methods recommended by the existing standards. Foreign standards stipulate the application of this test method as an indirect technique, requiring adjustments based on the testing results of standard samples or test cores extracted from structures; however, no data on its accuracy is provided.Conclusion. Given the revealed limitations, it is premature to standardize the method. Further research is recommended. The statement about the significant availability and cheapness of the reviewed method relative to the standard regulated methods is unsubstantiated.