J.E. Clague, P. Fields, D.R. Graham, P.D.O. Davies
{"title":"结核病筛查:医院工作人员目前的做法和态度","authors":"J.E. Clague, P. Fields, D.R. Graham, P.D.O. Davies","doi":"10.1016/0041-3879(91)90052-T","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To examine the current practices and attitudes of health workers to the prevention of tuberculosis in our 55-bed chest unit, we investigated the tuberculin reactor status, reviewed pre-employment screening and reviewed the action taken after contact with tuberculosis by staff members. We assessed all 61 staff members, including 44 nurses, 1 physiotherapist, 11 doctors and 5 domestic workers. <span><math><mtext>47</mtext><mtext>61</mtext></math></span> staff members had had BCG vaccination. Heaf testing revealed 3 Heaf-negative subjects and, of the remainder, 52 had grade 3 or stronger reactions. Only <span><math><mtext>3</mtext><mtext>11</mtext></math></span> doctors, <span><math><mtext>36</mtext><mtext>44</mtext></math></span> nurses and <span><math><mtext>4</mtext><mtext>5</mtext></math></span> domestic workers had had any pre-employment screening. No action was taken by any doctor after their last contact with tuberculosis, whereas <span><math><mtext>10</mtext><mtext>44</mtext></math></span> nurses and <span><math><mtext>3</mtext><mtext>5</mtext></math></span> domestic workers had had chest X-rays. This study shows the low importance with which the risk of tuberculosis is perceived, particularly by doctors and demonstrates the need for stricter supervision and improved quality of pre-employment screening.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23472,"journal":{"name":"Tubercle","volume":"72 4","pages":"Pages 265-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0041-3879(91)90052-T","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening for tuberculosis: current practices and attitudes of hospital workers\",\"authors\":\"J.E. Clague, P. Fields, D.R. Graham, P.D.O. Davies\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0041-3879(91)90052-T\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To examine the current practices and attitudes of health workers to the prevention of tuberculosis in our 55-bed chest unit, we investigated the tuberculin reactor status, reviewed pre-employment screening and reviewed the action taken after contact with tuberculosis by staff members. We assessed all 61 staff members, including 44 nurses, 1 physiotherapist, 11 doctors and 5 domestic workers. <span><math><mtext>47</mtext><mtext>61</mtext></math></span> staff members had had BCG vaccination. Heaf testing revealed 3 Heaf-negative subjects and, of the remainder, 52 had grade 3 or stronger reactions. Only <span><math><mtext>3</mtext><mtext>11</mtext></math></span> doctors, <span><math><mtext>36</mtext><mtext>44</mtext></math></span> nurses and <span><math><mtext>4</mtext><mtext>5</mtext></math></span> domestic workers had had any pre-employment screening. No action was taken by any doctor after their last contact with tuberculosis, whereas <span><math><mtext>10</mtext><mtext>44</mtext></math></span> nurses and <span><math><mtext>3</mtext><mtext>5</mtext></math></span> domestic workers had had chest X-rays. This study shows the low importance with which the risk of tuberculosis is perceived, particularly by doctors and demonstrates the need for stricter supervision and improved quality of pre-employment screening.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tubercle\",\"volume\":\"72 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 265-267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0041-3879(91)90052-T\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tubercle\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/004138799190052T\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tubercle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/004138799190052T","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Screening for tuberculosis: current practices and attitudes of hospital workers
To examine the current practices and attitudes of health workers to the prevention of tuberculosis in our 55-bed chest unit, we investigated the tuberculin reactor status, reviewed pre-employment screening and reviewed the action taken after contact with tuberculosis by staff members. We assessed all 61 staff members, including 44 nurses, 1 physiotherapist, 11 doctors and 5 domestic workers. staff members had had BCG vaccination. Heaf testing revealed 3 Heaf-negative subjects and, of the remainder, 52 had grade 3 or stronger reactions. Only doctors, nurses and domestic workers had had any pre-employment screening. No action was taken by any doctor after their last contact with tuberculosis, whereas nurses and domestic workers had had chest X-rays. This study shows the low importance with which the risk of tuberculosis is perceived, particularly by doctors and demonstrates the need for stricter supervision and improved quality of pre-employment screening.