社交网络上不可避免的背景调查:将求职者的履历和职位联系起来

Tomotaka Okuno, A. Utsumi, Masatsugu Ichino, H. Yoshiura, I. Echizen
{"title":"社交网络上不可避免的背景调查:将求职者的履历和职位联系起来","authors":"Tomotaka Okuno, A. Utsumi, Masatsugu Ichino, H. Yoshiura, I. Echizen","doi":"10.1109/PerComW.2013.6529494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A growing source of concern is that the privacy of individuals can be violated by linking information from multiple sources. For example, the linking of a person's anonymized information with other information about that person can lead to de-anonymization of the person. To investigate the social risks of such linking, we investigated the use of social networks for background checking, which is the process of evaluating the qualifications of job seekers, and evaluated the risk posed by the linking of information the employer already has with information on social networks. After clarifying the risk, we developed a system that links information from different sources: information extracted from a job seeker's résumé and anonymous posts on social networks. The system automatically calculates the similarity between information in the résumé and in the posts, and identifies the job seeker's social network accounts even though the profiles may have been anonymized. As a part of our system, we developed a novel method for quantifying the implications of terms in a résumé by using the posts on social networks. In an evaluation using the résumés of two job seekers and the tweets of 100 users, the system identified the accounts of both job seekers with reasonably good accuracy (true positive rate of 0.941 and true negative rate of 0.999). These findings reveal the real social threat of linking information from different sources. Our research should thus form the basis for further study of the relationship between privacy in social networks and the freedom to express opinions.","PeriodicalId":101502,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ineluctable background checking on social networks: Linking job seeker's résumé and posts\",\"authors\":\"Tomotaka Okuno, A. Utsumi, Masatsugu Ichino, H. Yoshiura, I. Echizen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PerComW.2013.6529494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A growing source of concern is that the privacy of individuals can be violated by linking information from multiple sources. For example, the linking of a person's anonymized information with other information about that person can lead to de-anonymization of the person. To investigate the social risks of such linking, we investigated the use of social networks for background checking, which is the process of evaluating the qualifications of job seekers, and evaluated the risk posed by the linking of information the employer already has with information on social networks. After clarifying the risk, we developed a system that links information from different sources: information extracted from a job seeker's résumé and anonymous posts on social networks. The system automatically calculates the similarity between information in the résumé and in the posts, and identifies the job seeker's social network accounts even though the profiles may have been anonymized. As a part of our system, we developed a novel method for quantifying the implications of terms in a résumé by using the posts on social networks. In an evaluation using the résumés of two job seekers and the tweets of 100 users, the system identified the accounts of both job seekers with reasonably good accuracy (true positive rate of 0.941 and true negative rate of 0.999). These findings reveal the real social threat of linking information from different sources. Our research should thus form the basis for further study of the relationship between privacy in social networks and the freedom to express opinions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PerComW.2013.6529494\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PerComW.2013.6529494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

越来越令人担忧的是,将来自多个来源的信息链接起来可能会侵犯个人隐私。例如,将一个人的匿名信息与有关该人的其他信息链接起来可能导致该人的去匿名化。为了调查这种链接的社会风险,我们调查了使用社交网络进行背景调查的情况,这是评估求职者资格的过程,并评估了雇主已经拥有的信息与社交网络上的信息链接所带来的风险。在明确了风险之后,我们开发了一个系统,将不同来源的信息联系起来:从求职者的履历和社交网络上的匿名帖子中提取的信息。该系统会自动计算简历和职位信息之间的相似度,并识别求职者的社交网络账户,即使这些个人资料可能是匿名的。作为我们系统的一部分,我们开发了一种新的方法,通过使用社交网络上的帖子来量化一份报告中术语的含义。在使用两个求职者的rsamsumsams和100个用户的tweet进行评估时,系统以相当好的准确率识别了两个求职者的账户(真阳性率为0.941,真阴性率为0.999)。这些发现揭示了将不同来源的信息联系起来的真正的社会威胁。因此,我们的研究应该为进一步研究社交网络中的隐私与表达意见自由之间的关系奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ineluctable background checking on social networks: Linking job seeker's résumé and posts
A growing source of concern is that the privacy of individuals can be violated by linking information from multiple sources. For example, the linking of a person's anonymized information with other information about that person can lead to de-anonymization of the person. To investigate the social risks of such linking, we investigated the use of social networks for background checking, which is the process of evaluating the qualifications of job seekers, and evaluated the risk posed by the linking of information the employer already has with information on social networks. After clarifying the risk, we developed a system that links information from different sources: information extracted from a job seeker's résumé and anonymous posts on social networks. The system automatically calculates the similarity between information in the résumé and in the posts, and identifies the job seeker's social network accounts even though the profiles may have been anonymized. As a part of our system, we developed a novel method for quantifying the implications of terms in a résumé by using the posts on social networks. In an evaluation using the résumés of two job seekers and the tweets of 100 users, the system identified the accounts of both job seekers with reasonably good accuracy (true positive rate of 0.941 and true negative rate of 0.999). These findings reveal the real social threat of linking information from different sources. Our research should thus form the basis for further study of the relationship between privacy in social networks and the freedom to express opinions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A reconfigurable distributed CEP middleware for diverse mobility scenarios TinyBox: Social, local, mobile content sharing PIggy-backed key exchange using online services (PIKE) Towards context-aware internet services with unselfish clients Recommendations-based location privacy control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1