[丹麦公共牙科保健中裂隙密封剂的适应症和使用]一个问卷调查。

Tandlaegebladet Pub Date : 1991-11-01
K Ekstrand, L A Nielsen, D Westergaard, M Reinert, A Thylstrup
{"title":"[丹麦公共牙科保健中裂隙密封剂的适应症和使用]一个问卷调查。","authors":"K Ekstrand,&nbsp;L A Nielsen,&nbsp;D Westergaard,&nbsp;M Reinert,&nbsp;A Thylstrup","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the past decade usage of the fissure sealant technique for occlusal caries prevention has been increasingly recommended. This study explores variations in indications and usage of this technique in Denmark. A questionnaire was sent to 205 chief dental officers in the Danish Public Child Dental Health Service (PDHS) covering 90% of Danish children and to municipalities, where dental health to children is provided by private practitioners. More than half of the respondents did not use firmly defined criteria for fissure sealant application. Oral hygiene and previous caries experience were most often stated as indications. Actual usage of the sealant technique differed significantly from the PDHS and private clinics. Thus, 33% of the chief dental officers in the PDHS said that sealants were routinely applied to 8- and 13-year-olds, 43% to 30-80% of the children, and 15% used sealants to less than 10% of 8- and 13-year-olds. In contrast, only 5% of the private clinics reported routinely use of sealing technique, 22% used application to 30-80% of the children, while more than one third of the private practitioners used sealants to less than 10% of the 8- and 13-year-olds. In spite of the significant difference in sealant usage between PDHS and private practitioners, it was not possible to see a corresponding difference neither in caries prevalence nor in occlusal filling incidence. Moreover, analysis of PDHS caries prevalence data revealed that PDHS variations could not be explained by variations of risk in terms of social classes and caries incidence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":76577,"journal":{"name":"Tandlaegebladet","volume":"95 16","pages":"741-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Indications and use of fissure sealants in public dental health care in Denmark. A questionnaire-investigation].\",\"authors\":\"K Ekstrand,&nbsp;L A Nielsen,&nbsp;D Westergaard,&nbsp;M Reinert,&nbsp;A Thylstrup\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During the past decade usage of the fissure sealant technique for occlusal caries prevention has been increasingly recommended. This study explores variations in indications and usage of this technique in Denmark. A questionnaire was sent to 205 chief dental officers in the Danish Public Child Dental Health Service (PDHS) covering 90% of Danish children and to municipalities, where dental health to children is provided by private practitioners. More than half of the respondents did not use firmly defined criteria for fissure sealant application. Oral hygiene and previous caries experience were most often stated as indications. Actual usage of the sealant technique differed significantly from the PDHS and private clinics. Thus, 33% of the chief dental officers in the PDHS said that sealants were routinely applied to 8- and 13-year-olds, 43% to 30-80% of the children, and 15% used sealants to less than 10% of 8- and 13-year-olds. In contrast, only 5% of the private clinics reported routinely use of sealing technique, 22% used application to 30-80% of the children, while more than one third of the private practitioners used sealants to less than 10% of the 8- and 13-year-olds. In spite of the significant difference in sealant usage between PDHS and private practitioners, it was not possible to see a corresponding difference neither in caries prevalence nor in occlusal filling incidence. Moreover, analysis of PDHS caries prevalence data revealed that PDHS variations could not be explained by variations of risk in terms of social classes and caries incidence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tandlaegebladet\",\"volume\":\"95 16\",\"pages\":\"741-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tandlaegebladet\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tandlaegebladet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的十年中,越来越多的人推荐使用牙缝密封技术来预防牙合龋。本研究探讨了该技术在丹麦的适应症和用法的变化。向覆盖90%丹麦儿童的丹麦公共儿童牙科保健服务机构的205名首席牙医和由私人开业医生提供儿童牙科保健服务的市镇发送了一份调查问卷。超过一半的受访者没有使用严格定义的裂缝密封剂应用标准。口腔卫生和既往龋齿经历最常被认为是指征。实际使用的密封胶技术明显不同于公共卫生和私人诊所。因此,33%的PDHS首席牙医表示,8岁和13岁的儿童经常使用密封剂,43%至30-80%的儿童使用密封剂,15%的8岁和13岁儿童使用密封剂的比例不到10%。相比之下,只有5%的私人诊所报告常规使用密封技术,22%对30-80%的儿童使用密封技术,而超过三分之一的私人医生对不到10%的8岁和13岁儿童使用密封胶。尽管PDHS和私人医生在使用密封剂方面存在显著差异,但在龋齿患病率和咬合充填发生率方面都不可能看到相应的差异。此外,对PDHS龋患病率数据的分析表明,PDHS的变化不能用社会阶层和龋发病率方面的风险变化来解释。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Indications and use of fissure sealants in public dental health care in Denmark. A questionnaire-investigation].

During the past decade usage of the fissure sealant technique for occlusal caries prevention has been increasingly recommended. This study explores variations in indications and usage of this technique in Denmark. A questionnaire was sent to 205 chief dental officers in the Danish Public Child Dental Health Service (PDHS) covering 90% of Danish children and to municipalities, where dental health to children is provided by private practitioners. More than half of the respondents did not use firmly defined criteria for fissure sealant application. Oral hygiene and previous caries experience were most often stated as indications. Actual usage of the sealant technique differed significantly from the PDHS and private clinics. Thus, 33% of the chief dental officers in the PDHS said that sealants were routinely applied to 8- and 13-year-olds, 43% to 30-80% of the children, and 15% used sealants to less than 10% of 8- and 13-year-olds. In contrast, only 5% of the private clinics reported routinely use of sealing technique, 22% used application to 30-80% of the children, while more than one third of the private practitioners used sealants to less than 10% of the 8- and 13-year-olds. In spite of the significant difference in sealant usage between PDHS and private practitioners, it was not possible to see a corresponding difference neither in caries prevalence nor in occlusal filling incidence. Moreover, analysis of PDHS caries prevalence data revealed that PDHS variations could not be explained by variations of risk in terms of social classes and caries incidence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Argument about oral mucous membrane epithelium]. [Development of dentistry]. [Dentist and physician integrated training at the Health Sciences Faculty at Copenhagen]. [A comparison of two methods for pre-operative radiographic examination in treatment with oral implants in the anterior mandibular area]. [Single-side fracture of mandibular condyle].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1