条约法的变化、稳定和通过变化实现的稳定:《条约法》再版

Ceren Zeynep Pirim
{"title":"条约法的变化、稳定和通过变化实现的稳定:《条约法》再版","authors":"Ceren Zeynep Pirim","doi":"10.54049/taad.1139345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The principle of pacta sunt servanda, according to which every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed in good faith aims at maintaining stability in international legal order. However, in cases where important change of circumstances occurs with regard to those existing at the time of the conclusion of a treaty, the balance between the parties may be disturbed and the aim and the purpose of the treaty may become meaningless. Therefore, if the principle of pacta sunt servanda is interpreted as containing no exception, States would be reluctant to establish contractual relationships that could not be terminated even in very different conditions and circumstances. This would certainly cause instability in international relations. \nInternational law aims at establishing the balance between stability and change by the principle traditionally referred to as rebus sic stantibus which is based on the idea that treaties cannot be considered as being independent from the conditions that paved the way for their conclusion. According to this principle, in some cases where a fundamental change of circumstances which has occurred with regard to those existing at the time of the conclusion of a treaty, and which was not foreseen by the parties, these latter may terminate the treaty or withdraw from it. \nAlthough being a settled principle of positive international law, the meaning of rebus sic stantibus generates intensive debate among States and national and international judicial instances. Article 62 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the international jurisprudence interpret the principle objectively in light of the “shared expectations” of the parties to international treaties. Whereas States seem to invoke the principle based on their subjective “vital interests”. This article discusses how the principle needs to be interpreted to achieve its aim without being discretionary used by States.","PeriodicalId":106262,"journal":{"name":"Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Change, Stability and Stability by Change in the Law of Treaties: Rebus Sic Stantibus\",\"authors\":\"Ceren Zeynep Pirim\",\"doi\":\"10.54049/taad.1139345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The principle of pacta sunt servanda, according to which every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed in good faith aims at maintaining stability in international legal order. However, in cases where important change of circumstances occurs with regard to those existing at the time of the conclusion of a treaty, the balance between the parties may be disturbed and the aim and the purpose of the treaty may become meaningless. Therefore, if the principle of pacta sunt servanda is interpreted as containing no exception, States would be reluctant to establish contractual relationships that could not be terminated even in very different conditions and circumstances. This would certainly cause instability in international relations. \\nInternational law aims at establishing the balance between stability and change by the principle traditionally referred to as rebus sic stantibus which is based on the idea that treaties cannot be considered as being independent from the conditions that paved the way for their conclusion. According to this principle, in some cases where a fundamental change of circumstances which has occurred with regard to those existing at the time of the conclusion of a treaty, and which was not foreseen by the parties, these latter may terminate the treaty or withdraw from it. \\nAlthough being a settled principle of positive international law, the meaning of rebus sic stantibus generates intensive debate among States and national and international judicial instances. Article 62 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the international jurisprudence interpret the principle objectively in light of the “shared expectations” of the parties to international treaties. Whereas States seem to invoke the principle based on their subjective “vital interests”. This article discusses how the principle needs to be interpreted to achieve its aim without being discretionary used by States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54049/taad.1139345\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54049/taad.1139345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《条约必须遵守》的原则旨在维护国际法律秩序的稳定。根据这一原则,每一项有效的条约都对其缔约国具有约束力,必须真诚地加以履行。但是,在缔结条约时存在的情况发生重大变化的情况下,当事方之间的平衡可能受到干扰,条约的目的和宗旨可能变得毫无意义。因此,如果将契约必须遵守的原则解释为不包含任何例外,各国将不愿意建立即使在非常不同的条件和情况下也不能终止的合同关系。这肯定会造成国际关系的不稳定。国际法的目的是通过传统上被称为恒常不变的原则在稳定与变化之间建立平衡,这一原则所基于的观念是,条约不能被视为独立于为缔结条约铺平道路的条件之外。根据这一原则,在缔结条约时存在的情况发生根本变化,而当事方没有预见到这种变化的某些情况下,后者可以终止条约或退出条约。虽然是实证国际法的一项既定原则,但事实事实的含义在各国之间以及国内和国际司法案件中引起了激烈的辩论。1969年《维也纳条约法公约》第62条和国际法理学根据国际条约缔约国的“共同期望”客观地解释了这一原则。鉴于各国似乎是根据其主观的“重大利益”援引这一原则。本条讨论了如何解释这一原则,以达到其目的,而不被各国任意使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Change, Stability and Stability by Change in the Law of Treaties: Rebus Sic Stantibus
The principle of pacta sunt servanda, according to which every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed in good faith aims at maintaining stability in international legal order. However, in cases where important change of circumstances occurs with regard to those existing at the time of the conclusion of a treaty, the balance between the parties may be disturbed and the aim and the purpose of the treaty may become meaningless. Therefore, if the principle of pacta sunt servanda is interpreted as containing no exception, States would be reluctant to establish contractual relationships that could not be terminated even in very different conditions and circumstances. This would certainly cause instability in international relations. International law aims at establishing the balance between stability and change by the principle traditionally referred to as rebus sic stantibus which is based on the idea that treaties cannot be considered as being independent from the conditions that paved the way for their conclusion. According to this principle, in some cases where a fundamental change of circumstances which has occurred with regard to those existing at the time of the conclusion of a treaty, and which was not foreseen by the parties, these latter may terminate the treaty or withdraw from it. Although being a settled principle of positive international law, the meaning of rebus sic stantibus generates intensive debate among States and national and international judicial instances. Article 62 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the international jurisprudence interpret the principle objectively in light of the “shared expectations” of the parties to international treaties. Whereas States seem to invoke the principle based on their subjective “vital interests”. This article discusses how the principle needs to be interpreted to achieve its aim without being discretionary used by States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Legal Situation of Unaccompanied Minors in Turkish Law The Authority of ICSID Tribunals for Suspension of Turkish Criminal Proceedings CEZAYA DEĞER HAKSIZLIĞIN FORMEL TESPİTİNDE PARÇA HAREKET TEORİSİ (TEIL-/ZWISCHENAKTSTHEORIE) VE HUKUKUMUZ BAKIMINDAN UYGULANABİLİRLİĞİ Evaluation of Provisions of Article 15 of the Cadastre Law Titled Partition and Partial Acaustion within the Framework of the Principle ANAYASA MAHKEMESİNİN TMK m. 187’NİN İPTALİNE İLİŞKİN KARARININ ANALİZİ VE DÜZENLEME ÖNERİSİ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1