{"title":"信息物理系统一致性测试:比较研究","authors":"M. Mohaqeqi, M. Mousavi, Walid Taha","doi":"10.14279/tuj.eceasst.70.982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For systematic and automatic testing of cyber-physical systems, in which a set of test cases is generated based on a formal specification, a number of notions of conformance testing have been proposed. In this paper, we review two existing theories of conformance testing for cyber-physical systems and compare them. We point out their fundamental differences, and prove under which assumptions they","PeriodicalId":115235,"journal":{"name":"Electron. Commun. Eur. Assoc. Softw. Sci. Technol.","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conformance Testing of Cyber-Physical Systems: A Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"M. Mohaqeqi, M. Mousavi, Walid Taha\",\"doi\":\"10.14279/tuj.eceasst.70.982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For systematic and automatic testing of cyber-physical systems, in which a set of test cases is generated based on a formal specification, a number of notions of conformance testing have been proposed. In this paper, we review two existing theories of conformance testing for cyber-physical systems and compare them. We point out their fundamental differences, and prove under which assumptions they\",\"PeriodicalId\":115235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electron. Commun. Eur. Assoc. Softw. Sci. Technol.\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electron. Commun. Eur. Assoc. Softw. Sci. Technol.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14279/tuj.eceasst.70.982\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electron. Commun. Eur. Assoc. Softw. Sci. Technol.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14279/tuj.eceasst.70.982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Conformance Testing of Cyber-Physical Systems: A Comparative Study
For systematic and automatic testing of cyber-physical systems, in which a set of test cases is generated based on a formal specification, a number of notions of conformance testing have been proposed. In this paper, we review two existing theories of conformance testing for cyber-physical systems and compare them. We point out their fundamental differences, and prove under which assumptions they