{"title":"定量脑电图中操作者间的变异。","authors":"M A Hamilton-Bruce, K L Boundy, G H Purdie","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the study was to determine whether quantitative or discriminant analysis of the electroencephalograph (EEG) would vary significantly when the same EEG was analysed by 3 different operators. EEGs on 10 healthy volunteers were recorded on the Cadwell Spectrum AT 386, using the Electrocap (10-20 system). The EEGs were analysed independently, with each operator selecting the first 48 artifact-free epochs. The results were analysed using the non-parametric Friedman two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the discrimination analysis and a one-way ANOVA for the monopolar and bipolar Absolute Power raw measures. Statistical analysis of the discriminant data showed no significant differences between operators, with 7 of 10 studies yielding the same results. The remaining 3 studies were classified either as borderline or normal when analysed by different operators. Although a series of \"t\" tests comparing 2 operators showed most variability occurring in Absolute Power as compared with Relative Power, Power Asymmetry and Coherence, ANOVA of the raw mono- and bipolar Absolute Power measures showed no significant differences between the operators at the P = 0.05 level. Thus the differences between the operators were non-significant when comparing quantitative EEG analyses with respect to both the raw measures and the discriminant analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":75709,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental neurology","volume":"28 ","pages":"219-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interoperator variability in quantitative electroencephalography.\",\"authors\":\"M A Hamilton-Bruce, K L Boundy, G H Purdie\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of the study was to determine whether quantitative or discriminant analysis of the electroencephalograph (EEG) would vary significantly when the same EEG was analysed by 3 different operators. EEGs on 10 healthy volunteers were recorded on the Cadwell Spectrum AT 386, using the Electrocap (10-20 system). The EEGs were analysed independently, with each operator selecting the first 48 artifact-free epochs. The results were analysed using the non-parametric Friedman two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the discrimination analysis and a one-way ANOVA for the monopolar and bipolar Absolute Power raw measures. Statistical analysis of the discriminant data showed no significant differences between operators, with 7 of 10 studies yielding the same results. The remaining 3 studies were classified either as borderline or normal when analysed by different operators. Although a series of \\\"t\\\" tests comparing 2 operators showed most variability occurring in Absolute Power as compared with Relative Power, Power Asymmetry and Coherence, ANOVA of the raw mono- and bipolar Absolute Power measures showed no significant differences between the operators at the P = 0.05 level. Thus the differences between the operators were non-significant when comparing quantitative EEG analyses with respect to both the raw measures and the discriminant analyses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and experimental neurology\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"219-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and experimental neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是确定当3个不同的操作人员对同一脑电图进行分析时,脑电图(EEG)的定量分析或判别分析是否会有显著差异。使用Electrocap(10-20系统)在Cadwell Spectrum AT 386上记录10名健康志愿者的脑电图。独立分析脑电图,每个操作员选择前48个无伪影的时期。结果采用非参数弗里德曼双向方差分析(ANOVA)进行歧视分析,单极和双极绝对功率原始测量采用单向方差分析。对判别数据的统计分析显示,操作人员之间没有显著差异,10项研究中有7项得出相同的结果。其余3项研究经不同操作人员分析后分为边缘或正常。尽管比较两种操作符的一系列“t”检验显示,与相对功率、功率不对称和一致性相比,绝对功率发生了最大的变异,但单极和双极绝对功率的方差分析显示,在P = 0.05水平上,操作符之间没有显著差异。因此,当比较相对于原始测量和判别分析的定量脑电图分析时,操作员之间的差异是不显著的。
Interoperator variability in quantitative electroencephalography.
The purpose of the study was to determine whether quantitative or discriminant analysis of the electroencephalograph (EEG) would vary significantly when the same EEG was analysed by 3 different operators. EEGs on 10 healthy volunteers were recorded on the Cadwell Spectrum AT 386, using the Electrocap (10-20 system). The EEGs were analysed independently, with each operator selecting the first 48 artifact-free epochs. The results were analysed using the non-parametric Friedman two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the discrimination analysis and a one-way ANOVA for the monopolar and bipolar Absolute Power raw measures. Statistical analysis of the discriminant data showed no significant differences between operators, with 7 of 10 studies yielding the same results. The remaining 3 studies were classified either as borderline or normal when analysed by different operators. Although a series of "t" tests comparing 2 operators showed most variability occurring in Absolute Power as compared with Relative Power, Power Asymmetry and Coherence, ANOVA of the raw mono- and bipolar Absolute Power measures showed no significant differences between the operators at the P = 0.05 level. Thus the differences between the operators were non-significant when comparing quantitative EEG analyses with respect to both the raw measures and the discriminant analyses.