简化和展示区块链风险的复杂性:约翰霍普金斯区块链风险图介绍

Jiarui Chen, Qi Tong, H. Verma, Avinash Sharma, A. Dahbura, J. Liew
{"title":"简化和展示区块链风险的复杂性:约翰霍普金斯区块链风险图介绍","authors":"Jiarui Chen, Qi Tong, H. Verma, Avinash Sharma, A. Dahbura, J. Liew","doi":"10.3905/jfds.2022.1.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blockchains have ushered in the next stage in the evolution of the Internet, transitioning us from Web 2.0 to 3.0. However, given the complex nature of this innovative technology and the inability to clearly measure and properly communicate the risks in blockchains, arguably this murkiness has hampered the development, growth, proper regulation, and, ultimately, the true societal beneficial contributions of blockchains. In an attempt to clear the confusion, the authors propose the Johns Hopkins Blockchain Risk Map. The authors present their risk map prototype, their current multidimensional exhibit of risks across the various stakeholders, and their current modest progress with some data on their current risk measures. The authors are attempting to create a safe space whereby blockchain risks are defined, displayed, debated, researched, fine-tuned, standardized, and freely shared. The authors believe that such a platform would be an ideal mechanism for education, networking, and collaboration for the next generation, specifically those who are underrepresented in the current blockchain development community. By increasing the transparency and debating risk issues in a safe academic environment, the authors hope that this risk map will help move blockchain adoption forward and spur more entrepreneurial activity across this industry. In this article, the authors lay down their initial thoughts and current progress and challenges. Although this article is in no way exhaustive, the authors provide several categorizations of blockchain risks: operational, decentralization, security, social sentiment, investment, and systemic, to name a few.","PeriodicalId":199045,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Financial Data Science","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Complexity of Blockchain Risks Simplified and Displayed: Introduction of the Johns Hopkins Blockchain Risk Map\",\"authors\":\"Jiarui Chen, Qi Tong, H. Verma, Avinash Sharma, A. Dahbura, J. Liew\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jfds.2022.1.117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Blockchains have ushered in the next stage in the evolution of the Internet, transitioning us from Web 2.0 to 3.0. However, given the complex nature of this innovative technology and the inability to clearly measure and properly communicate the risks in blockchains, arguably this murkiness has hampered the development, growth, proper regulation, and, ultimately, the true societal beneficial contributions of blockchains. In an attempt to clear the confusion, the authors propose the Johns Hopkins Blockchain Risk Map. The authors present their risk map prototype, their current multidimensional exhibit of risks across the various stakeholders, and their current modest progress with some data on their current risk measures. The authors are attempting to create a safe space whereby blockchain risks are defined, displayed, debated, researched, fine-tuned, standardized, and freely shared. The authors believe that such a platform would be an ideal mechanism for education, networking, and collaboration for the next generation, specifically those who are underrepresented in the current blockchain development community. By increasing the transparency and debating risk issues in a safe academic environment, the authors hope that this risk map will help move blockchain adoption forward and spur more entrepreneurial activity across this industry. In this article, the authors lay down their initial thoughts and current progress and challenges. Although this article is in no way exhaustive, the authors provide several categorizations of blockchain risks: operational, decentralization, security, social sentiment, investment, and systemic, to name a few.\",\"PeriodicalId\":199045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Financial Data Science\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Financial Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jfds.2022.1.117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Financial Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jfds.2022.1.117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

区块链引领了互联网发展的下一个阶段,将我们从Web 2.0过渡到3.0。然而,鉴于这种创新技术的复杂性,以及无法清楚地衡量和适当地传达区块链中的风险,可以说,这种模糊性阻碍了区块链的发展、增长、适当的监管,并最终阻碍了区块链真正的社会有益贡献。为了消除这种困惑,作者提出了约翰霍普金斯区块链风险图。作者展示了他们的风险图原型,他们当前跨各种利益相关者的多维风险展示,以及他们当前的适度进展,以及他们当前风险度量的一些数据。作者试图创造一个安全的空间,在这个空间里,区块链风险被定义、展示、辩论、研究、微调、标准化和自由共享。作者认为,这样一个平台将是下一代教育、网络和协作的理想机制,特别是那些在当前区块链开发社区中代表性不足的人。通过在安全的学术环境中提高透明度和讨论风险问题,作者希望这张风险图将有助于推动区块链的采用,并在整个行业中激发更多的创业活动。在这篇文章中,作者阐述了他们最初的想法和目前的进展和挑战。虽然这篇文章并不详尽,但作者提供了区块链风险的几种分类:操作,去中心化,安全,社会情绪,投资和系统,仅举几例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Complexity of Blockchain Risks Simplified and Displayed: Introduction of the Johns Hopkins Blockchain Risk Map
Blockchains have ushered in the next stage in the evolution of the Internet, transitioning us from Web 2.0 to 3.0. However, given the complex nature of this innovative technology and the inability to clearly measure and properly communicate the risks in blockchains, arguably this murkiness has hampered the development, growth, proper regulation, and, ultimately, the true societal beneficial contributions of blockchains. In an attempt to clear the confusion, the authors propose the Johns Hopkins Blockchain Risk Map. The authors present their risk map prototype, their current multidimensional exhibit of risks across the various stakeholders, and their current modest progress with some data on their current risk measures. The authors are attempting to create a safe space whereby blockchain risks are defined, displayed, debated, researched, fine-tuned, standardized, and freely shared. The authors believe that such a platform would be an ideal mechanism for education, networking, and collaboration for the next generation, specifically those who are underrepresented in the current blockchain development community. By increasing the transparency and debating risk issues in a safe academic environment, the authors hope that this risk map will help move blockchain adoption forward and spur more entrepreneurial activity across this industry. In this article, the authors lay down their initial thoughts and current progress and challenges. Although this article is in no way exhaustive, the authors provide several categorizations of blockchain risks: operational, decentralization, security, social sentiment, investment, and systemic, to name a few.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Managing Editor’s Letter Explainable Machine Learning Models of Consumer Credit Risk Predicting Returns with Machine Learning across Horizons, Firm Size, and Time Deep Calibration with Artificial Neural Network: A Performance Comparison on Option-Pricing Models RIFT: Pretraining and Applications for Representations of Interrelated Financial Time Series
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1