可持续发展目标报告:企业可持续发展领导者分析

Idoya Ferrero-Ferrero, M. Muñoz-Torres, J. Rivera-Lirio, Elena Escrig-Olmedo, M. A. Fernández-Izquierdo
{"title":"可持续发展目标报告:企业可持续发展领导者分析","authors":"Idoya Ferrero-Ferrero, M. Muñoz-Torres, J. Rivera-Lirio, Elena Escrig-Olmedo, M. A. Fernández-Izquierdo","doi":"10.1108/mip-07-2022-0332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to empirically analyze a sound commitment and a consistent integration of sustainable development goals (SDGs) in the corporate reporting and management systems of companies that have a leading position in sustainability.Design/methodology/approachThe study applies a content analysis procedure based on a proposed analytical framework to codify the commitment and the SDG integration. In order to analyze the consistency of the integration, this study has provided a “SDG integration” score based on fuzzy inference systems methods. The companies in the sample have been identified as benchmarks in terms of sustainability in a specific region of Spain.FindingsThe findings show a lack of formality regarding the SDG commitment at the highest decision-making level and a low level of SDG integration in the reporting and management systems. These results are mainly explained because the most companies do not prioritize according to the materiality analysis and those SDGs more reported have not been deployed along targets and KPIs in a consistent way.Research limitations/implicationsThe results provide practical implications that help to overcome the limitations in terms of comparison and consistency of the SDGs-reported information. It also illustrates how the leading sustainable companies are doing the SDG reporting and suggests which elements could be improved to promote a consistent integration of the SDGs in the management systems.Originality/valueThis study provides new work lines in the promotion of an effective SDG-business reporting based on a robust management structure that allows an alignment among the SDG-business decisions based on a normative, strategic and operational approach.","PeriodicalId":402197,"journal":{"name":"Marketing Intelligence & Planning","volume":"45 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SDG reporting: an analysis of corporate sustainability leaders\",\"authors\":\"Idoya Ferrero-Ferrero, M. Muñoz-Torres, J. Rivera-Lirio, Elena Escrig-Olmedo, M. A. Fernández-Izquierdo\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/mip-07-2022-0332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis study aims to empirically analyze a sound commitment and a consistent integration of sustainable development goals (SDGs) in the corporate reporting and management systems of companies that have a leading position in sustainability.Design/methodology/approachThe study applies a content analysis procedure based on a proposed analytical framework to codify the commitment and the SDG integration. In order to analyze the consistency of the integration, this study has provided a “SDG integration” score based on fuzzy inference systems methods. The companies in the sample have been identified as benchmarks in terms of sustainability in a specific region of Spain.FindingsThe findings show a lack of formality regarding the SDG commitment at the highest decision-making level and a low level of SDG integration in the reporting and management systems. These results are mainly explained because the most companies do not prioritize according to the materiality analysis and those SDGs more reported have not been deployed along targets and KPIs in a consistent way.Research limitations/implicationsThe results provide practical implications that help to overcome the limitations in terms of comparison and consistency of the SDGs-reported information. It also illustrates how the leading sustainable companies are doing the SDG reporting and suggests which elements could be improved to promote a consistent integration of the SDGs in the management systems.Originality/valueThis study provides new work lines in the promotion of an effective SDG-business reporting based on a robust management structure that allows an alignment among the SDG-business decisions based on a normative, strategic and operational approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marketing Intelligence & Planning\",\"volume\":\"45 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marketing Intelligence & Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-07-2022-0332\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marketing Intelligence & Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-07-2022-0332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究旨在实证分析在可持续发展方面处于领先地位的公司在公司报告和管理体系中对可持续发展目标(sdg)的良好承诺和一致整合。设计/方法/方法该研究采用基于拟议分析框架的内容分析程序,以编纂承诺和可持续发展目标的整合。为了分析整合的一致性,本研究提供了一个基于模糊推理系统方法的“可持续发展目标整合”评分。样本中的公司已被确定为西班牙特定地区可持续性方面的基准。调查结果表明,在最高决策层面,可持续发展目标承诺缺乏正式形式,可持续发展目标在报告和管理系统中的整合程度较低。这些结果的主要解释是因为大多数公司没有根据重要性分析来确定优先级,而且更多报告的可持续发展目标没有以一致的方式与目标和kpi一起部署。研究局限性/意义研究结果提供了实际意义,有助于克服可持续发展目标报告信息的比较和一致性方面的局限性。它还说明了领先的可持续发展公司是如何做可持续发展目标报告的,并建议哪些要素可以改进,以促进可持续发展目标在管理系统中的一致整合。独创性/价值本研究提供了新的工作路线,以促进有效的可持续发展目标业务报告,该报告基于稳健的管理结构,允许基于规范、战略和操作方法的可持续发展目标业务决策之间的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SDG reporting: an analysis of corporate sustainability leaders
PurposeThis study aims to empirically analyze a sound commitment and a consistent integration of sustainable development goals (SDGs) in the corporate reporting and management systems of companies that have a leading position in sustainability.Design/methodology/approachThe study applies a content analysis procedure based on a proposed analytical framework to codify the commitment and the SDG integration. In order to analyze the consistency of the integration, this study has provided a “SDG integration” score based on fuzzy inference systems methods. The companies in the sample have been identified as benchmarks in terms of sustainability in a specific region of Spain.FindingsThe findings show a lack of formality regarding the SDG commitment at the highest decision-making level and a low level of SDG integration in the reporting and management systems. These results are mainly explained because the most companies do not prioritize according to the materiality analysis and those SDGs more reported have not been deployed along targets and KPIs in a consistent way.Research limitations/implicationsThe results provide practical implications that help to overcome the limitations in terms of comparison and consistency of the SDGs-reported information. It also illustrates how the leading sustainable companies are doing the SDG reporting and suggests which elements could be improved to promote a consistent integration of the SDGs in the management systems.Originality/valueThis study provides new work lines in the promotion of an effective SDG-business reporting based on a robust management structure that allows an alignment among the SDG-business decisions based on a normative, strategic and operational approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social media communication, consumer attitude and purchase intention in lifestyle category products: a PLS-SEM modeling Social media communication, consumer attitude and purchase intention in lifestyle category products: a PLS-SEM modeling Brand equity and financial performance: an institutional view Unveiling promotion-induced variety-seeking: the roles of various types of promotional rewards and shopping motivations Logistics service failures and recovery strategies: is the response time or the discount amount more important?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1