可持续设计的代表性框架

R. Grover, S. Emmitt, A. Copping
{"title":"可持续设计的代表性框架","authors":"R. Grover, S. Emmitt, A. Copping","doi":"10.2495/ARC180061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainable design is a widely accepted concept, but there is no general consensus on its realisation, as evidenced by the range of strategies in the built environment that fall under the umbrella of “green” design. These vary from technological innovation to empowering social action; which often represents competing world-views, that are often seemingly contradictory or incompatible. Therefore, design for sustainability requires the designer to advocate an ethical or moral stance; and to decide on where to assign value. Despite this, there is no coherent framework which structures the complexity of this field. In this paper, existing models of sustainable development and design are analysed and a new framework that classifies alternative approaches is proposed. The framework presents conflicting paradigms on a continuum, which provides structure to the discourse on sustainable design, allowing building designers to map their own strategic approaches, recognise inconsistencies and reveal potential future directions. Rather than suggesting that sustainability has a single definable outcome; the framework provides a means to contextualise different, yet equally valid, design scenarios.","PeriodicalId":431486,"journal":{"name":"Eco-Architecture VII: Harmonisation between Architecture and Nature","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A REPRESENTATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE DESIGN\",\"authors\":\"R. Grover, S. Emmitt, A. Copping\",\"doi\":\"10.2495/ARC180061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sustainable design is a widely accepted concept, but there is no general consensus on its realisation, as evidenced by the range of strategies in the built environment that fall under the umbrella of “green” design. These vary from technological innovation to empowering social action; which often represents competing world-views, that are often seemingly contradictory or incompatible. Therefore, design for sustainability requires the designer to advocate an ethical or moral stance; and to decide on where to assign value. Despite this, there is no coherent framework which structures the complexity of this field. In this paper, existing models of sustainable development and design are analysed and a new framework that classifies alternative approaches is proposed. The framework presents conflicting paradigms on a continuum, which provides structure to the discourse on sustainable design, allowing building designers to map their own strategic approaches, recognise inconsistencies and reveal potential future directions. Rather than suggesting that sustainability has a single definable outcome; the framework provides a means to contextualise different, yet equally valid, design scenarios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eco-Architecture VII: Harmonisation between Architecture and Nature\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eco-Architecture VII: Harmonisation between Architecture and Nature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2495/ARC180061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eco-Architecture VII: Harmonisation between Architecture and Nature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/ARC180061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可持续设计是一个被广泛接受的概念,但它的实现并没有普遍的共识,正如建筑环境中属于“绿色”设计的一系列策略所证明的那样。这些措施从技术创新到赋予社会行动权力不等;它通常代表着相互竞争的世界观,通常看起来是矛盾的或不相容的。因此,可持续设计要求设计师倡导伦理或道德立场;并决定在哪里赋值。尽管如此,没有一个连贯的框架来构建这个领域的复杂性。本文对现有的可持续发展和设计模型进行了分析,并提出了一个新的框架,对可选方法进行分类。该框架在一个连续体上呈现了相互冲突的范式,为可持续设计的论述提供了结构,允许建筑设计师绘制自己的战略方法,识别不一致性并揭示潜在的未来方向。而不是暗示可持续发展有一个单一的可定义的结果;该框架提供了一种将不同但同样有效的设计场景置于环境中的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A REPRESENTATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE DESIGN
Sustainable design is a widely accepted concept, but there is no general consensus on its realisation, as evidenced by the range of strategies in the built environment that fall under the umbrella of “green” design. These vary from technological innovation to empowering social action; which often represents competing world-views, that are often seemingly contradictory or incompatible. Therefore, design for sustainability requires the designer to advocate an ethical or moral stance; and to decide on where to assign value. Despite this, there is no coherent framework which structures the complexity of this field. In this paper, existing models of sustainable development and design are analysed and a new framework that classifies alternative approaches is proposed. The framework presents conflicting paradigms on a continuum, which provides structure to the discourse on sustainable design, allowing building designers to map their own strategic approaches, recognise inconsistencies and reveal potential future directions. Rather than suggesting that sustainability has a single definable outcome; the framework provides a means to contextualise different, yet equally valid, design scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
USERS’ PERCEPTION AND EVALUATION OF CAMPUS ECO-OPEN SPACES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF LAGOS, AKOKA CAMPUS, NIGERIA RETHINKING THE BUILDING ENVELOPE: BUILDING INTEGRATED ENERGY POSITIVE SOLUTIONS CIRCULAR CITY: A METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH FOR SUSTAINABLE DISTRICTS AND COMMUNITIES INNOVATIVE CIRCULAR SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES FOR NEW BUILDINGS AND REFURBISHMENTS A SHAPE GRAMMAR APPROACH TO CLIMATICALLY ADAPTABLE FAÇADE SYSTEMS WITH REAL TIME PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1