医学图像分割方法的性能评价

M. Khare, R. Srivastava, A. Khare
{"title":"医学图像分割方法的性能评价","authors":"M. Khare, R. Srivastava, A. Khare","doi":"10.1145/2007052.2007062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the performance evaluation of different segmentation algorithms for medical images. Accuracy and clarity are very important issues for medical imaging and same in the case with segmentation. In this paper, we have proposed a level set method without reinitialization with some specific shapes for segmentation and compared our proposed approach for segmentation with three other approaches where the first approach is based on region splitting based region growing category, second is based on region merging based region growing category and third is based on level set. This comparison is based on six different performance parameters namely Mean Square Error (MSE), Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Maximum Difference (MD), Normalized Cross Correlation (NCC), Normalized Absolute Error (NAE) and Structural Content (SC). We have compared the proposed approach with three above mentioned approaches for several images, out of which results for four images are provided in this paper, and we find that the approach is better than the other one.","PeriodicalId":348804,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Advances in Computing and Artificial Intelligence","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation on segmentation methods for medical images\",\"authors\":\"M. Khare, R. Srivastava, A. Khare\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2007052.2007062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the performance evaluation of different segmentation algorithms for medical images. Accuracy and clarity are very important issues for medical imaging and same in the case with segmentation. In this paper, we have proposed a level set method without reinitialization with some specific shapes for segmentation and compared our proposed approach for segmentation with three other approaches where the first approach is based on region splitting based region growing category, second is based on region merging based region growing category and third is based on level set. This comparison is based on six different performance parameters namely Mean Square Error (MSE), Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Maximum Difference (MD), Normalized Cross Correlation (NCC), Normalized Absolute Error (NAE) and Structural Content (SC). We have compared the proposed approach with three above mentioned approaches for several images, out of which results for four images are provided in this paper, and we find that the approach is better than the other one.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Advances in Computing and Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Advances in Computing and Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2007052.2007062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Advances in Computing and Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2007052.2007062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文对医学图像的分割算法进行了性能评价。准确性和清晰度是医学成像中非常重要的问题,分割也是如此。在本文中,我们提出了一种不需要重新初始化的具有特定形状的水平集分割方法,并将我们提出的分割方法与其他三种方法进行了比较,第一种方法是基于区域分割的区域增长类别,第二种是基于区域合并的区域增长类别,第三种是基于水平集的分割方法。这种比较基于六个不同的性能参数,即均方误差(MSE)、峰值信噪比(PSNR)、最大差(MD)、归一化相互关系(NCC)、归一化绝对误差(NAE)和结构含量(SC)。我们对多幅图像与上述三种方法进行了比较,本文给出了其中四幅图像的结果,我们发现该方法优于另一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance evaluation on segmentation methods for medical images
This paper presents the performance evaluation of different segmentation algorithms for medical images. Accuracy and clarity are very important issues for medical imaging and same in the case with segmentation. In this paper, we have proposed a level set method without reinitialization with some specific shapes for segmentation and compared our proposed approach for segmentation with three other approaches where the first approach is based on region splitting based region growing category, second is based on region merging based region growing category and third is based on level set. This comparison is based on six different performance parameters namely Mean Square Error (MSE), Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Maximum Difference (MD), Normalized Cross Correlation (NCC), Normalized Absolute Error (NAE) and Structural Content (SC). We have compared the proposed approach with three above mentioned approaches for several images, out of which results for four images are provided in this paper, and we find that the approach is better than the other one.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Secured routing over MANET with power management A comparative study of UML tools Automated taxi/cab system using A* algorithm Ontology based semantic similarly ranking of documents Security policy implementation using connection and event log to achieve network access control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1