初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗院前时间:改进的新前沿

J. Kiberd, G. Kephart, I. Bata, A. Quraishi
{"title":"初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗院前时间:改进的新前沿","authors":"J. Kiberd, G. Kephart, I. Bata, A. Quraishi","doi":"10.15273/dmj.vol46no2.10142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) remains the treatment of choice for patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). With STEMI, total ischemic time is an important predictor of myocardial injury and other short and long-term adverse events including mortality. Several studies have examined ‘Door to Balloon’ times, but few studies have examined pre-hospital and in hospital component times as individual pieces that make up total ischemic time. Methods: Total ischemic and component times for patients who received PPCI from 2012- 2015 in the Queen Elizabeth-II Halifax Infirmary were described. Median total ischemic times and component times were calculated and compared. Regression modeling was performed to identify which component times and component variables explained the most variation in total ischemic times. Results: 551 patients who had successful PPCI and complete component times were identified. Most were male (76%) with a median age of 59.2 years (IQR: 52.7-68.0 years). The longest component time was ‘Symptom Onset to First Medical Contact’ (Median: 61 min, IQR: 32-138 min). ‘Symptom Onset to First Medical Contact’ was found to account for most of the variation seen in total ischemic time (R2= 61%). Conclusions: We determined that most time in the component of receiving PPCI lies in the pre-hospital setting and that component variables including EHS use and pre-activation of the cardiac catheter lab reduce total ischemic time. More research needs to be devoted to reducing patient delay, as there appears to be little room for improvement in hospital component times.","PeriodicalId":293977,"journal":{"name":"Dalhousie Medical Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prehospital times in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: The new frontier for improvement\",\"authors\":\"J. Kiberd, G. Kephart, I. Bata, A. Quraishi\",\"doi\":\"10.15273/dmj.vol46no2.10142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) remains the treatment of choice for patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). With STEMI, total ischemic time is an important predictor of myocardial injury and other short and long-term adverse events including mortality. Several studies have examined ‘Door to Balloon’ times, but few studies have examined pre-hospital and in hospital component times as individual pieces that make up total ischemic time. Methods: Total ischemic and component times for patients who received PPCI from 2012- 2015 in the Queen Elizabeth-II Halifax Infirmary were described. Median total ischemic times and component times were calculated and compared. Regression modeling was performed to identify which component times and component variables explained the most variation in total ischemic times. Results: 551 patients who had successful PPCI and complete component times were identified. Most were male (76%) with a median age of 59.2 years (IQR: 52.7-68.0 years). The longest component time was ‘Symptom Onset to First Medical Contact’ (Median: 61 min, IQR: 32-138 min). ‘Symptom Onset to First Medical Contact’ was found to account for most of the variation seen in total ischemic time (R2= 61%). Conclusions: We determined that most time in the component of receiving PPCI lies in the pre-hospital setting and that component variables including EHS use and pre-activation of the cardiac catheter lab reduce total ischemic time. More research needs to be devoted to reducing patient delay, as there appears to be little room for improvement in hospital component times.\",\"PeriodicalId\":293977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dalhousie Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dalhousie Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15273/dmj.vol46no2.10142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dalhousie Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15273/dmj.vol46no2.10142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)仍然是st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的首选治疗方法。对于STEMI,总缺血时间是心肌损伤和其他短期和长期不良事件(包括死亡率)的重要预测指标。有几项研究考察了“从门到气球”的时间,但很少有研究将院前和住院时间作为构成总缺血时间的单个部分进行考察。方法:对2012- 2015年在哈利法克斯女王伊丽莎白二世医院接受PPCI的患者的总缺血时间和组成时间进行描述。计算和比较中位总缺血时间和局部缺血时间。进行回归建模以确定哪些成分时间和成分变量解释了总缺血时间的最大变化。结果:551例患者PPCI手术成功,组件时间完整。多数为男性(76%),中位年龄59.2岁(IQR: 52.7-68.0岁)。最长组成时间为“症状出现至首次医疗接触”(中位数:61分钟,IQR: 32-138分钟)。发现“首次医疗接触时出现的症状”解释了总缺血时间的大部分变化(R2= 61%)。结论:我们确定接受PPCI的大部分时间是在院前设置,并且包括EHS使用和心导管实验室预激活在内的组件变量减少了总缺血时间。需要进行更多的研究以减少患者的延误,因为在医院组成时间方面似乎没有什么改进的余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prehospital times in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: The new frontier for improvement
Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) remains the treatment of choice for patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). With STEMI, total ischemic time is an important predictor of myocardial injury and other short and long-term adverse events including mortality. Several studies have examined ‘Door to Balloon’ times, but few studies have examined pre-hospital and in hospital component times as individual pieces that make up total ischemic time. Methods: Total ischemic and component times for patients who received PPCI from 2012- 2015 in the Queen Elizabeth-II Halifax Infirmary were described. Median total ischemic times and component times were calculated and compared. Regression modeling was performed to identify which component times and component variables explained the most variation in total ischemic times. Results: 551 patients who had successful PPCI and complete component times were identified. Most were male (76%) with a median age of 59.2 years (IQR: 52.7-68.0 years). The longest component time was ‘Symptom Onset to First Medical Contact’ (Median: 61 min, IQR: 32-138 min). ‘Symptom Onset to First Medical Contact’ was found to account for most of the variation seen in total ischemic time (R2= 61%). Conclusions: We determined that most time in the component of receiving PPCI lies in the pre-hospital setting and that component variables including EHS use and pre-activation of the cardiac catheter lab reduce total ischemic time. More research needs to be devoted to reducing patient delay, as there appears to be little room for improvement in hospital component times.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hackathons within medical education: Promoting cutting-edge innovation in surgery The association between gestational age at delivery and neonatal abstinence syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis Two for the price of one: The benefits of job sharing to increase women representation in surgical specialties Cutting edge hackathon competition winners strive to better support more surgeons with primary childcare responsibilities A discussion of contemporary platforms for women in surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1