Magnus Find, Alexander Golovnev, E. Hirsch, A. Kulikov
{"title":"显式函数电路复杂度的一个优于3n的下界","authors":"Magnus Find, Alexander Golovnev, E. Hirsch, A. Kulikov","doi":"10.1109/FOCS.2016.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider Boolean circuits over the full binary basis. We prove a (3+1/86)n-o(n) lower bound on the size of such a circuit for an explicitly defined predicate, namely an affine disperser for sublinear dimension. This improves the 3n-o(n) bound of Norbert Blum (1984).The proof is based on the gate elimination technique extended with the following three ideas. We generalize the computational model by allowing circuits to contain cycles, this in turn allows us to perform affine substitutions. We use a carefully chosen circuit complexity measure to track the progress of the gate elimination process. Finally, we use quadratic substitutions that may be viewed as delayed affine substitutions.","PeriodicalId":414001,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Better-Than-3n Lower Bound for the Circuit Complexity of an Explicit Function\",\"authors\":\"Magnus Find, Alexander Golovnev, E. Hirsch, A. Kulikov\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FOCS.2016.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider Boolean circuits over the full binary basis. We prove a (3+1/86)n-o(n) lower bound on the size of such a circuit for an explicitly defined predicate, namely an affine disperser for sublinear dimension. This improves the 3n-o(n) bound of Norbert Blum (1984).The proof is based on the gate elimination technique extended with the following three ideas. We generalize the computational model by allowing circuits to contain cycles, this in turn allows us to perform affine substitutions. We use a carefully chosen circuit complexity measure to track the progress of the gate elimination process. Finally, we use quadratic substitutions that may be viewed as delayed affine substitutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"44\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS.2016.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS.2016.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Better-Than-3n Lower Bound for the Circuit Complexity of an Explicit Function
We consider Boolean circuits over the full binary basis. We prove a (3+1/86)n-o(n) lower bound on the size of such a circuit for an explicitly defined predicate, namely an affine disperser for sublinear dimension. This improves the 3n-o(n) bound of Norbert Blum (1984).The proof is based on the gate elimination technique extended with the following three ideas. We generalize the computational model by allowing circuits to contain cycles, this in turn allows us to perform affine substitutions. We use a carefully chosen circuit complexity measure to track the progress of the gate elimination process. Finally, we use quadratic substitutions that may be viewed as delayed affine substitutions.