中学科学课堂中促进科学模式社会建构的教师脚手架分析

Hayoung Do, Jeongwoo Park, Junehee Yoo
{"title":"中学科学课堂中促进科学模式社会建构的教师脚手架分析","authors":"Hayoung Do, Jeongwoo Park, Junehee Yoo","doi":"10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.4.0643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to figure out the characteristics of teacher’s scaffolding that can promote the social construction of scientific models by analyzing a teacher’s scaffolding that actually promoted the social construction in a real classroom context, so that we can better understand the teacher’s scaffolding. For this study, a total of 32 middle school students and their science teacher in Seoul were observed and videotaped. The level of social construction were categorized in four stages. We divided the teacher’s scaffolding by whether the level of social construction has changed or not, and analyzed teacher’s scaffolding in each group. Teacher’s scaffolding were categorized based on its object, purpose and means. The object were categorized into two types; small-group and individual. The purpose were categorized into two types; process-help and product-help. The means were coded into Diagnostic strategies(Reading, Listening, Questioning), Checking diagnosis and Intervention strategy(Instruct, Explain, Hint, Confirm). The result show that teacher’s scaffolding is helpful in the social construction of scientific models when it supports small-groups more than individuals, and process-help more than product-help. It also shows that in diagnostic strategies, questioning and listening are effective. Finally, using checking diagnosis promoted interactions among students and a ‘confirm’ intervention strategy should be avoided because it has no positive effect on changes in the level of social construction. This study provides the features of the teacher’s scaffolding that promotes social construction of scientific models in middle school classes.","PeriodicalId":107400,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Analysis of Teacher’s Scaffolding for Promoting Social Construction of Scientific Models in Middle School Science Classes\",\"authors\":\"Hayoung Do, Jeongwoo Park, Junehee Yoo\",\"doi\":\"10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.4.0643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to figure out the characteristics of teacher’s scaffolding that can promote the social construction of scientific models by analyzing a teacher’s scaffolding that actually promoted the social construction in a real classroom context, so that we can better understand the teacher’s scaffolding. For this study, a total of 32 middle school students and their science teacher in Seoul were observed and videotaped. The level of social construction were categorized in four stages. We divided the teacher’s scaffolding by whether the level of social construction has changed or not, and analyzed teacher’s scaffolding in each group. Teacher’s scaffolding were categorized based on its object, purpose and means. The object were categorized into two types; small-group and individual. The purpose were categorized into two types; process-help and product-help. The means were coded into Diagnostic strategies(Reading, Listening, Questioning), Checking diagnosis and Intervention strategy(Instruct, Explain, Hint, Confirm). The result show that teacher’s scaffolding is helpful in the social construction of scientific models when it supports small-groups more than individuals, and process-help more than product-help. It also shows that in diagnostic strategies, questioning and listening are effective. Finally, using checking diagnosis promoted interactions among students and a ‘confirm’ intervention strategy should be avoided because it has no positive effect on changes in the level of social construction. This study provides the features of the teacher’s scaffolding that promotes social construction of scientific models in middle school classes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.4.0643\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.4.0643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是通过分析一个教师在真实课堂情境中实际促进社会建构的脚手架,找出促进科学模型社会建构的教师脚手架的特征,从而更好地理解教师的脚手架。在这项研究中,共有32名中学生和他们的科学老师在首尔被观察和录像。社会建构水平可分为四个阶段。我们将教师的脚手架按照社会建构水平是否发生变化进行划分,并对每一组教师的脚手架进行分析。根据教师搭建的对象、目的和手段对教师搭建进行了分类。对象被分为两类;小团体和个人。目的分为两类;流程帮助和产品帮助。方法分为诊断策略(读、听、问)、检查诊断和干预策略(指导、解释、提示、确认)。结果表明,教师脚手架在科学模型的社会建构中,对小团体的支持大于对个人的支持,对过程帮助大于对产品帮助。研究还表明,在诊断策略中,提问和倾听是有效的。最后,使用检查诊断促进了学生之间的互动,应避免使用“确认”干预策略,因为它对社会建构水平的变化没有积极作用。本研究提供了促进中学课堂科学模型社会建构的教师脚手架的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Analysis of Teacher’s Scaffolding for Promoting Social Construction of Scientific Models in Middle School Science Classes
The purpose of this study is to figure out the characteristics of teacher’s scaffolding that can promote the social construction of scientific models by analyzing a teacher’s scaffolding that actually promoted the social construction in a real classroom context, so that we can better understand the teacher’s scaffolding. For this study, a total of 32 middle school students and their science teacher in Seoul were observed and videotaped. The level of social construction were categorized in four stages. We divided the teacher’s scaffolding by whether the level of social construction has changed or not, and analyzed teacher’s scaffolding in each group. Teacher’s scaffolding were categorized based on its object, purpose and means. The object were categorized into two types; small-group and individual. The purpose were categorized into two types; process-help and product-help. The means were coded into Diagnostic strategies(Reading, Listening, Questioning), Checking diagnosis and Intervention strategy(Instruct, Explain, Hint, Confirm). The result show that teacher’s scaffolding is helpful in the social construction of scientific models when it supports small-groups more than individuals, and process-help more than product-help. It also shows that in diagnostic strategies, questioning and listening are effective. Finally, using checking diagnosis promoted interactions among students and a ‘confirm’ intervention strategy should be avoided because it has no positive effect on changes in the level of social construction. This study provides the features of the teacher’s scaffolding that promotes social construction of scientific models in middle school classes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
2015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 적용에 대한 초·중학교 교사의 인식과 요구 STEAM 기반 학생 연구 활동 분석을 통한 과학 교육에 대한 시사점 고찰 한국, 미국, 영국, 싱가포르의 과학 교육과정 비교 - 에너지 개념을 중심으로 - A Case Study on Application of the NABI Program to Realize the 'Practice Centered Mechanism of Manifesting Character' Item Response Analysis of Energy as a Cross-Cutting Concept for Grades 3 to 9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1