就公开银行业检讨最后报告向库务署提交的联合意见书

Katharine Kemp, D. Vaile
{"title":"就公开银行业检讨最后报告向库务署提交的联合意见书","authors":"Katharine Kemp, D. Vaile","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3150138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This submission responds to the Final Report of the Review into Open Banking in Australia released by Treasury on 9 February 2018. The proposed ‘Open Banking’ regime, if implemented, will be the first incarnation of the broader ‘Open Data’ regime proposed for Australia. The Productivity Commission recommended the enactment of a ‘Consumer Data Right’ to secure the necessary ‘social licence’ for the greatly increasing collection and disclosure of personal information contemplated as part of the proposed ‘Open Data’ regime. The stated goal of the Consumer Data Right is that consumers should be empowered. This goal will not be achieved if the net effect of the Open Data regime is that a much larger amount of Australian consumers’ personal information is collected, processed and disclosed in a way that exacerbates inequalities in bargaining power, information asymmetries, discriminatory treatment and exclusion of vulnerable groups, especially if their existing exposure to risk without an effective remedy is not addressed. It is unsafe to promote a revolutionary increase in the exposure of the personal information of Australians without proportionate increases in the currently deficient legal protection of that personal information. This submission advocates increased substantive privacy protections, broader application of those protections, greater supervisory, investigative and representative powers for the relevant regulator, and penalties which are sufficient to achieve appropriate deterrence.","PeriodicalId":179517,"journal":{"name":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Joint Submission to Treasury on the Open Banking Review Final Report\",\"authors\":\"Katharine Kemp, D. Vaile\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3150138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This submission responds to the Final Report of the Review into Open Banking in Australia released by Treasury on 9 February 2018. The proposed ‘Open Banking’ regime, if implemented, will be the first incarnation of the broader ‘Open Data’ regime proposed for Australia. The Productivity Commission recommended the enactment of a ‘Consumer Data Right’ to secure the necessary ‘social licence’ for the greatly increasing collection and disclosure of personal information contemplated as part of the proposed ‘Open Data’ regime. The stated goal of the Consumer Data Right is that consumers should be empowered. This goal will not be achieved if the net effect of the Open Data regime is that a much larger amount of Australian consumers’ personal information is collected, processed and disclosed in a way that exacerbates inequalities in bargaining power, information asymmetries, discriminatory treatment and exclusion of vulnerable groups, especially if their existing exposure to risk without an effective remedy is not addressed. It is unsafe to promote a revolutionary increase in the exposure of the personal information of Australians without proportionate increases in the currently deficient legal protection of that personal information. This submission advocates increased substantive privacy protections, broader application of those protections, greater supervisory, investigative and representative powers for the relevant regulator, and penalties which are sufficient to achieve appropriate deterrence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Privacy Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Privacy Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3150138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3150138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本意见书回应了财政部于2018年2月9日发布的《澳大利亚开放银行审查最终报告》。拟议的“开放银行”制度,如果实施,将成为澳大利亚更广泛的“开放数据”制度的第一个化身。生产力促进委员会建议制定一项“消费者资料权”,以确保必要的“社会许可证”,以确保作为拟议的“开放数据”制度的一部分,个人资料的收集和披露将大幅增加。消费者数据权的既定目标是赋予消费者权力。如果开放数据制度的净影响是,以一种加剧议价能力不平等、信息不对称、歧视性待遇和排斥弱势群体的方式收集、处理和披露大量澳大利亚消费者的个人信息,特别是如果他们目前面临的风险没有得到有效补救,这一目标将无法实现。促进澳大利亚人个人信息暴露的革命性增加,而不对目前缺乏的个人信息的法律保护进行相应的增加,是不安全的。该意见书主张增加实质性隐私保护,更广泛地应用这些保护,为相关监管机构提供更大的监督、调查和代表权力,以及足以实现适当威慑的惩罚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Joint Submission to Treasury on the Open Banking Review Final Report
This submission responds to the Final Report of the Review into Open Banking in Australia released by Treasury on 9 February 2018. The proposed ‘Open Banking’ regime, if implemented, will be the first incarnation of the broader ‘Open Data’ regime proposed for Australia. The Productivity Commission recommended the enactment of a ‘Consumer Data Right’ to secure the necessary ‘social licence’ for the greatly increasing collection and disclosure of personal information contemplated as part of the proposed ‘Open Data’ regime. The stated goal of the Consumer Data Right is that consumers should be empowered. This goal will not be achieved if the net effect of the Open Data regime is that a much larger amount of Australian consumers’ personal information is collected, processed and disclosed in a way that exacerbates inequalities in bargaining power, information asymmetries, discriminatory treatment and exclusion of vulnerable groups, especially if their existing exposure to risk without an effective remedy is not addressed. It is unsafe to promote a revolutionary increase in the exposure of the personal information of Australians without proportionate increases in the currently deficient legal protection of that personal information. This submission advocates increased substantive privacy protections, broader application of those protections, greater supervisory, investigative and representative powers for the relevant regulator, and penalties which are sufficient to achieve appropriate deterrence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Policy Responses to Cross-border Central Bank Digital Currencies – Assessing the Transborder Effects of Digital Yuan Artificial Intelligence in the Internet of Health Things: Is the Solution to AI Privacy More AI? Comments on GDPR Enforcement EDPB Decision 01/020 Privacy Rights and Data Security: GDPR and Personal Data Driven Markets Big Boss is Watching You! The Right to Privacy of Employees in the Context of Workplace Surveillance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1