{"title":"电视行业的灵活性、创新和不稳定性","authors":"Paul Dwyer","doi":"10.1017/9789048540150.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In TV production, there has been a worldwide move from a system based on established broadcasters, to a system requiring outsourcing to independent producers. The theory of flexible specialisation suggests this change should increase flexibility and innovation In TV production. Testing these claims in the UK market – which has a large Independent sector and an international reputation for innovative reality TV formats – this chapter find the claims for flexibility and innovation to be largely unsupported by the evidence.","PeriodicalId":435034,"journal":{"name":"Making Media","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexibility, Innovation, and Precarity in the Television Industry\",\"authors\":\"Paul Dwyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9789048540150.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In TV production, there has been a worldwide move from a system based on established broadcasters, to a system requiring outsourcing to independent producers. The theory of flexible specialisation suggests this change should increase flexibility and innovation In TV production. Testing these claims in the UK market – which has a large Independent sector and an international reputation for innovative reality TV formats – this chapter find the claims for flexibility and innovation to be largely unsupported by the evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":435034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Making Media\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Making Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048540150.026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Making Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048540150.026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Flexibility, Innovation, and Precarity in the Television Industry
In TV production, there has been a worldwide move from a system based on established broadcasters, to a system requiring outsourcing to independent producers. The theory of flexible specialisation suggests this change should increase flexibility and innovation In TV production. Testing these claims in the UK market – which has a large Independent sector and an international reputation for innovative reality TV formats – this chapter find the claims for flexibility and innovation to be largely unsupported by the evidence.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
