邦吉的因果关系和经济规律

Alexander Slutsky
{"title":"邦吉的因果关系和经济规律","authors":"Alexander Slutsky","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3383942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with the analysis of the nature of economic relations from the perspective of Mario Bunge’s idea of causality. According to Bunge, causality cannot be regarded as the universal connection of phenomena. The application of Bunge’s concept to economics leads to the development of the hypothesis of the non-causal determination of economic phenomena. The contradiction between the non-causal nature of economic phenomena and the dominant causal paradigm in economic theory are shown and discussed. The hypothesis of non-causal determinations allows to explain an ongoing argument between monetarists and Keynesians, the viability of the different schools of economic thought, the existence of the radical criticism of neoclassical economics, the isolation of economic theory from applied economic disciplines.","PeriodicalId":226815,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy & Methodology of Economics eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bunge’s Causality and the Laws of Economics\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Slutsky\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3383942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper deals with the analysis of the nature of economic relations from the perspective of Mario Bunge’s idea of causality. According to Bunge, causality cannot be regarded as the universal connection of phenomena. The application of Bunge’s concept to economics leads to the development of the hypothesis of the non-causal determination of economic phenomena. The contradiction between the non-causal nature of economic phenomena and the dominant causal paradigm in economic theory are shown and discussed. The hypothesis of non-causal determinations allows to explain an ongoing argument between monetarists and Keynesians, the viability of the different schools of economic thought, the existence of the radical criticism of neoclassical economics, the isolation of economic theory from applied economic disciplines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":226815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy & Methodology of Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy & Methodology of Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3383942\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy & Methodology of Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3383942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从马里奥·邦格的因果关系观出发,对经济关系的本质进行了分析。根据邦格的观点,因果关系不能被视为现象之间的普遍联系。邦格的概念在经济学中的应用导致了经济现象的非因果决定假说的发展。揭示并讨论了经济现象的非因果性与经济理论中占主导地位的因果范式之间的矛盾。非因果决定的假设可以解释货币主义者和凯恩斯主义者之间正在进行的争论,不同经济思想流派的可行性,对新古典经济学的激进批评的存在,以及经济理论与应用经济学科的隔离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bunge’s Causality and the Laws of Economics
This paper deals with the analysis of the nature of economic relations from the perspective of Mario Bunge’s idea of causality. According to Bunge, causality cannot be regarded as the universal connection of phenomena. The application of Bunge’s concept to economics leads to the development of the hypothesis of the non-causal determination of economic phenomena. The contradiction between the non-causal nature of economic phenomena and the dominant causal paradigm in economic theory are shown and discussed. The hypothesis of non-causal determinations allows to explain an ongoing argument between monetarists and Keynesians, the viability of the different schools of economic thought, the existence of the radical criticism of neoclassical economics, the isolation of economic theory from applied economic disciplines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"The Eyes and Ears of the Agricultural Markets": A History of Information in Interwar Agricultural Economics Deepening and Widening Social Identity Analysis in Economics In Search of Santa Claus: Samuelson, Stigler, and Coase Theorem Worlds Reports from China: Joan Robinson as Observer and Travel Writer, 1953-78 Introduction to a Symposium on Carl Menger on the Centenary of his Death
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1