在小组讨论中自动识别意见领袖

Yujeung Ho, Hao-Min Liu, Hui-Hsin Hsu, Chun-Han Lin, Yao-Hua Ho, Ling-Jyh Chen
{"title":"在小组讨论中自动识别意见领袖","authors":"Yujeung Ho, Hao-Min Liu, Hui-Hsin Hsu, Chun-Han Lin, Yao-Hua Ho, Ling-Jyh Chen","doi":"10.1109/TAAI.2016.7880177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we propose an efficient approach to identify the opinion leader from group discussion. This approach is able to recognize the opinion leader without analyzing semantic and syntactic features, which may cost a lot more computing effort. We firstly propose algorithms to evaluate the degree of participation and the emotion expression from the speaking of each member during group discussion. Moreover, by conducting lab-scale experiment, a well-trained model, which is tested on single dataset as well as on cross dataset, is obtained to recognize the opinion leader. Finally, we conduct a field experiment to evaluate the proposed system in a real world setting. The results show that the accuracy of opinion leader identification could achieve to 94.68% on Berlin dataset, 76% on Youtube data and 73.33% on live group discussion. Thus, with this simple and efficient system, opinion leader can be successfully identified in various conditions.","PeriodicalId":159858,"journal":{"name":"2016 Conference on Technologies and Applications of Artificial Intelligence (TAAI)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automatic opinion leader recognition in group discussions\",\"authors\":\"Yujeung Ho, Hao-Min Liu, Hui-Hsin Hsu, Chun-Han Lin, Yao-Hua Ho, Ling-Jyh Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TAAI.2016.7880177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we propose an efficient approach to identify the opinion leader from group discussion. This approach is able to recognize the opinion leader without analyzing semantic and syntactic features, which may cost a lot more computing effort. We firstly propose algorithms to evaluate the degree of participation and the emotion expression from the speaking of each member during group discussion. Moreover, by conducting lab-scale experiment, a well-trained model, which is tested on single dataset as well as on cross dataset, is obtained to recognize the opinion leader. Finally, we conduct a field experiment to evaluate the proposed system in a real world setting. The results show that the accuracy of opinion leader identification could achieve to 94.68% on Berlin dataset, 76% on Youtube data and 73.33% on live group discussion. Thus, with this simple and efficient system, opinion leader can be successfully identified in various conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Conference on Technologies and Applications of Artificial Intelligence (TAAI)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Conference on Technologies and Applications of Artificial Intelligence (TAAI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAAI.2016.7880177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Conference on Technologies and Applications of Artificial Intelligence (TAAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAAI.2016.7880177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了一种从小组讨论中识别意见领袖的有效方法。这种方法能够在不分析语义和句法特征的情况下识别意见领袖,但可能会花费更多的计算工作量。我们首先提出了从小组讨论中每个成员的发言来评估参与程度和情感表达的算法。此外,通过实验室规模的实验,得到了训练良好的意见领袖识别模型,并在单数据集和跨数据集上进行了测试。最后,我们进行了一个现场实验,以评估在现实世界设置提出的系统。结果表明,在Berlin数据集上,意见领袖识别的准确率可以达到94.68%,在Youtube数据上可以达到76%,在现场小组讨论上可以达到73.33%。因此,通过这个简单有效的系统,可以在各种情况下成功地识别意见领袖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Automatic opinion leader recognition in group discussions
In this paper, we propose an efficient approach to identify the opinion leader from group discussion. This approach is able to recognize the opinion leader without analyzing semantic and syntactic features, which may cost a lot more computing effort. We firstly propose algorithms to evaluate the degree of participation and the emotion expression from the speaking of each member during group discussion. Moreover, by conducting lab-scale experiment, a well-trained model, which is tested on single dataset as well as on cross dataset, is obtained to recognize the opinion leader. Finally, we conduct a field experiment to evaluate the proposed system in a real world setting. The results show that the accuracy of opinion leader identification could achieve to 94.68% on Berlin dataset, 76% on Youtube data and 73.33% on live group discussion. Thus, with this simple and efficient system, opinion leader can be successfully identified in various conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A cluster-based opinion leader discovery in social network User behavior analysis and commodity recommendation for point-earning apps Extraction of proper names from myanmar text using latent dirichlet allocation Heuristic algorithm for target coverage with connectivity fault-tolerance problem in wireless sensor networks AFIS: Aligning detail-pages for full schema induction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1