{"title":"P06建立钙评分新分界线","authors":"C. Józsa, E. Cheasty","doi":"10.1136/HEARTJNL-2020-BSCI.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction CT coronary angiography (CTCA) is the preferred test in patients with low to intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease. This retrospective study was conducted to determine a new cut for calcium score without adversely affecting the diagnostic accuracy of CTCA. Methods CTCA was performed on a third generation dual-source CT scanner (Siemens Force 512 slice). Agatston method was used for the quantification of the coronary artery calcium. The degree of luminal narrowing was classified using the CAD-RAD scoring system. The coronary plaques were classified into calcified, non-calcified and mixed subtypes. We reviewed the results of any subsequent non-invasive (stress echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging) and invasive (coronary angiography) tests to assess the correlation with CTCA. Results 296 patients were included in the analysis. 22% (64/296) did not go on to further investigations. 78% (232/296) underwent non-invasive or invasive tests. The correlation of CTCA with further investigations did not depend on total calcium score. 76% of CTCAs correlated with further investigations, 5% did not correlate and 19% had inconclusive results. (Multiple artefacts preventing complete CTCA interpretation). Conclusion The correlation or non-correlation of the CTCA results with further investigations was not affected by the total calcium score. Therefore we deem it is reasonable to proceed with a CTCA even when the calcium score exceeds 1000.","PeriodicalId":383700,"journal":{"name":"Scientific poster abstracts","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P06 Establishing a new cut off of calcium score\",\"authors\":\"C. Józsa, E. Cheasty\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/HEARTJNL-2020-BSCI.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction CT coronary angiography (CTCA) is the preferred test in patients with low to intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease. This retrospective study was conducted to determine a new cut for calcium score without adversely affecting the diagnostic accuracy of CTCA. Methods CTCA was performed on a third generation dual-source CT scanner (Siemens Force 512 slice). Agatston method was used for the quantification of the coronary artery calcium. The degree of luminal narrowing was classified using the CAD-RAD scoring system. The coronary plaques were classified into calcified, non-calcified and mixed subtypes. We reviewed the results of any subsequent non-invasive (stress echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging) and invasive (coronary angiography) tests to assess the correlation with CTCA. Results 296 patients were included in the analysis. 22% (64/296) did not go on to further investigations. 78% (232/296) underwent non-invasive or invasive tests. The correlation of CTCA with further investigations did not depend on total calcium score. 76% of CTCAs correlated with further investigations, 5% did not correlate and 19% had inconclusive results. (Multiple artefacts preventing complete CTCA interpretation). Conclusion The correlation or non-correlation of the CTCA results with further investigations was not affected by the total calcium score. Therefore we deem it is reasonable to proceed with a CTCA even when the calcium score exceeds 1000.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific poster abstracts\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific poster abstracts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/HEARTJNL-2020-BSCI.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific poster abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/HEARTJNL-2020-BSCI.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
CT冠状动脉造影(CTCA)是低到中等可能性冠状动脉疾病患者的首选检查。本回顾性研究旨在确定一种不影响CTCA诊断准确性的钙评分新方法。方法在第三代双源CT扫描仪(Siemens Force 512层)上进行CTCA。冠状动脉钙定量采用Agatston法。采用CAD-RAD评分系统对管腔狭窄程度进行分类。冠状动脉斑块分为钙化型、非钙化型和混合型。我们回顾了所有随后的非侵入性(应激超声心动图、心脏磁共振灌注成像)和侵入性(冠状动脉造影)试验的结果,以评估与CTCA的相关性。结果296例患者纳入分析。22%(64/296)未进行进一步调查。78%(232/296)接受了非侵入性或侵入性检查。CTCA与进一步检查的相关性不依赖于总钙评分。76%的ctca与进一步调查相关,5%不相关,19%结果不确定。(多重伪影妨碍完整的CTCA解释)。结论CTCA结果与进一步检查的相关或不相关不受总钙评分的影响。因此,我们认为即使钙评分超过1000,也可以进行CTCA检查。
Introduction CT coronary angiography (CTCA) is the preferred test in patients with low to intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease. This retrospective study was conducted to determine a new cut for calcium score without adversely affecting the diagnostic accuracy of CTCA. Methods CTCA was performed on a third generation dual-source CT scanner (Siemens Force 512 slice). Agatston method was used for the quantification of the coronary artery calcium. The degree of luminal narrowing was classified using the CAD-RAD scoring system. The coronary plaques were classified into calcified, non-calcified and mixed subtypes. We reviewed the results of any subsequent non-invasive (stress echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging) and invasive (coronary angiography) tests to assess the correlation with CTCA. Results 296 patients were included in the analysis. 22% (64/296) did not go on to further investigations. 78% (232/296) underwent non-invasive or invasive tests. The correlation of CTCA with further investigations did not depend on total calcium score. 76% of CTCAs correlated with further investigations, 5% did not correlate and 19% had inconclusive results. (Multiple artefacts preventing complete CTCA interpretation). Conclusion The correlation or non-correlation of the CTCA results with further investigations was not affected by the total calcium score. Therefore we deem it is reasonable to proceed with a CTCA even when the calcium score exceeds 1000.