看一下XML文件

A. Markus
{"title":"看一下XML文件","authors":"A. Markus","doi":"10.1145/1044586.1044587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software engineering seems to be ridden with hypes: someone launches a \"new\" idea, a lot of noise is made over that in the various journals which leads the casual reader or listener to believe that all previous ideas are very wrong or at least completely ancient and therefore useless. The new idea inspires the creation or resurrection of a bunch of TLAs and FLAs and other buzzwords. But after a while the hype is gone and the new idea is either forgotten or becomes an old and more or less well-understood tool - one of many and not one instead of many.","PeriodicalId":379614,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGPLAN Fortran Forum","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Have a look at XML files\",\"authors\":\"A. Markus\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1044586.1044587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software engineering seems to be ridden with hypes: someone launches a \\\"new\\\" idea, a lot of noise is made over that in the various journals which leads the casual reader or listener to believe that all previous ideas are very wrong or at least completely ancient and therefore useless. The new idea inspires the creation or resurrection of a bunch of TLAs and FLAs and other buzzwords. But after a while the hype is gone and the new idea is either forgotten or becomes an old and more or less well-understood tool - one of many and not one instead of many.\",\"PeriodicalId\":379614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM SIGPLAN Fortran Forum\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM SIGPLAN Fortran Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1044586.1044587\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGPLAN Fortran Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1044586.1044587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

软件工程似乎充满了炒作:有人提出了一个“新”想法,各种各样的期刊上对这个想法产生了大量的噪音,这使得偶然的读者或听众相信所有以前的想法都是非常错误的,或者至少是完全过时的,因此毫无用处。这个新想法激发了一堆tla和fla以及其他流行语的创造或复活。但过了一段时间,炒作就消失了,新想法要么被遗忘,要么成为一种古老的、或多或少被理解的工具——众多工具之一,而不是众多工具中的一个。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Have a look at XML files
Software engineering seems to be ridden with hypes: someone launches a "new" idea, a lot of noise is made over that in the various journals which leads the casual reader or listener to believe that all previous ideas are very wrong or at least completely ancient and therefore useless. The new idea inspires the creation or resurrection of a bunch of TLAs and FLAs and other buzzwords. But after a while the hype is gone and the new idea is either forgotten or becomes an old and more or less well-understood tool - one of many and not one instead of many.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Compiler Support for the Fortran 2008 and 2018 Standards The diagnostic capability of the Cray, gfortran, Intel, Nag and Oracle Fortran compilers The diagnostic capability of the Cray, gfortran, Intel, Nag and Oracle Fortran compilers Experimenting with generic programming features History of Fortran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1