三级医院剖宫产麻醉实践:回顾性观察研究

Rohini Sigdel, M. Lama, Sanish Gurung, S. Timilsina
{"title":"三级医院剖宫产麻醉实践:回顾性观察研究","authors":"Rohini Sigdel, M. Lama, Sanish Gurung, S. Timilsina","doi":"10.3126/mjpahs.v1i1.22452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Regional anesthesia is being utilized as the preferred anesthetic technique for cesarean delivery worldwide. This study was performed to review cesarean delivery anesthetic practice in our institute which represents a tertiary care regional hospital. \nMethods: Data was collected regarding the number of cesarean delivery performed during the period of six months from January 2017 to June 2017 at Western Regional Hospital. Number of elective versus emergency cesarean delivery, mode of anesthesia and the reason for general anesthesia and complications was recorded. \nResults: The number of cesarean delivery was found to be 1174(26.41%) of total deliveries during the study period. Out of which, 64.82% were for emergency indication and 35.18% were elective cesarean delivery. Spinal anesthesia was utilized in 99.03% of elective cesarean section and 97.63% of emergency cesarean section. The percentage of cases performed under general anesthesia was 1.87%. Reasons for general anesthesia included inadequate subarachnoid block, fetal malpresentation, eclampsia and maternal comorbidities. Complications related to general anesthesia like failed intubation, airway difficulty related to general anesthesia and anesthesia related mortality was not encountered. \nConclusion: Spinal anesthesia is utilized widely and safely in obstetric practice at our hospital. Use of labour epidural analgesia should be introduced and encouraged in our setting to minimize the side effects of single shot spinal anesthesia and to avoid general anesthesia when indicated.","PeriodicalId":256896,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Pokhara Academy of Health Sciences","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anesthesia practice in cesarean delivery in tertiary care hospital: a retrospective observational study\",\"authors\":\"Rohini Sigdel, M. Lama, Sanish Gurung, S. Timilsina\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/mjpahs.v1i1.22452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Regional anesthesia is being utilized as the preferred anesthetic technique for cesarean delivery worldwide. This study was performed to review cesarean delivery anesthetic practice in our institute which represents a tertiary care regional hospital. \\nMethods: Data was collected regarding the number of cesarean delivery performed during the period of six months from January 2017 to June 2017 at Western Regional Hospital. Number of elective versus emergency cesarean delivery, mode of anesthesia and the reason for general anesthesia and complications was recorded. \\nResults: The number of cesarean delivery was found to be 1174(26.41%) of total deliveries during the study period. Out of which, 64.82% were for emergency indication and 35.18% were elective cesarean delivery. Spinal anesthesia was utilized in 99.03% of elective cesarean section and 97.63% of emergency cesarean section. The percentage of cases performed under general anesthesia was 1.87%. Reasons for general anesthesia included inadequate subarachnoid block, fetal malpresentation, eclampsia and maternal comorbidities. Complications related to general anesthesia like failed intubation, airway difficulty related to general anesthesia and anesthesia related mortality was not encountered. \\nConclusion: Spinal anesthesia is utilized widely and safely in obstetric practice at our hospital. Use of labour epidural analgesia should be introduced and encouraged in our setting to minimize the side effects of single shot spinal anesthesia and to avoid general anesthesia when indicated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Pokhara Academy of Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Pokhara Academy of Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/mjpahs.v1i1.22452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Pokhara Academy of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/mjpahs.v1i1.22452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:在世界范围内,区域麻醉被用作剖宫产的首选麻醉技术。本研究是为了回顾剖宫产麻醉实践在我们研究所代表三级保健地区医院。方法:收集西部地区医院2017年1月至2017年6月6个月剖宫产手术的数据。记录择期剖宫产与急诊剖宫产的数量、麻醉方式、全麻原因及并发症。结果:研究期间剖宫产1174例,占总分娩数的26.41%。其中急诊指征占64.82%,择期剖宫产占35.18%。选择性剖宫产的99.03%和急诊剖宫产的97.63%采用了脊髓麻醉。全麻下手术占1.87%。全麻的原因包括蛛网膜下腔阻滞不足、胎儿畸形、子痫和母体合并症。与全身麻醉相关的并发症如插管失败、与全身麻醉相关的气道困难和与麻醉相关的死亡率均未发生。结论:脊髓麻醉在我院产科实践中应用广泛、安全。在我们的情况下,应引入并鼓励使用分娩硬膜外镇痛,以尽量减少单针脊髓麻醉的副作用,并避免在需要时全身麻醉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anesthesia practice in cesarean delivery in tertiary care hospital: a retrospective observational study
Background: Regional anesthesia is being utilized as the preferred anesthetic technique for cesarean delivery worldwide. This study was performed to review cesarean delivery anesthetic practice in our institute which represents a tertiary care regional hospital. Methods: Data was collected regarding the number of cesarean delivery performed during the period of six months from January 2017 to June 2017 at Western Regional Hospital. Number of elective versus emergency cesarean delivery, mode of anesthesia and the reason for general anesthesia and complications was recorded. Results: The number of cesarean delivery was found to be 1174(26.41%) of total deliveries during the study period. Out of which, 64.82% were for emergency indication and 35.18% were elective cesarean delivery. Spinal anesthesia was utilized in 99.03% of elective cesarean section and 97.63% of emergency cesarean section. The percentage of cases performed under general anesthesia was 1.87%. Reasons for general anesthesia included inadequate subarachnoid block, fetal malpresentation, eclampsia and maternal comorbidities. Complications related to general anesthesia like failed intubation, airway difficulty related to general anesthesia and anesthesia related mortality was not encountered. Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia is utilized widely and safely in obstetric practice at our hospital. Use of labour epidural analgesia should be introduced and encouraged in our setting to minimize the side effects of single shot spinal anesthesia and to avoid general anesthesia when indicated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Study Anelgesic Efficacy of Intra-Thecal Tramadol as a Spinal Adjunct to 0.5% Heavy Bupivacaine in Lower Abdominal Surgery Adherence to Buprenorphine Maintenance Treatment Program in Western Nepal Medico Legal Cases in One Stop Crisis Management Center (OCMC) Kaski Effectiveness of Prenatal Ultrasound Examination at Second Trimester in Detecting Fetal Congenital Abnormalities-A Preliminary Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1