女权主义者给特朗普的推文:如何在多样性中找到共同点

Sally L. Kitch
{"title":"女权主义者给特朗普的推文:如何在多样性中找到共同点","authors":"Sally L. Kitch","doi":"10.31390/TABOO.17.2.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2016 U.S. presidential campaign and first year of the Trump presidency have defied conventional politics in multiple ways. Among the many shocking deviations from modern political normalcy has been Donald Trump’s appeal to a sizeable minority of the American electorate, especially in rural and post-indus-trial areas, to hitch their hopes for American greatness on stressing racial, class, religious, ethnic, and gender differences among citizens and pitting the interests of immigrants and foreign powers against those of a genuine (white) America. At this moment, it seems crucial to strategize ways to mend America’s shredded social fabric. “Feminist Tweets to Trump” offers models for pursuing that goal from an unexpected source: feminist theory and activism. There are few social movements or theoretical perspectives besides feminism that can offer so many robust examples of paradigms, frameworks, and mechanisms for conceptualizing and actualizing connections among groups and for seeking common purpose, both despite and through substantial differences in identities, experiences, and social locations. Feminist connection strategies include: (1) challenging rigid binary thinking about sexuality and gender difference; (2) recognizing how racial divides map onto hierarchies of power and status and undermining both through non-oppositional identity politics, intersectionality, and mestiza consciousness; and (3) finding commonality across nations and geographical regions by exposing shared structural relations and the invisible political histories that link people who otherwise share few life experiences, practices, identities, or cultural values.","PeriodicalId":279537,"journal":{"name":"Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feminist Tweets to Trump: How to Find Commonality in Diversity\",\"authors\":\"Sally L. Kitch\",\"doi\":\"10.31390/TABOO.17.2.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 2016 U.S. presidential campaign and first year of the Trump presidency have defied conventional politics in multiple ways. Among the many shocking deviations from modern political normalcy has been Donald Trump’s appeal to a sizeable minority of the American electorate, especially in rural and post-indus-trial areas, to hitch their hopes for American greatness on stressing racial, class, religious, ethnic, and gender differences among citizens and pitting the interests of immigrants and foreign powers against those of a genuine (white) America. At this moment, it seems crucial to strategize ways to mend America’s shredded social fabric. “Feminist Tweets to Trump” offers models for pursuing that goal from an unexpected source: feminist theory and activism. There are few social movements or theoretical perspectives besides feminism that can offer so many robust examples of paradigms, frameworks, and mechanisms for conceptualizing and actualizing connections among groups and for seeking common purpose, both despite and through substantial differences in identities, experiences, and social locations. Feminist connection strategies include: (1) challenging rigid binary thinking about sexuality and gender difference; (2) recognizing how racial divides map onto hierarchies of power and status and undermining both through non-oppositional identity politics, intersectionality, and mestiza consciousness; and (3) finding commonality across nations and geographical regions by exposing shared structural relations and the invisible political histories that link people who otherwise share few life experiences, practices, identities, or cultural values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":279537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31390/TABOO.17.2.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31390/TABOO.17.2.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

2016年美国总统竞选和特朗普总统任期的第一年在多个方面挑战了传统政治。在与现代政治常态的许多令人震惊的偏差中,唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)呼吁相当多的美国少数选民,尤其是农村和后工业地区的选民,把他们对美国伟大的希望寄托在强调公民之间的种族、阶级、宗教、民族和性别差异上,并将移民和外国势力的利益与真正的(白人)美国的利益对立起来。在这个时刻,制定策略修补美国支离破碎的社会结构似乎至关重要。《女权主义者给特朗普的推文》为实现这一目标提供了一个意想不到的模式:女权主义理论和行动主义。除了女权主义之外,很少有社会运动或理论观点能够提供如此多的范例、框架和机制来概念化和实现群体之间的联系,并寻求共同目标,尽管身份、经验和社会位置存在巨大差异。女性主义连接策略包括:(1)挑战关于性与性别差异的刻板二元思维;(2)认识到种族划分如何映射到权力和地位的等级,并通过非对立的身份政治、交叉性和混血儿意识破坏两者;(3)通过揭示共同的结构关系和无形的政治历史,发现国家和地理区域之间的共性,这些政治历史将那些几乎没有共同的生活经历、实践、身份或文化价值观的人联系在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feminist Tweets to Trump: How to Find Commonality in Diversity
The 2016 U.S. presidential campaign and first year of the Trump presidency have defied conventional politics in multiple ways. Among the many shocking deviations from modern political normalcy has been Donald Trump’s appeal to a sizeable minority of the American electorate, especially in rural and post-indus-trial areas, to hitch their hopes for American greatness on stressing racial, class, religious, ethnic, and gender differences among citizens and pitting the interests of immigrants and foreign powers against those of a genuine (white) America. At this moment, it seems crucial to strategize ways to mend America’s shredded social fabric. “Feminist Tweets to Trump” offers models for pursuing that goal from an unexpected source: feminist theory and activism. There are few social movements or theoretical perspectives besides feminism that can offer so many robust examples of paradigms, frameworks, and mechanisms for conceptualizing and actualizing connections among groups and for seeking common purpose, both despite and through substantial differences in identities, experiences, and social locations. Feminist connection strategies include: (1) challenging rigid binary thinking about sexuality and gender difference; (2) recognizing how racial divides map onto hierarchies of power and status and undermining both through non-oppositional identity politics, intersectionality, and mestiza consciousness; and (3) finding commonality across nations and geographical regions by exposing shared structural relations and the invisible political histories that link people who otherwise share few life experiences, practices, identities, or cultural values.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Latinx Youth Counterstories in a Court Diversion Program Introduction: School-to-Prison Pipeline Special Issue Special Issue School-to-Prison Pipeline Seen But Not Heard: Personal Narratives of Systemic Failure Within the School-to-Prison Pipeline Using Double Consciousness as an Analytic Tool to Discuss the Decision Making of Black School Leaders in Disrupting the School-to-Prison Pipeline
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1