工人、绅士与地主:《教授》与《呼啸山庄》中的社会阶级辨明

Neville F. Newman
{"title":"工人、绅士与地主:《教授》与《呼啸山庄》中的社会阶级辨明","authors":"Neville F. Newman","doi":"10.1179/030977601794173196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article interrogates class definition in two nineteenth-century novels: Emily Brontë's Wuthering Heights, and Charlotte Brontë's The Professor. In my analysis of The Professor I draw attention to Charlotte Brontë's preface as a point of departure from which to criticize the novel's ostensible realism. In Wuthering Heights, I argue, certain characters masquerade as members of the working class while signifying something much different. I show that whereas Wuthering Heights conceals within it a nostalgic desirefor an England where the industrial working class as an identifiable, organizable body does not yet exist, in The Professor it is precisely their existence that constitutes that novel's 'not said.' I conclude by arguing that on the one hand Emily Brontë contains her unease by retreating into the past, whereas Charlotte Brontë evidences an unease with a sector of society whose existence can never be disputed. She camouflages it not only by privileging the virtues of capitalism but also by showing that it is members of the capitalist class that will inherit an idealized and sanitized England.","PeriodicalId":230905,"journal":{"name":"Brontë Society Transactions","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Workers, Gentlemen and Landowners: Identifying Social Class in The Professor and Wuthering Heights\",\"authors\":\"Neville F. Newman\",\"doi\":\"10.1179/030977601794173196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article interrogates class definition in two nineteenth-century novels: Emily Brontë's Wuthering Heights, and Charlotte Brontë's The Professor. In my analysis of The Professor I draw attention to Charlotte Brontë's preface as a point of departure from which to criticize the novel's ostensible realism. In Wuthering Heights, I argue, certain characters masquerade as members of the working class while signifying something much different. I show that whereas Wuthering Heights conceals within it a nostalgic desirefor an England where the industrial working class as an identifiable, organizable body does not yet exist, in The Professor it is precisely their existence that constitutes that novel's 'not said.' I conclude by arguing that on the one hand Emily Brontë contains her unease by retreating into the past, whereas Charlotte Brontë evidences an unease with a sector of society whose existence can never be disputed. She camouflages it not only by privileging the virtues of capitalism but also by showing that it is members of the capitalist class that will inherit an idealized and sanitized England.\",\"PeriodicalId\":230905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brontë Society Transactions\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brontë Society Transactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1179/030977601794173196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brontë Society Transactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/030977601794173196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文考察了两部19世纪小说中的阶级定义:艾米莉Brontë的《呼啸山庄》和夏洛特Brontë的《教授》。在我对《教授》的分析中,我提请注意夏洛特Brontë的序言,以此作为批评小说表面现实主义的出发点。我认为,在《呼啸山庄》中,某些人物伪装成工人阶级的成员,却表达了截然不同的含义。我指出,尽管《呼啸山庄》隐藏着一种对英国的怀旧渴望,在那里工业工人阶级作为一个可识别的,有组织的群体还不存在,但在《教授》中,正是他们的存在构成了小说的“未说”。我的结论是,一方面,艾米丽Brontë通过退回到过去来遏制她的不安,而夏洛特Brontë则表明了她对社会中一个永远不会存在争议的部分的不安。她不仅通过对资本主义优点的特权加以掩饰,而且通过表明将继承一个理想化和净化的英国的是资产阶级的成员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Workers, Gentlemen and Landowners: Identifying Social Class in The Professor and Wuthering Heights
Abstract This article interrogates class definition in two nineteenth-century novels: Emily Brontë's Wuthering Heights, and Charlotte Brontë's The Professor. In my analysis of The Professor I draw attention to Charlotte Brontë's preface as a point of departure from which to criticize the novel's ostensible realism. In Wuthering Heights, I argue, certain characters masquerade as members of the working class while signifying something much different. I show that whereas Wuthering Heights conceals within it a nostalgic desirefor an England where the industrial working class as an identifiable, organizable body does not yet exist, in The Professor it is precisely their existence that constitutes that novel's 'not said.' I conclude by arguing that on the one hand Emily Brontë contains her unease by retreating into the past, whereas Charlotte Brontë evidences an unease with a sector of society whose existence can never be disputed. She camouflages it not only by privileging the virtues of capitalism but also by showing that it is members of the capitalist class that will inherit an idealized and sanitized England.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pennine Landscapes in Jane Eyre and Wuthering Heights Narrative Cross-Dressing in Charlotte Brontë's The Professor Mary Taylor: 'More Precious Than Rubies' Brontë Society Literary Luncheon Lecture, 7 April 2001. 2001 Annual Brontë Lecture New Publishing Arrangements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1