日本多地区临床试验评估生存终点的样本量计算方法的再检验

N. Hayashi, Y. Itoh
{"title":"日本多地区临床试验评估生存终点的样本量计算方法的再检验","authors":"N. Hayashi, Y. Itoh","doi":"10.5691/JJB.38.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In planning a multi-regional clinical trial including Japan, the sample size for Japanese patients is often considered based on the probability of obtaining a consistent result between Japanese subpopulation and the overall study population, as recommended in the Japanese guideline “Basic Principles on Global Clinical Trials.” We review the commonly used existing method for Japanese sample size calculation based on obtaining a consistent result for survival endpoint. Through simulations, we note that Japanese sample size based on the existing method tended to have less actual power than the nominal power for consistency, especially when there is a large treatment effect. We propose alternative methods based on the delta method and numerical integrations. Our proposed methods give similar Japanese sample sizes, and our simulation studies show that our proposed methods provide the actual power close to the nominal power for consistency.","PeriodicalId":365545,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of biometrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Re-examination of Japanese Sample Size Calculation for Multi-regional Clinical Trial Evaluating Survival Endpoint\",\"authors\":\"N. Hayashi, Y. Itoh\",\"doi\":\"10.5691/JJB.38.79\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In planning a multi-regional clinical trial including Japan, the sample size for Japanese patients is often considered based on the probability of obtaining a consistent result between Japanese subpopulation and the overall study population, as recommended in the Japanese guideline “Basic Principles on Global Clinical Trials.” We review the commonly used existing method for Japanese sample size calculation based on obtaining a consistent result for survival endpoint. Through simulations, we note that Japanese sample size based on the existing method tended to have less actual power than the nominal power for consistency, especially when there is a large treatment effect. We propose alternative methods based on the delta method and numerical integrations. Our proposed methods give similar Japanese sample sizes, and our simulation studies show that our proposed methods provide the actual power close to the nominal power for consistency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese journal of biometrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese journal of biometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5691/JJB.38.79\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5691/JJB.38.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在计划包括日本在内的多地区临床试验时,日本患者的样本量通常是基于在日本亚群和总体研究人群之间获得一致结果的可能性来考虑的,这是日本指南“全球临床试验基本原则”中建议的。在获得一致的生存终点结果的基础上,我们回顾了日本常用的现有样本量计算方法。通过模拟,我们注意到基于现有方法的日本样本量往往具有小于一致性标称功率的实际功率,特别是当有较大的处理效果时。我们提出了基于delta法和数值积分的替代方法。我们提出的方法给出了类似的日本样本量,我们的仿真研究表明,我们提出的方法提供的实际功率接近于标称功率的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Re-examination of Japanese Sample Size Calculation for Multi-regional Clinical Trial Evaluating Survival Endpoint
In planning a multi-regional clinical trial including Japan, the sample size for Japanese patients is often considered based on the probability of obtaining a consistent result between Japanese subpopulation and the overall study population, as recommended in the Japanese guideline “Basic Principles on Global Clinical Trials.” We review the commonly used existing method for Japanese sample size calculation based on obtaining a consistent result for survival endpoint. Through simulations, we note that Japanese sample size based on the existing method tended to have less actual power than the nominal power for consistency, especially when there is a large treatment effect. We propose alternative methods based on the delta method and numerical integrations. Our proposed methods give similar Japanese sample sizes, and our simulation studies show that our proposed methods provide the actual power close to the nominal power for consistency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Meta-Analysis for Time-to-event Outcome Based on Restored Individual Participant Data and Summary Statistics Theoretical Examination and Simulation Study on Analyses for Progression Free Survival as Interval-censored Data がん臨床試験と競合リスク・マルチステートモデル Robust and Interpretable Hazard-based Summary Measures of the Magnitude of the Treatment Effect and Their Inference Procedures Bayesian Ridge Estimators Based on Copula-based Joint Prior Distributions: Cox Regression Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1