喀麦隆科学院的循证科学建议模式

D. Mbah, S. Ayonghe, V. Tanya, V. Titanji, Magellan Guewo-Fokeng
{"title":"喀麦隆科学院的循证科学建议模式","authors":"D. Mbah, S. Ayonghe, V. Tanya, V. Titanji, Magellan Guewo-Fokeng","doi":"10.4314/jcas.v15i2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evidence-based science advice (ESA) effort of the Cameroon Academy of Sciences (CAS) since 23 years has been reviewed. The objective throughout has been to enable science influence policy/decision making at all levels – national, regional and global. The key partners of CAS included the United States National Academy of Sciences (USNAS), the German Academy of Sciences (Leopoldina), the Royal Society of United Kingdom, as well as the Network of African Science Academies (NASAC), the InterAcademy Partnership (Science, Health, Research), the Commonwealth Science Academies and the International Science Council. The mechanisms used included consensus studies, workshops, public lectures, participation in sectoral committees, summaries of key scientific publications and joint statements. Priorities handled through convening activities were triggered by policy/decision making sector requests or Academy foresights. The response/impact of the effort varied from media coverage through policy/programme change/orientation. The major challenges faced included insufficient financial/human resources, inadequate office space, and weak links with government. These challenges must be addressed to enable effective evidence-based science advice which is increasingly unavoidable for sustainable development. Keywords: Evidence-based science, advice, policy, decision-maker","PeriodicalId":383706,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Cameroon academy of sciences","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cameroon Academy of Sciences model of evidence-based science advice\",\"authors\":\"D. Mbah, S. Ayonghe, V. Tanya, V. Titanji, Magellan Guewo-Fokeng\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/jcas.v15i2.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The evidence-based science advice (ESA) effort of the Cameroon Academy of Sciences (CAS) since 23 years has been reviewed. The objective throughout has been to enable science influence policy/decision making at all levels – national, regional and global. The key partners of CAS included the United States National Academy of Sciences (USNAS), the German Academy of Sciences (Leopoldina), the Royal Society of United Kingdom, as well as the Network of African Science Academies (NASAC), the InterAcademy Partnership (Science, Health, Research), the Commonwealth Science Academies and the International Science Council. The mechanisms used included consensus studies, workshops, public lectures, participation in sectoral committees, summaries of key scientific publications and joint statements. Priorities handled through convening activities were triggered by policy/decision making sector requests or Academy foresights. The response/impact of the effort varied from media coverage through policy/programme change/orientation. The major challenges faced included insufficient financial/human resources, inadequate office space, and weak links with government. These challenges must be addressed to enable effective evidence-based science advice which is increasingly unavoidable for sustainable development. Keywords: Evidence-based science, advice, policy, decision-maker\",\"PeriodicalId\":383706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Cameroon academy of sciences\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Cameroon academy of sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/jcas.v15i2.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Cameroon academy of sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/jcas.v15i2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对喀麦隆科学院(CAS)23 年来的循证科学建议(ESA)工作进行了审查。其目标始终是使科学能够影响国家、地区和全球各级的政策/决策。喀麦隆科学院的主要合作伙伴包括美国国家科学院(USNAS)、德国科学院 (Leopoldina)、英国皇家学会以及非洲科学院网络(NASAC)、科学院间伙伴关系 (科学、卫生、研究)、英联邦科学院和国际科学理事会。所使用的机制包括共识研究、讲习班、公开讲座、参与部门委员会、重要科学出版物摘要和联合声明。通过召集活动处理的优先事项是由政策/决策部门的要求或科学院的预见引发的。从媒体报道到政策/计划改变/宣传,这些努力的反应/影响各不相同。面临的主要挑战包括财政/人力资源不足、办公空间不足以及与政府的联系薄弱。必须应对这些挑战,才能提供有效的循证科学建议,这对于可持续发展而言越来越不可避免。关键词循证科学、建议、政策、决策者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Cameroon Academy of Sciences model of evidence-based science advice
The evidence-based science advice (ESA) effort of the Cameroon Academy of Sciences (CAS) since 23 years has been reviewed. The objective throughout has been to enable science influence policy/decision making at all levels – national, regional and global. The key partners of CAS included the United States National Academy of Sciences (USNAS), the German Academy of Sciences (Leopoldina), the Royal Society of United Kingdom, as well as the Network of African Science Academies (NASAC), the InterAcademy Partnership (Science, Health, Research), the Commonwealth Science Academies and the International Science Council. The mechanisms used included consensus studies, workshops, public lectures, participation in sectoral committees, summaries of key scientific publications and joint statements. Priorities handled through convening activities were triggered by policy/decision making sector requests or Academy foresights. The response/impact of the effort varied from media coverage through policy/programme change/orientation. The major challenges faced included insufficient financial/human resources, inadequate office space, and weak links with government. These challenges must be addressed to enable effective evidence-based science advice which is increasingly unavoidable for sustainable development. Keywords: Evidence-based science, advice, policy, decision-maker
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mineralogical, geochemical, and physico-mechanical features of Bidzar (North Cameroon) termite mound materials and its suitability in producing fired bricks with marble powder additive Orthographic Errors Analysis of English as a Second Language Learners’ writing: lessons from the use of WhatsApp language Science Advisory to Governments and Regional/Sub-Regional Organizations in West and Central Africa Science Diplomacy in West and Central Africa: State, Trends and Patterns Formulation of category-2 hypoglycemic Improved Traditional Medicines from selected Cameroonian medicinal plants: Mangifera indica, Persea americana and Ageratum conyzoides
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1