【Ivrea-Castellamonte医院43例急性阑尾炎及阑尾脓肿腹部脓液细菌学分析、好氧、厌氧菌分离及药敏分析】。

C Guasco, F Ronchetto, P Milani, E Stacchini, P G Pistono
{"title":"【Ivrea-Castellamonte医院43例急性阑尾炎及阑尾脓肿腹部脓液细菌学分析、好氧、厌氧菌分离及药敏分析】。","authors":"C Guasco,&nbsp;F Ronchetto,&nbsp;P Milani,&nbsp;E Stacchini,&nbsp;P G Pistono","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A retrospective study on the microbiology of abdominal pus from acute appendicitis or peritonitis was carried out by the authors. A total of 45 specimens were examined, 38 of them (84.4%) where found to be positive, of which 29 (76.3%) were polymicrobial and 9 (23.7%) were monomicrobial. The most represented species were Escherichia coli (28.4%), Bacteroides fragilis (7.8%), Streptococcus milleri (7.8%), Bacteroides oralis (3.9%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3.9%). The polymicrobial associations more represented include Bacteroidaceae, Enterobacteriaceae and streptococcus genus. The most active drugs in vitro were found to be Piperacillin and Chloramphenicol, Cephalosporin (cefotaxime, ceftriaxone and cefoxitin) showed a good capability of being active against isolated microorganisms although they were less effective when used against anaerobic microorganisms then aerobic ones. On the contrary, Rifampicin, Metronidazole and Clindamycin were found to be quite effective against the anaerobes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12722,"journal":{"name":"Giornale di batteriologia, virologia ed immunologia","volume":"84 1-12","pages":"77-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Bacteriology of abdominal pus in 43 cases of acute appendicitis and appendiceal abscess at the Ivrea-Castellamonte Hospital, isolation of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and drug sensitivity].\",\"authors\":\"C Guasco,&nbsp;F Ronchetto,&nbsp;P Milani,&nbsp;E Stacchini,&nbsp;P G Pistono\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A retrospective study on the microbiology of abdominal pus from acute appendicitis or peritonitis was carried out by the authors. A total of 45 specimens were examined, 38 of them (84.4%) where found to be positive, of which 29 (76.3%) were polymicrobial and 9 (23.7%) were monomicrobial. The most represented species were Escherichia coli (28.4%), Bacteroides fragilis (7.8%), Streptococcus milleri (7.8%), Bacteroides oralis (3.9%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3.9%). The polymicrobial associations more represented include Bacteroidaceae, Enterobacteriaceae and streptococcus genus. The most active drugs in vitro were found to be Piperacillin and Chloramphenicol, Cephalosporin (cefotaxime, ceftriaxone and cefoxitin) showed a good capability of being active against isolated microorganisms although they were less effective when used against anaerobic microorganisms then aerobic ones. On the contrary, Rifampicin, Metronidazole and Clindamycin were found to be quite effective against the anaerobes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Giornale di batteriologia, virologia ed immunologia\",\"volume\":\"84 1-12\",\"pages\":\"77-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Giornale di batteriologia, virologia ed immunologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale di batteriologia, virologia ed immunologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回顾性研究急性阑尾炎或腹膜炎腹腔脓液的微生物学。共检测标本45份,阳性38份(84.4%),其中多微生物29份(76.3%),单微生物9份(23.7%)。以大肠杆菌(28.4%)、脆弱拟杆菌(7.8%)、milleri链球菌(7.8%)、口腔拟杆菌(3.9%)和铜绿假单胞菌(3.9%)为代表。较有代表性的多微生物关联包括拟杆菌科、肠杆菌科和链球菌属。体外活性最高的药物是哌拉西林和氯霉素,头孢菌素(头孢噻肟、头孢曲松和头孢西丁)对分离的微生物具有良好的活性,但对厌氧微生物的活性低于好氧微生物。相反,利福平、甲硝唑和克林霉素对厌氧菌很有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Bacteriology of abdominal pus in 43 cases of acute appendicitis and appendiceal abscess at the Ivrea-Castellamonte Hospital, isolation of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and drug sensitivity].

A retrospective study on the microbiology of abdominal pus from acute appendicitis or peritonitis was carried out by the authors. A total of 45 specimens were examined, 38 of them (84.4%) where found to be positive, of which 29 (76.3%) were polymicrobial and 9 (23.7%) were monomicrobial. The most represented species were Escherichia coli (28.4%), Bacteroides fragilis (7.8%), Streptococcus milleri (7.8%), Bacteroides oralis (3.9%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3.9%). The polymicrobial associations more represented include Bacteroidaceae, Enterobacteriaceae and streptococcus genus. The most active drugs in vitro were found to be Piperacillin and Chloramphenicol, Cephalosporin (cefotaxime, ceftriaxone and cefoxitin) showed a good capability of being active against isolated microorganisms although they were less effective when used against anaerobic microorganisms then aerobic ones. On the contrary, Rifampicin, Metronidazole and Clindamycin were found to be quite effective against the anaerobes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Epidemiologic study of infectious diarrhea in infants]. [Protein p53 inhibits the activity of the enhancer of the immediate-early genes of murine cytomegalovirus]. [Prevalence of urinary infections caused by GBS in diabetic patients]. [Environmental pollution and infectious diseases. I. Isolation of a new serovar of the Salmonella genus, S.V 13.22:r: from a Periplaneta americana cockroach]. Detection of chlamydia trachomatis antigen using the direct immunofluorescence technique: a four year survey in Northwestern Greece.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1