适度分析:使用指数法来识别有失败风险的学生

Tim Rogers, C. Colvin, B. Chiera
{"title":"适度分析:使用指数法来识别有失败风险的学生","authors":"Tim Rogers, C. Colvin, B. Chiera","doi":"10.1145/2567574.2567629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regression is the tool of choice for developing predictive models of student risk of failure. However, the forecasting literature has demonstrated the predictive equivalence of much simpler methods. We directly compare one simple tabulation technique, the index method, to a linear multiple regression approach for identifying students at risk. The broader purpose is to explore the plausibility of a flexible method that is conducive to adoption and diffusion. In this respect this paper fits within the ambit of the modest computing agenda, and suggests the possibility of a modest analytics. We built both regression and index method models on 2011 student data and applied these to 2012 student data. The index method was comparable in terms of predictive accuracy of student risk. We suggest that the context specificity of learning environments makes the index method a promising tool for educators who want a situated risk algorithm that is flexible and adaptable.","PeriodicalId":178564,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modest analytics: using the index method to identify students at risk of failure\",\"authors\":\"Tim Rogers, C. Colvin, B. Chiera\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2567574.2567629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Regression is the tool of choice for developing predictive models of student risk of failure. However, the forecasting literature has demonstrated the predictive equivalence of much simpler methods. We directly compare one simple tabulation technique, the index method, to a linear multiple regression approach for identifying students at risk. The broader purpose is to explore the plausibility of a flexible method that is conducive to adoption and diffusion. In this respect this paper fits within the ambit of the modest computing agenda, and suggests the possibility of a modest analytics. We built both regression and index method models on 2011 student data and applied these to 2012 student data. The index method was comparable in terms of predictive accuracy of student risk. We suggest that the context specificity of learning environments makes the index method a promising tool for educators who want a situated risk algorithm that is flexible and adaptable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2567574.2567629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2567574.2567629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

回归是开发学生失败风险预测模型的首选工具。然而,预测文献已经证明了更简单方法的预测等效性。我们直接比较了一种简单的制表技术,即指数法,和一种线性多元回归方法来识别有风险的学生。更广泛的目的是探索一种有利于采用和传播的灵活方法的可行性。在这方面,本文符合适度计算议程的范围,并提出适度分析的可能性。我们对2011年的学生数据建立了回归模型和指数方法模型,并将其应用于2012年的学生数据。就学生风险的预测准确性而言,指数法具有可比性。我们认为,学习环境的语境特异性使指数方法成为教育工作者的一个有前途的工具,他们想要一个灵活和适应性强的情境风险算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modest analytics: using the index method to identify students at risk of failure
Regression is the tool of choice for developing predictive models of student risk of failure. However, the forecasting literature has demonstrated the predictive equivalence of much simpler methods. We directly compare one simple tabulation technique, the index method, to a linear multiple regression approach for identifying students at risk. The broader purpose is to explore the plausibility of a flexible method that is conducive to adoption and diffusion. In this respect this paper fits within the ambit of the modest computing agenda, and suggests the possibility of a modest analytics. We built both regression and index method models on 2011 student data and applied these to 2012 student data. The index method was comparable in terms of predictive accuracy of student risk. We suggest that the context specificity of learning environments makes the index method a promising tool for educators who want a situated risk algorithm that is flexible and adaptable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning analytics in CSCL with a focus on assessment: an exploratory study of activity theory-informed cluster analysis Temporal learning analytics for computer based testing Statistical discourse analysis of online discussions: informal cognition, social metacognition and knowledge creation The learning analytics & knowledge (LAK) data challenge 2014 Designing pedagogical interventions to support student use of learning analytics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1