结构诊断和管理(SDM)入路和肌筋膜松解(MFR)改善植足者足跟疼痛、踝关节活动范围和残疾的比较:一项随机临床试验

S. Akter, Mohammad Shahadat Hossain, K. Hossain, Z. Uddin, Mohammad Anwar Hossain, Foisal Alom, Md. Feroz Kabir, L. Walton, Veena Raigangar
{"title":"结构诊断和管理(SDM)入路和肌筋膜松解(MFR)改善植足者足跟疼痛、踝关节活动范围和残疾的比较:一项随机临床试验","authors":"S. Akter, Mohammad Shahadat Hossain, K. Hossain, Z. Uddin, Mohammad Anwar Hossain, Foisal Alom, Md. Feroz Kabir, L. Walton, Veena Raigangar","doi":"10.1101/2022.08.15.22278805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[Purpose] This study compared the effect of Structural Diagnosis and Management (SDM) approach over Myofascial Release (MFR) on gastrocnemii, soleus and plantar fascia in patients with plantar heel pain. [Subjects] Sixty-four (n=64) subjects, aged 30-60 years, with a diagnosis of plantar heel pain, plantar fasciitis or calcaneal spur by a physician and according to ICD-10. Participants were equally allocated to MFR (n=32) and SDM (n=32) group by hospital randomization and concealed allocation. [Methods] In this assessor blinded randomized clinical trial, the control group performed MFR (three tissue specific stretching techniques) and the experimental group performed 2 tissue-specific interventions utilizing the Structural Diagnosis and Management (SDM) concept for 12 sessions over a 4-week period. In addition, both groups received strengthening exercises and other conventional treatments. Pain, activity limitations and disability were assessed as primary outcomes utilizing the foot function index (FFI) and range of motion (ROM) of the ankle dorsiflexors and plantar flexors were measured with a universal goniometer. Secondary outcomes were measured using the Foot Ankle Disability Index (FADI) and 10-point manual muscle testing process for the ankle dorsiflexors and plantar flexors. [Result] Both MFR and SDM groups exhibited significant improvements from baseline in all outcome variables, including: pain, activity level, disability, range of motion and function after the 12-week intervention period (p<.05), The SDM group showed more significant improvements than MFR for FFI pain (p=.001), FFI activity (p=.009), FFI (p= .001) and FADI (p=.002). [Conclusion] MFR and SDM approaches are both effective to reduce pain, improving function, ankle range of motion, and reduce disability in plantar heel pain. However, the SDM approach is significantly superior (for reducing pain, improving function and reducing disability (p<.05).","PeriodicalId":281286,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Structural Diagnosis and Management (SDM) approach and Myofascial Release (MFR) for improving planter heel pain, ankle range of motion and disability: A Randomized Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"S. Akter, Mohammad Shahadat Hossain, K. Hossain, Z. Uddin, Mohammad Anwar Hossain, Foisal Alom, Md. Feroz Kabir, L. Walton, Veena Raigangar\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2022.08.15.22278805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"[Purpose] This study compared the effect of Structural Diagnosis and Management (SDM) approach over Myofascial Release (MFR) on gastrocnemii, soleus and plantar fascia in patients with plantar heel pain. [Subjects] Sixty-four (n=64) subjects, aged 30-60 years, with a diagnosis of plantar heel pain, plantar fasciitis or calcaneal spur by a physician and according to ICD-10. Participants were equally allocated to MFR (n=32) and SDM (n=32) group by hospital randomization and concealed allocation. [Methods] In this assessor blinded randomized clinical trial, the control group performed MFR (three tissue specific stretching techniques) and the experimental group performed 2 tissue-specific interventions utilizing the Structural Diagnosis and Management (SDM) concept for 12 sessions over a 4-week period. In addition, both groups received strengthening exercises and other conventional treatments. Pain, activity limitations and disability were assessed as primary outcomes utilizing the foot function index (FFI) and range of motion (ROM) of the ankle dorsiflexors and plantar flexors were measured with a universal goniometer. Secondary outcomes were measured using the Foot Ankle Disability Index (FADI) and 10-point manual muscle testing process for the ankle dorsiflexors and plantar flexors. [Result] Both MFR and SDM groups exhibited significant improvements from baseline in all outcome variables, including: pain, activity level, disability, range of motion and function after the 12-week intervention period (p<.05), The SDM group showed more significant improvements than MFR for FFI pain (p=.001), FFI activity (p=.009), FFI (p= .001) and FADI (p=.002). [Conclusion] MFR and SDM approaches are both effective to reduce pain, improving function, ankle range of motion, and reduce disability in plantar heel pain. However, the SDM approach is significantly superior (for reducing pain, improving function and reducing disability (p<.05).\",\"PeriodicalId\":281286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.15.22278805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.15.22278805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【目的】本研究比较结构诊断与管理(SDM)入路与肌筋膜松解(MFR)入路对足底跟痛患者腓肠肌、比目鱼肌和足底筋膜的影响。[受试者]64名(n=64)受试者,年龄30-60岁,经医生诊断为足底跟痛、足底筋膜炎或跟骨刺,并符合ICD-10。采用医院随机和隐式分配方法将参与者平均分配到MFR组(n=32)和SDM组(n=32)。[方法]在这项评估者盲法随机临床试验中,对照组进行MFR(三种组织特异性拉伸技术),实验组利用结构诊断和管理(SDM)概念进行2次组织特异性干预,为期4周,共12次。此外,两组都接受了强化锻炼和其他常规治疗。使用足功能指数(FFI)评估疼痛、活动受限和残疾作为主要结果,使用通用测角仪测量踝关节背屈肌和足底屈肌的活动范围(ROM)。次要结果采用足踝关节残疾指数(FADI)和踝关节背屈肌和足底屈肌的十点手动肌肉测试过程来测量。[结果]干预12周后,MFR组和SDM组在疼痛、活动水平、失能、活动范围和功能等所有结局变量均较基线有显著改善(p< 0.05),其中SDM组在FFI疼痛(p= 0.001)、FFI活动(p= 0.009)、FFI (p= 0.001)和FADI (p= 0.002)方面比MFR组改善更显著。[结论]MFR入路和SDM入路均能有效减轻足跟疼痛,改善功能和踝关节活动范围,减少足跟疼痛的致残性。然而,SDM方法在减轻疼痛、改善功能和减少残疾方面明显优于SDM方法(p< 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Structural Diagnosis and Management (SDM) approach and Myofascial Release (MFR) for improving planter heel pain, ankle range of motion and disability: A Randomized Clinical Trial
[Purpose] This study compared the effect of Structural Diagnosis and Management (SDM) approach over Myofascial Release (MFR) on gastrocnemii, soleus and plantar fascia in patients with plantar heel pain. [Subjects] Sixty-four (n=64) subjects, aged 30-60 years, with a diagnosis of plantar heel pain, plantar fasciitis or calcaneal spur by a physician and according to ICD-10. Participants were equally allocated to MFR (n=32) and SDM (n=32) group by hospital randomization and concealed allocation. [Methods] In this assessor blinded randomized clinical trial, the control group performed MFR (three tissue specific stretching techniques) and the experimental group performed 2 tissue-specific interventions utilizing the Structural Diagnosis and Management (SDM) concept for 12 sessions over a 4-week period. In addition, both groups received strengthening exercises and other conventional treatments. Pain, activity limitations and disability were assessed as primary outcomes utilizing the foot function index (FFI) and range of motion (ROM) of the ankle dorsiflexors and plantar flexors were measured with a universal goniometer. Secondary outcomes were measured using the Foot Ankle Disability Index (FADI) and 10-point manual muscle testing process for the ankle dorsiflexors and plantar flexors. [Result] Both MFR and SDM groups exhibited significant improvements from baseline in all outcome variables, including: pain, activity level, disability, range of motion and function after the 12-week intervention period (p<.05), The SDM group showed more significant improvements than MFR for FFI pain (p=.001), FFI activity (p=.009), FFI (p= .001) and FADI (p=.002). [Conclusion] MFR and SDM approaches are both effective to reduce pain, improving function, ankle range of motion, and reduce disability in plantar heel pain. However, the SDM approach is significantly superior (for reducing pain, improving function and reducing disability (p<.05).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recognition of a patient with neck autonomic dysfunction: findings from a rare case report of harlequin syndrome in direct access physiotherapy. Interrater reliability of the modified prone instability test for lumbar segmental instability in individuals with mechanical low back pain. Efficacy of Mulligan thoracic sustained natural apophyseal glides on sub-acromial pain in patients with sub-acromial impingement syndrome: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. McKenzie neck exercise versus cranio-cervical flexion exercise on strength and endurance of deep neck flexor muscles, pain, disability, and craniovertebral angle in individuals with chronic neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. Asymptomatic intraspinal epidermoid cyst in a 7-year-old male with juvenile idiopathic arthritis identified by an advanced physiotherapist practitioner: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1