研究设计:必要的拼贴

S. Fincher, J. Tenenberg, A. Robins
{"title":"研究设计:必要的拼贴","authors":"S. Fincher, J. Tenenberg, A. Robins","doi":"10.1145/2016911.2016919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we suggest that in order to advance, the field of computer science education needs to craft its own research methods, to augment the borrowing of \"traditional\" methods such as semi-structured interviews and surveys from other research traditions. Two example instruments used in our recent research are discussed. We adopt the metaphor of \"bricolage\" to characterise not only what researchers do, but to argue that this may be a necessary step towards developing theory.","PeriodicalId":268925,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research design: necessary bricolage\",\"authors\":\"S. Fincher, J. Tenenberg, A. Robins\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2016911.2016919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we suggest that in order to advance, the field of computer science education needs to craft its own research methods, to augment the borrowing of \\\"traditional\\\" methods such as semi-structured interviews and surveys from other research traditions. Two example instruments used in our recent research are discussed. We adopt the metaphor of \\\"bricolage\\\" to characterise not only what researchers do, but to argue that this may be a necessary step towards developing theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":268925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2016911.2016919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2016911.2016919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

在本文中,我们建议为了进步,计算机科学教育领域需要制定自己的研究方法,以增加从其他研究传统中借用“传统”方法,如半结构化访谈和调查。讨论了我们最近研究中使用的两个例子仪器。我们采用“拼凑”这个比喻,不仅是为了描述研究人员的工作,也是为了说明这可能是发展理论的必要步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Research design: necessary bricolage
In this paper we suggest that in order to advance, the field of computer science education needs to craft its own research methods, to augment the borrowing of "traditional" methods such as semi-structured interviews and surveys from other research traditions. Two example instruments used in our recent research are discussed. We adopt the metaphor of "bricolage" to characterise not only what researchers do, but to argue that this may be a necessary step towards developing theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CS majors' self-efficacy perceptions in CS1: results in light of social cognitive theory Personifying programming tool feedback improves novice programmers' learning How CS majors select a specialization Building professional identity as computer science teachers: supporting secondary computer science teachers through reflection and community building Predicting at-risk novice Java programmers through the analysis of online protocols
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1