2020年重要学术论文:对司法审查理解的五项贡献和对更具想象力研究的日益呼吁

J. Bell
{"title":"2020年重要学术论文:对司法审查理解的五项贡献和对更具想象力研究的日益呼吁","authors":"J. Bell","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2021.1930360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. What sorts of contributions can, and should, legal scholarship make to understanding of public law? This is a question that has generated a considerable body of thoughtful literature and at times lively debate among scholars in the UK and elsewhere. In this analysis I consider the question in light of a series of significant articles published in 2020. In addition to showcasing, in what I hope is an accessible and informative way, an array of exciting academic offerings, I show two things.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Significant Academic Articles in 2020: Five Contributions to Understanding and the Growing Plea for More Imaginative Study of Judicial Review\",\"authors\":\"J. Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2021.1930360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1. What sorts of contributions can, and should, legal scholarship make to understanding of public law? This is a question that has generated a considerable body of thoughtful literature and at times lively debate among scholars in the UK and elsewhere. In this analysis I consider the question in light of a series of significant articles published in 2020. In addition to showcasing, in what I hope is an accessible and informative way, an array of exciting academic offerings, I show two things.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2021.1930360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2021.1930360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1. 法律学术可以、也应该对理解公法做出什么样的贡献?这个问题已经产生了相当多的有思想的文献,有时也在英国和其他地方的学者之间引发了激烈的辩论。在此分析中,我根据2020年发表的一系列重要文章来考虑这个问题。除了展示一系列令人兴奋的学术成果之外,我还展示了两件事,我希望这是一种易于理解和信息丰富的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Significant Academic Articles in 2020: Five Contributions to Understanding and the Growing Plea for More Imaginative Study of Judicial Review
1. What sorts of contributions can, and should, legal scholarship make to understanding of public law? This is a question that has generated a considerable body of thoughtful literature and at times lively debate among scholars in the UK and elsewhere. In this analysis I consider the question in light of a series of significant articles published in 2020. In addition to showcasing, in what I hope is an accessible and informative way, an array of exciting academic offerings, I show two things.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Article 2 and Standards of Proof in Inquests: Unintelligible, Unclear, and Unpredictable? Of Codes and Common Law: The Approach to Apparent Bias in Local Government Committees Competing ‘Clear and Unambiguous’ Constructions: Darwall v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2023] EWCA Civ 927 and the Interpretation of Private Acts of Parliament The Curious Case of Boris’ Bishop: Did the First Catholic Prime Minister Fall Foul of s 18 of the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829? Information Law and Automated Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1