{"title":"2020年重要学术论文:对司法审查理解的五项贡献和对更具想象力研究的日益呼吁","authors":"J. Bell","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2021.1930360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. What sorts of contributions can, and should, legal scholarship make to understanding of public law? This is a question that has generated a considerable body of thoughtful literature and at times lively debate among scholars in the UK and elsewhere. In this analysis I consider the question in light of a series of significant articles published in 2020. In addition to showcasing, in what I hope is an accessible and informative way, an array of exciting academic offerings, I show two things.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Significant Academic Articles in 2020: Five Contributions to Understanding and the Growing Plea for More Imaginative Study of Judicial Review\",\"authors\":\"J. Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2021.1930360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1. What sorts of contributions can, and should, legal scholarship make to understanding of public law? This is a question that has generated a considerable body of thoughtful literature and at times lively debate among scholars in the UK and elsewhere. In this analysis I consider the question in light of a series of significant articles published in 2020. In addition to showcasing, in what I hope is an accessible and informative way, an array of exciting academic offerings, I show two things.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2021.1930360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2021.1930360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Significant Academic Articles in 2020: Five Contributions to Understanding and the Growing Plea for More Imaginative Study of Judicial Review
1. What sorts of contributions can, and should, legal scholarship make to understanding of public law? This is a question that has generated a considerable body of thoughtful literature and at times lively debate among scholars in the UK and elsewhere. In this analysis I consider the question in light of a series of significant articles published in 2020. In addition to showcasing, in what I hope is an accessible and informative way, an array of exciting academic offerings, I show two things.