[输注过滤器给药时妥布霉素、万古霉素和苯巴比妥浓度降低]。

H Böhrer, C H Zhang, C Krier
{"title":"[输注过滤器给药时妥布霉素、万古霉素和苯巴比妥浓度降低]。","authors":"H Böhrer,&nbsp;C H Zhang,&nbsp;C Krier","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess the loss of drugs to in-line filters, concentrations of tobramycin, vancomycin, and phenobarbitone were determined in vitro in samples recovered upstream and downstream of the filter. Binding of the drugs to new filters was higher than to used filters. With bolus administration, the concentrations of vancomycin and phenobarbitone were reduced by 1% when using old filters and by 4% when using new filters. Tobramycin concentrations were reduced by 7 and 12%, respectively. With continuous administration of the drugs, binding was highest during the first half hour. Differences between new and used filters were also seen with continuous administration: The cumulative loss was 5% higher with new than with old filters. This difference in binding between filters may stem from a saturation of free binding sites. Tobramycin showed the highest binding to the in-line filter. The extent of adsorption of tobramycin to intravenous filters may be considered moderately important in adult patients. The adsorption of vancomycin and phenobarbitone is not clinically relevant in adult patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":77545,"journal":{"name":"Infusionstherapie (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"18 2","pages":"96-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Decrease in the concentration of tobramycin, vancomycin and phenobarbital in administration with infusion filter].\",\"authors\":\"H Böhrer,&nbsp;C H Zhang,&nbsp;C Krier\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To assess the loss of drugs to in-line filters, concentrations of tobramycin, vancomycin, and phenobarbitone were determined in vitro in samples recovered upstream and downstream of the filter. Binding of the drugs to new filters was higher than to used filters. With bolus administration, the concentrations of vancomycin and phenobarbitone were reduced by 1% when using old filters and by 4% when using new filters. Tobramycin concentrations were reduced by 7 and 12%, respectively. With continuous administration of the drugs, binding was highest during the first half hour. Differences between new and used filters were also seen with continuous administration: The cumulative loss was 5% higher with new than with old filters. This difference in binding between filters may stem from a saturation of free binding sites. Tobramycin showed the highest binding to the in-line filter. The extent of adsorption of tobramycin to intravenous filters may be considered moderately important in adult patients. The adsorption of vancomycin and phenobarbitone is not clinically relevant in adult patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infusionstherapie (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"96-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infusionstherapie (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infusionstherapie (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了评估药物对在线过滤器的损失,在过滤器上游和下游回收的样品中体外测定妥布霉素、万古霉素和苯巴比妥的浓度。药物与新过滤器的结合率高于与旧过滤器的结合率。在给药时,使用旧过滤器时万古霉素和苯巴比妥的浓度降低1%,使用新过滤器时降低4%。妥布霉素浓度分别降低了7%和12%。连续给药后,结合在前半小时达到最高。新过滤器和使用过的过滤器之间的差异也可以在持续给药的情况下看到:新过滤器的累积损失比旧过滤器高5%。过滤器之间的这种结合差异可能源于自由结合位点的饱和。妥布霉素与在线过滤器的结合效果最好。妥布霉素对静脉过滤器的吸附程度在成人患者中可能被认为是中等重要的。万古霉素和苯巴比妥的吸附在成人患者中无临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Decrease in the concentration of tobramycin, vancomycin and phenobarbital in administration with infusion filter].

To assess the loss of drugs to in-line filters, concentrations of tobramycin, vancomycin, and phenobarbitone were determined in vitro in samples recovered upstream and downstream of the filter. Binding of the drugs to new filters was higher than to used filters. With bolus administration, the concentrations of vancomycin and phenobarbitone were reduced by 1% when using old filters and by 4% when using new filters. Tobramycin concentrations were reduced by 7 and 12%, respectively. With continuous administration of the drugs, binding was highest during the first half hour. Differences between new and used filters were also seen with continuous administration: The cumulative loss was 5% higher with new than with old filters. This difference in binding between filters may stem from a saturation of free binding sites. Tobramycin showed the highest binding to the in-line filter. The extent of adsorption of tobramycin to intravenous filters may be considered moderately important in adult patients. The adsorption of vancomycin and phenobarbitone is not clinically relevant in adult patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Effects of a defined infusion of 10% HAES 200/0.5 in the early phase of a septic syndrome on hemodynamic parameters]. [Tolerance of Haemofusin in hemodilution and volume substitution]. Posttraumatic hypocaloric parenteral nutrition--development and clinical application. [Are omega-3-fatty acids essential for newborn infants?]. [PEDINFUS computer program for total parenteral nutrition of children].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1