B型企业运动在商业和人权背景下的影响

Cindy S. Woods
{"title":"B型企业运动在商业和人权背景下的影响","authors":"Cindy S. Woods","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2840804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades, issues of corporate accountability and social responsibility have risen to the forefront in international debates. The U.N. Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (Guiding Principles), unanimously endorsed by the U.N. Human Rights Council in June 2011, authoritatively lay out the State duty to protect and the corporate responsibility to respect human rights. In an effort to operationalize the Guiding Principles, the U.N. Human Rights Council called on all States to develop National Action Plans (NAPs) for domestic implementation of the Guiding Principles. A key first step in the creation of a NAP is the completion of a national baseline assessment of the current frameworks and conditions affecting the protection and promotion of human rights by the State and businesses alike. With over thirty-five countries now committed to the creation of a NAP, it is increasingly important to evaluate existing corporate structures that claim to be socially and ethically motivated. The “B Corp” movement began in earnest in 2006, through the work of U.S.-based non-profit B Lab. A B Corp is a business certified by B Lab as a corporation committed to creating and supporting social and environmental rights. The B Corp movement has grown in size and stature, spreading into over thirty countries and garnering a reputation for excellence. Boosts to the movement have recently come from the certification of large multinational companies and the interest of businesses that followed. As the B Corp movement continues to proliferate, its technical and normative value within the business and human rights field merits close consideration. Through a comparative analysis between the B Corp certification requirements and the Guiding Principles, this paper seeks to answer the following questions: Do B Corps fulfill the Guiding Principles’ corporate responsibility standards to respect human rights? Are they a desirable normative shift in the business and human rights context?","PeriodicalId":437920,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Public Law - Corporations eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Implications of the B Corp Movement in the Business and Human Rights Context\",\"authors\":\"Cindy S. Woods\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2840804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent decades, issues of corporate accountability and social responsibility have risen to the forefront in international debates. The U.N. Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (Guiding Principles), unanimously endorsed by the U.N. Human Rights Council in June 2011, authoritatively lay out the State duty to protect and the corporate responsibility to respect human rights. In an effort to operationalize the Guiding Principles, the U.N. Human Rights Council called on all States to develop National Action Plans (NAPs) for domestic implementation of the Guiding Principles. A key first step in the creation of a NAP is the completion of a national baseline assessment of the current frameworks and conditions affecting the protection and promotion of human rights by the State and businesses alike. With over thirty-five countries now committed to the creation of a NAP, it is increasingly important to evaluate existing corporate structures that claim to be socially and ethically motivated. The “B Corp” movement began in earnest in 2006, through the work of U.S.-based non-profit B Lab. A B Corp is a business certified by B Lab as a corporation committed to creating and supporting social and environmental rights. The B Corp movement has grown in size and stature, spreading into over thirty countries and garnering a reputation for excellence. Boosts to the movement have recently come from the certification of large multinational companies and the interest of businesses that followed. As the B Corp movement continues to proliferate, its technical and normative value within the business and human rights field merits close consideration. Through a comparative analysis between the B Corp certification requirements and the Guiding Principles, this paper seeks to answer the following questions: Do B Corps fulfill the Guiding Principles’ corporate responsibility standards to respect human rights? Are they a desirable normative shift in the business and human rights context?\",\"PeriodicalId\":437920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Public Law - Corporations eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Public Law - Corporations eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2840804\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Public Law - Corporations eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2840804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

近几十年来,企业责任和社会责任问题已上升到国际辩论的前沿。联合国人权理事会于2011年6月一致通过的《联合国工商业与人权指导原则》(以下简称《指导原则》)权威性地规定了国家保护人权的义务和企业尊重人权的责任。为了使《指导原则》付诸实施,联合国人权理事会呼吁所有国家制定国家行动计划,以便在国内实施《指导原则》。建立国家行动计划的关键的第一步是完成对影响国家和企业保护和促进人权的现行框架和条件的国家基线评估。现在有超过35个国家承诺建立国家行动计划,因此对声称具有社会和道德动机的现有公司结构进行评估变得越来越重要。“互益企业”运动始于2006年,由总部位于美国的非营利机构“互益实验室”发起。B公司是由B实验室认证的企业,致力于创造和支持社会和环境权利。B型企业运动的规模和地位不断扩大,已蔓延到30多个国家,并赢得了卓越的声誉。最近,大型跨国公司的认证以及随之而来的企业利益推动了这一运动。随着B型企业运动的不断扩散,其在商业和人权领域的技术和规范价值值得密切关注。通过对B型企业认证要求与指导原则的比较分析,本文试图回答以下问题:B型企业是否符合指导原则中尊重人权的企业责任标准?在商业和人权方面,它们是一种理想的规范转变吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Implications of the B Corp Movement in the Business and Human Rights Context
In recent decades, issues of corporate accountability and social responsibility have risen to the forefront in international debates. The U.N. Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (Guiding Principles), unanimously endorsed by the U.N. Human Rights Council in June 2011, authoritatively lay out the State duty to protect and the corporate responsibility to respect human rights. In an effort to operationalize the Guiding Principles, the U.N. Human Rights Council called on all States to develop National Action Plans (NAPs) for domestic implementation of the Guiding Principles. A key first step in the creation of a NAP is the completion of a national baseline assessment of the current frameworks and conditions affecting the protection and promotion of human rights by the State and businesses alike. With over thirty-five countries now committed to the creation of a NAP, it is increasingly important to evaluate existing corporate structures that claim to be socially and ethically motivated. The “B Corp” movement began in earnest in 2006, through the work of U.S.-based non-profit B Lab. A B Corp is a business certified by B Lab as a corporation committed to creating and supporting social and environmental rights. The B Corp movement has grown in size and stature, spreading into over thirty countries and garnering a reputation for excellence. Boosts to the movement have recently come from the certification of large multinational companies and the interest of businesses that followed. As the B Corp movement continues to proliferate, its technical and normative value within the business and human rights field merits close consideration. Through a comparative analysis between the B Corp certification requirements and the Guiding Principles, this paper seeks to answer the following questions: Do B Corps fulfill the Guiding Principles’ corporate responsibility standards to respect human rights? Are they a desirable normative shift in the business and human rights context?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beware of Toothless Tigers: Institutionalizing Whistleblowing May Crowd Out Compliance Corporate Recognition: The Precarious Line Between Alienation and Flourishing Toward Fair and Sustainable Capitalism A Comprehensive Proposal to Help American Workers, Restore Fair Gainsharing between Employees and Shareholders, and Increase American Competitiveness by Reorienting Our Corporate Governance System toward Sustainable Long-Term Growth and Encouraging Investments Irremediable Impacts and Unaccountable Contributors: The Possibility of a Trust Fund for Victims to Remedy Large-Scale Human Rights Impacts Rethinking the Efficiency of the Common Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1