基于信念理论的人-车-环境系统驾驶员行为评价

Oussama Derbel, R. Landry
{"title":"基于信念理论的人-车-环境系统驾驶员行为评价","authors":"Oussama Derbel, R. Landry","doi":"10.1109/ICVES.2015.7396885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes to evaluate the driver safety by integrating the information of the Driver, the Vehicle and the Environment (DVE). The adopted strategy is composed of two fusion levels (local and global fusion levels) and use the Demptster-Shafer Theory (DST). The development of the Basic Probability Assignment (BPA) is based on the developed Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) (in the vehicle entity) and models. To reduce the complexity of the fusion problem in the Vehicle entity, the output membership function is fixed to the two developed FISs and the rule table is tuned relatively to this assumption. Application to the Canadian drivers in the city of Montreal shows the validity of the developed risk modes in case of one sample data and a driving mission. Comparison results between the Dempster-Shafer (DS) and the sixth version of the Proportional Conflict Redistribution (PCR6) combination rules show that the relevance of the PCR6 in case of high conflict between sources. Data related to the experimental test is recorded using the developed on-board data collector device that integrates an Inertial Navigation System (INS) and a Global Positioning System (GPS). Our approach assumes that the driving behavior is evaluated over the defined referential subsets which are the Low Risk (LR), Medium Risk (MR) and High Risk (HR), LE u MR and HR and the driving scores are the masses over these subsets.","PeriodicalId":325462,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Driver behavior assessment based on the belief theory in the driver-vehicle-environment system\",\"authors\":\"Oussama Derbel, R. Landry\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICVES.2015.7396885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper proposes to evaluate the driver safety by integrating the information of the Driver, the Vehicle and the Environment (DVE). The adopted strategy is composed of two fusion levels (local and global fusion levels) and use the Demptster-Shafer Theory (DST). The development of the Basic Probability Assignment (BPA) is based on the developed Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) (in the vehicle entity) and models. To reduce the complexity of the fusion problem in the Vehicle entity, the output membership function is fixed to the two developed FISs and the rule table is tuned relatively to this assumption. Application to the Canadian drivers in the city of Montreal shows the validity of the developed risk modes in case of one sample data and a driving mission. Comparison results between the Dempster-Shafer (DS) and the sixth version of the Proportional Conflict Redistribution (PCR6) combination rules show that the relevance of the PCR6 in case of high conflict between sources. Data related to the experimental test is recorded using the developed on-board data collector device that integrates an Inertial Navigation System (INS) and a Global Positioning System (GPS). Our approach assumes that the driving behavior is evaluated over the defined referential subsets which are the Low Risk (LR), Medium Risk (MR) and High Risk (HR), LE u MR and HR and the driving scores are the masses over these subsets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVES.2015.7396885\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVES.2015.7396885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文提出了将驾驶员、车辆和环境信息(DVE)相结合的驾驶员安全评价方法。所采用的策略由两个融合层(局部融合层和全局融合层)组成,并使用dempster - shafer理论(DST)。基本概率分配(BPA)的发展是基于已开发的模糊推理系统(FIS)(在车辆实体)和模型。为了降低Vehicle实体中融合问题的复杂性,将输出隶属函数固定在两个已开发的FISs上,并将规则表相对于该假设进行调整。对加拿大蒙特利尔市驾驶员的应用表明,在一个样本数据和一次驾驶任务的情况下,所开发的风险模型是有效的。Dempster-Shafer (DS)和第六版比例冲突再分配(PCR6)组合规则的比较结果表明,PCR6在源间高冲突情况下具有相关性。与实验测试相关的数据使用开发的机载数据采集器设备进行记录,该设备集成了惯性导航系统(INS)和全球定位系统(GPS)。我们的方法假设驾驶行为在定义的参考子集上进行评估,这些子集是低风险(LR),中风险(MR)和高风险(HR), LE u MR和HR,驾驶分数是这些子集上的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Driver behavior assessment based on the belief theory in the driver-vehicle-environment system
This paper proposes to evaluate the driver safety by integrating the information of the Driver, the Vehicle and the Environment (DVE). The adopted strategy is composed of two fusion levels (local and global fusion levels) and use the Demptster-Shafer Theory (DST). The development of the Basic Probability Assignment (BPA) is based on the developed Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) (in the vehicle entity) and models. To reduce the complexity of the fusion problem in the Vehicle entity, the output membership function is fixed to the two developed FISs and the rule table is tuned relatively to this assumption. Application to the Canadian drivers in the city of Montreal shows the validity of the developed risk modes in case of one sample data and a driving mission. Comparison results between the Dempster-Shafer (DS) and the sixth version of the Proportional Conflict Redistribution (PCR6) combination rules show that the relevance of the PCR6 in case of high conflict between sources. Data related to the experimental test is recorded using the developed on-board data collector device that integrates an Inertial Navigation System (INS) and a Global Positioning System (GPS). Our approach assumes that the driving behavior is evaluated over the defined referential subsets which are the Low Risk (LR), Medium Risk (MR) and High Risk (HR), LE u MR and HR and the driving scores are the masses over these subsets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A trial of navigation system using BLE beacon for sightseeing in traditional area of Nikko Super resolution of fisheye images captured by on-vehicle camera for visibility support Effects of errors in position- and navigation data on predictive vehicle operational strategy optimization Reduction of reflector code size by polarization film for infrared laser radar Evaluation of a low-overhead forwarding algorithm for platooning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1