“一个(保密)戒指统治所有人”:从好法工程和“每个医生”案例看对保密敏感信息和公开司法原则的思考

Natasha Jackson
{"title":"“一个(保密)戒指统治所有人”:从好法工程和“每个医生”案例看对保密敏感信息和公开司法原则的思考","authors":"Natasha Jackson","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2022.2084949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2. The Good Law Project and EveryDoctor’s high-profile challenge to the ‘VIP lane’ for awarding government contracts for the supply of personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic raised important ancillary issues regarding the release of confidential and commercially sensitive information into the public domain. The recent decision invites the opportunity to revisit well-established principles governing derogations from open justice to protect sensitive material, and offers fresh commentary on the proper procedure for seeking the release of information from a confidentiality ring.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘One (Confidentiality) Ring to Rule Them All’: Reflections on Confidential and Sensitive Information and the Open Justice Principle Following the Good Law Project and EveryDoctor Case\",\"authors\":\"Natasha Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2022.2084949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"2. The Good Law Project and EveryDoctor’s high-profile challenge to the ‘VIP lane’ for awarding government contracts for the supply of personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic raised important ancillary issues regarding the release of confidential and commercially sensitive information into the public domain. The recent decision invites the opportunity to revisit well-established principles governing derogations from open justice to protect sensitive material, and offers fresh commentary on the proper procedure for seeking the release of information from a confidentiality ring.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2084949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2084949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2. Good Law Project和EveryDoctor在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间高调挑战授予政府个人防护装备(PPE)供应合同的“VIP通道”,引发了将机密和商业敏感信息泄露到公共领域的重要附属问题。最近的决定使我们有机会重新审视为保护敏感材料而克减公开司法的既定原则,并就寻求从保密圈子中公布信息的适当程序提供了新的评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘One (Confidentiality) Ring to Rule Them All’: Reflections on Confidential and Sensitive Information and the Open Justice Principle Following the Good Law Project and EveryDoctor Case
2. The Good Law Project and EveryDoctor’s high-profile challenge to the ‘VIP lane’ for awarding government contracts for the supply of personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic raised important ancillary issues regarding the release of confidential and commercially sensitive information into the public domain. The recent decision invites the opportunity to revisit well-established principles governing derogations from open justice to protect sensitive material, and offers fresh commentary on the proper procedure for seeking the release of information from a confidentiality ring.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Article 2 and Standards of Proof in Inquests: Unintelligible, Unclear, and Unpredictable? Of Codes and Common Law: The Approach to Apparent Bias in Local Government Committees Competing ‘Clear and Unambiguous’ Constructions: Darwall v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2023] EWCA Civ 927 and the Interpretation of Private Acts of Parliament The Curious Case of Boris’ Bishop: Did the First Catholic Prime Minister Fall Foul of s 18 of the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829? Information Law and Automated Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1