K-ras在沙特结直肠癌肿瘤中的作用:频率、临床病理关联和临床结果

J. Zekri, A. Rizvi, J. Al-Maghrabi, B. Sadiq
{"title":"K-ras在沙特结直肠癌肿瘤中的作用:频率、临床病理关联和临床结果","authors":"J. Zekri, A. Rizvi, J. Al-Maghrabi, B. Sadiq","doi":"10.2174/1876820201205010022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: K-ras oncogene mutations are confirmed factor for lack of clinical benefit from antibodies target- ing EGFR in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Mutations are reported in 40% of CRC tumors in western patients. There is scarcity of data on population from Asia and the Middle East. Aims: This study investigates the frequency and impact of k-ras mutation and the association between clinico-pathological features and K-ras status in Saudi patients with CRC. Patients and Methods: Retrospective review of K-ras status, clinico-pathological characteristics and clinical outcome in 46 patients with CRC. Results: K-ras mutations were identified in 15/46 (32%) tumors, 87% at codon 12 and 13% at codon 13. Gender, site of tumor, stage at diagnosis, differentiation and lymphatic and vascular invasion were tested as potential risk predictors for K-ras status. Only gender was found to be a potential risk factor. Female gender compared to male posed higher signifi- cant chance of wild type status (RR=1.54, 65% CI: 1.07-2.2; P=0.034). K-ras status (mutant vs. wild) did not statistically significantly impact on clinical outcome as measured by development of relapsed disease (80% vs. 81%), median relapse free survival (17 vs. 11 months, P=0.256) and overall survival (not reached in both groups, P=0.59). Conclusion: This relatively small retrospective series shows that rate of K-ras mutation in Saudi patients with CRC is lower than reported in western Caucasian population but close to rates reported in neighboring Asian population. Muta- tions are less frequent in females. In these patients, K-ras mutation status did not significantly impact clinical outcome.","PeriodicalId":331708,"journal":{"name":"The Open Colorectal Cancer Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"K-ras in Colorectal Cancer Tumors From Saudi Patients: Frequency, Clinco-pathological Association and Clinical Outcome\",\"authors\":\"J. Zekri, A. Rizvi, J. Al-Maghrabi, B. Sadiq\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1876820201205010022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: K-ras oncogene mutations are confirmed factor for lack of clinical benefit from antibodies target- ing EGFR in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Mutations are reported in 40% of CRC tumors in western patients. There is scarcity of data on population from Asia and the Middle East. Aims: This study investigates the frequency and impact of k-ras mutation and the association between clinico-pathological features and K-ras status in Saudi patients with CRC. Patients and Methods: Retrospective review of K-ras status, clinico-pathological characteristics and clinical outcome in 46 patients with CRC. Results: K-ras mutations were identified in 15/46 (32%) tumors, 87% at codon 12 and 13% at codon 13. Gender, site of tumor, stage at diagnosis, differentiation and lymphatic and vascular invasion were tested as potential risk predictors for K-ras status. Only gender was found to be a potential risk factor. Female gender compared to male posed higher signifi- cant chance of wild type status (RR=1.54, 65% CI: 1.07-2.2; P=0.034). K-ras status (mutant vs. wild) did not statistically significantly impact on clinical outcome as measured by development of relapsed disease (80% vs. 81%), median relapse free survival (17 vs. 11 months, P=0.256) and overall survival (not reached in both groups, P=0.59). Conclusion: This relatively small retrospective series shows that rate of K-ras mutation in Saudi patients with CRC is lower than reported in western Caucasian population but close to rates reported in neighboring Asian population. Muta- tions are less frequent in females. In these patients, K-ras mutation status did not significantly impact clinical outcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Colorectal Cancer Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Colorectal Cancer Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876820201205010022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Colorectal Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876820201205010022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景:K-ras癌基因突变是结直肠癌(CRC)患者中靶向EGFR抗体缺乏临床获益的确定因素。据报道,在西方患者中,40%的CRC肿瘤存在突变。亚洲和中东地区的人口数据缺乏。目的:本研究探讨沙特结直肠癌患者k-ras突变的频率和影响,以及k-ras状态与临床病理特征的关系。患者与方法:回顾性分析46例结直肠癌患者的K-ras状态、临床病理特征及临床转归。结果:在15/46(32%)的肿瘤中发现K-ras突变,其中密码子12和13分别占87%和13%。性别、肿瘤部位、诊断分期、分化、淋巴和血管浸润作为K-ras状态的潜在危险预测因素。研究发现,只有性别是潜在的风险因素。与男性相比,女性出现野生型状态的几率更高(RR=1.54, 65% CI: 1.07-2.2;P = 0.034)。K-ras状态(突变型与野生型)对临床结果的影响无统计学意义,包括复发疾病的发生(80% vs 81%)、中位无复发生存期(17 vs 11个月,P=0.256)和总生存期(两组均未达到,P=0.59)。结论:这一相对较小的回顾性研究表明,沙特阿拉伯结直肠癌患者的K-ras突变率低于西方高加索人群的报道,但接近邻近亚洲人群的报道。突变在女性中较少发生。在这些患者中,K-ras突变状态对临床结果没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
K-ras in Colorectal Cancer Tumors From Saudi Patients: Frequency, Clinco-pathological Association and Clinical Outcome
Background: K-ras oncogene mutations are confirmed factor for lack of clinical benefit from antibodies target- ing EGFR in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Mutations are reported in 40% of CRC tumors in western patients. There is scarcity of data on population from Asia and the Middle East. Aims: This study investigates the frequency and impact of k-ras mutation and the association between clinico-pathological features and K-ras status in Saudi patients with CRC. Patients and Methods: Retrospective review of K-ras status, clinico-pathological characteristics and clinical outcome in 46 patients with CRC. Results: K-ras mutations were identified in 15/46 (32%) tumors, 87% at codon 12 and 13% at codon 13. Gender, site of tumor, stage at diagnosis, differentiation and lymphatic and vascular invasion were tested as potential risk predictors for K-ras status. Only gender was found to be a potential risk factor. Female gender compared to male posed higher signifi- cant chance of wild type status (RR=1.54, 65% CI: 1.07-2.2; P=0.034). K-ras status (mutant vs. wild) did not statistically significantly impact on clinical outcome as measured by development of relapsed disease (80% vs. 81%), median relapse free survival (17 vs. 11 months, P=0.256) and overall survival (not reached in both groups, P=0.59). Conclusion: This relatively small retrospective series shows that rate of K-ras mutation in Saudi patients with CRC is lower than reported in western Caucasian population but close to rates reported in neighboring Asian population. Muta- tions are less frequent in females. In these patients, K-ras mutation status did not significantly impact clinical outcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New trends in rectal cancer treatment Colorectal Cancer Causes and Treatments: A Minireview Association Between Thrombospondin-1, Angiogenesis Related Markers,and Extracellular Matrix Components with Colorectal Cancer Outcome Canadians' Attitudes and Awareness Towards Colorectal Cancer Screen-ing: Results of a National Survey Management of Gastro-intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors with Liver Metastases: A Comprehensive Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1