哪个依赖项被更新了?探索是谁改变了npm包中的依赖关系

Vittunyuta Maeprasart, Ayano Ikegami, R. Kula, Kenichi Matsumoto
{"title":"哪个依赖项被更新了?探索是谁改变了npm包中的依赖关系","authors":"Vittunyuta Maeprasart, Ayano Ikegami, R. Kula, Kenichi Matsumoto","doi":"10.1109/SNPD51163.2021.9704933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, software development increasingly depends on third-party library packages to reuse functionality and save the costs of building themselves. Since dependency is constantly evolving, developers struggle to update dependencies. In this work, we take the first exploration into the responsibility of updating a dependency. Analyzing 89,393 npm packages, we mine the repositories to understand who is the person responsible (i.e., dependency author) for the library update and whether or not the spread of responsibility of updating has an impact on what libraries will get updated. Our results show that 64.24% packages have only one dependency author who is responsible for the dependency. Furthermore, the number of dependency authors correlates with dependency changes, hinting that updating dependencies correlates with having more responsible developers. Lastly, we find that npm packages with just a single dependency author update different libraries compared to those with more dependency authors.","PeriodicalId":235370,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE/ACIS 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which Dependency was Updated? Exploring Who Changes Dependencies in npm packages\",\"authors\":\"Vittunyuta Maeprasart, Ayano Ikegami, R. Kula, Kenichi Matsumoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SNPD51163.2021.9704933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nowadays, software development increasingly depends on third-party library packages to reuse functionality and save the costs of building themselves. Since dependency is constantly evolving, developers struggle to update dependencies. In this work, we take the first exploration into the responsibility of updating a dependency. Analyzing 89,393 npm packages, we mine the repositories to understand who is the person responsible (i.e., dependency author) for the library update and whether or not the spread of responsibility of updating has an impact on what libraries will get updated. Our results show that 64.24% packages have only one dependency author who is responsible for the dependency. Furthermore, the number of dependency authors correlates with dependency changes, hinting that updating dependencies correlates with having more responsible developers. Lastly, we find that npm packages with just a single dependency author update different libraries compared to those with more dependency authors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":235370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE/ACIS 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE/ACIS 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SNPD51163.2021.9704933\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE/ACIS 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SNPD51163.2021.9704933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,软件开发越来越依赖于第三方库包来重用功能并节省构建自己的成本。由于依赖关系是不断发展的,开发人员很难更新依赖关系。在这项工作中,我们第一次探索了更新依赖项的责任。通过分析89,393个npm包,我们挖掘了这些库,以了解谁是库更新的责任人(即依赖作者),以及更新责任的分散是否会影响哪些库将被更新。我们的结果显示,64.24%的包只有一个依赖作者负责该依赖。此外,依赖作者的数量与依赖变更相关,这暗示更新依赖与拥有更多负责任的开发人员相关。最后,我们发现只有一个依赖作者的npm包比那些有更多依赖作者的npm包更新不同的库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Which Dependency was Updated? Exploring Who Changes Dependencies in npm packages
Nowadays, software development increasingly depends on third-party library packages to reuse functionality and save the costs of building themselves. Since dependency is constantly evolving, developers struggle to update dependencies. In this work, we take the first exploration into the responsibility of updating a dependency. Analyzing 89,393 npm packages, we mine the repositories to understand who is the person responsible (i.e., dependency author) for the library update and whether or not the spread of responsibility of updating has an impact on what libraries will get updated. Our results show that 64.24% packages have only one dependency author who is responsible for the dependency. Furthermore, the number of dependency authors correlates with dependency changes, hinting that updating dependencies correlates with having more responsible developers. Lastly, we find that npm packages with just a single dependency author update different libraries compared to those with more dependency authors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantum Annealing Approach for the Optimal Real-time Traffic Control using QUBO How to Enlighten Novice Users on Behavior of Machine Learning Models? Keynote Address: Deep Learning Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Its Past, Future, and Issues Web-based systems for inventory control in organizations: A Systematic Review Geometrical Schemes as Probabilistic and Entropic Tools to Estimate Duration and Peaks of Pandemic Waves
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1