结构失效分析

D. Blockley
{"title":"结构失效分析","authors":"D. Blockley","doi":"10.1680/IICEP.1977.3259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Part 1 a classification of basic types of structural failure is presented. This classification is expanded into a set of parameter statements which could be assessed subjectively in a prediction process. This process is intended to account for a structure failing due to causes other than stochastic variations in load and strength. The parameters are assessed for 23 major structural accidents and one existing structure and are analysed using a simple numerical interpretation. The accidents are ranked in their order of inevitability. Human errors of one form or another proved to be the dominant reasons for the failures considered. A simplified form of the proposed procedure for predicting the likelihood of structural accidents is outlined in Part II. This is then applied to the 24 accident parameter assessments made in Part I. The concept of fuzzy sets is used.","PeriodicalId":340765,"journal":{"name":"Building Bridges","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Structural Failures\",\"authors\":\"D. Blockley\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/IICEP.1977.3259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Part 1 a classification of basic types of structural failure is presented. This classification is expanded into a set of parameter statements which could be assessed subjectively in a prediction process. This process is intended to account for a structure failing due to causes other than stochastic variations in load and strength. The parameters are assessed for 23 major structural accidents and one existing structure and are analysed using a simple numerical interpretation. The accidents are ranked in their order of inevitability. Human errors of one form or another proved to be the dominant reasons for the failures considered. A simplified form of the proposed procedure for predicting the likelihood of structural accidents is outlined in Part II. This is then applied to the 24 accident parameter assessments made in Part I. The concept of fuzzy sets is used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Building Bridges\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1977-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Building Bridges\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/IICEP.1977.3259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Bridges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/IICEP.1977.3259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

第一部分对结构破坏的基本类型进行了分类。这种分类被扩展成一组参数陈述,这些参数陈述可以在预测过程中进行主观评估。这个过程的目的是解释结构的失败,由于载荷和强度的随机变化以外的原因。对23个重大结构事故和一个现有结构的参数进行了评估,并采用简单的数值解释进行了分析。这些事故是按其不可避免的程度排列的。这种或那种形式的人为错误被证明是所考虑的失败的主要原因。第二部分概述了预测结构事故可能性的拟议程序的简化形式。然后将其应用于第一部分所做的24个事故参数评估。使用模糊集的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of Structural Failures
In Part 1 a classification of basic types of structural failure is presented. This classification is expanded into a set of parameter statements which could be assessed subjectively in a prediction process. This process is intended to account for a structure failing due to causes other than stochastic variations in load and strength. The parameters are assessed for 23 major structural accidents and one existing structure and are analysed using a simple numerical interpretation. The accidents are ranked in their order of inevitability. Human errors of one form or another proved to be the dominant reasons for the failures considered. A simplified form of the proposed procedure for predicting the likelihood of structural accidents is outlined in Part II. This is then applied to the 24 accident parameter assessments made in Part I. The concept of fuzzy sets is used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epilogue: “The scent of a spring day” Multiplicity, paradox, and the creative self Facing the nonnegotiable “I wish you were my father!” The capacity to tolerate paradox
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1