基准最终一致性:从长期实验研究中吸取的教训

David Bermbach, S. Tai
{"title":"基准最终一致性:从长期实验研究中吸取的教训","authors":"David Bermbach, S. Tai","doi":"10.1109/IC2E.2014.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cloud storage services and NoSQL systems typically guarantee only Eventual Consistency. Knowing the degree of inconsistency increases transparency and comparability, it also eases application development. As every change to the system implementation, configuration, and deployment may affect the consistency guarantees of a storage system, long-term experiments are necessary to analyze how consistency behavior evolves over time. Building on our original publication on consistency benchmarking, we describe extensions to our benchmarking approach and report the surprising development of consistency behavior in Amazon S3 over the last two years. Based on our findings, we argue that consistency behavior should be monitored continuously and that deployment decisions should be reconsidered periodically. For this purpose, we propose a new method called Indirect Consistency Monitoring which allows to track all application-relevant changes in consistency behavior in a much more cost-efficient way compared to continuously running consistency benchmarks.","PeriodicalId":273902,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking Eventual Consistency: Lessons Learned from Long-Term Experimental Studies\",\"authors\":\"David Bermbach, S. Tai\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IC2E.2014.37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cloud storage services and NoSQL systems typically guarantee only Eventual Consistency. Knowing the degree of inconsistency increases transparency and comparability, it also eases application development. As every change to the system implementation, configuration, and deployment may affect the consistency guarantees of a storage system, long-term experiments are necessary to analyze how consistency behavior evolves over time. Building on our original publication on consistency benchmarking, we describe extensions to our benchmarking approach and report the surprising development of consistency behavior in Amazon S3 over the last two years. Based on our findings, we argue that consistency behavior should be monitored continuously and that deployment decisions should be reconsidered periodically. For this purpose, we propose a new method called Indirect Consistency Monitoring which allows to track all application-relevant changes in consistency behavior in a much more cost-efficient way compared to continuously running consistency benchmarks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC2E.2014.37\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC2E.2014.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

摘要

云存储服务和NoSQL系统通常只保证最终一致性。了解不一致的程度可以增加透明度和可比性,还可以简化应用程序开发。由于对系统实现、配置和部署的每次更改都可能影响存储系统的一致性保证,因此有必要进行长期实验,以分析一致性行为如何随时间演变。在我们关于一致性基准测试的原始出版物的基础上,我们描述了我们的基准测试方法的扩展,并报告了过去两年中Amazon S3中一致性行为的惊人发展。基于我们的发现,我们认为应该持续监控一致性行为,并且应该定期重新考虑部署决策。为此,我们提出了一种称为间接一致性监控的新方法,与连续运行一致性基准测试相比,它允许以一种更经济有效的方式跟踪所有与应用程序相关的一致性行为变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benchmarking Eventual Consistency: Lessons Learned from Long-Term Experimental Studies
Cloud storage services and NoSQL systems typically guarantee only Eventual Consistency. Knowing the degree of inconsistency increases transparency and comparability, it also eases application development. As every change to the system implementation, configuration, and deployment may affect the consistency guarantees of a storage system, long-term experiments are necessary to analyze how consistency behavior evolves over time. Building on our original publication on consistency benchmarking, we describe extensions to our benchmarking approach and report the surprising development of consistency behavior in Amazon S3 over the last two years. Based on our findings, we argue that consistency behavior should be monitored continuously and that deployment decisions should be reconsidered periodically. For this purpose, we propose a new method called Indirect Consistency Monitoring which allows to track all application-relevant changes in consistency behavior in a much more cost-efficient way compared to continuously running consistency benchmarks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combining Declarative and Imperative Cloud Application Provisioning Based on TOSCA Splicing MPLS and OpenFlow Tunnels Based on SDN Paradigm CoMoT -- A Platform-as-a-Service for Elasticity in the Cloud A Verification Platform for SDN-Enabled Applications Extraction of Bridges from High Resolution Remote Sensing Image Based on Topology Modeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1