经济繁荣的无限赤字融资:他们在哪里错了凯恩斯的赤字支出?

S. Javed
{"title":"经济繁荣的无限赤字融资:他们在哪里错了凯恩斯的赤字支出?","authors":"S. Javed","doi":"10.4197/islec.32-1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent wave of recommendations of unlimited credit creation to\nfinance government expenditures to achieve economic growth and prosperity seems to\nbe grounded in misunderstanding Keynes’s countercyclical fiscal policy. Keynes’s\ndeficit spending denotes the stimulus geared towards increasing private investment as\nopposed to big government spending boosting consumption. Taking Japan as a case\nstudy, I showcase that deficit financing meeting Keynesian preconditions, including a\nsound monetary system, well-developed financial markets, and lower/zero interest rate,\nmay not lead to raising growth and lowering public debts as the proponents predict. I\nmaintain that unlimited credit expansion to the public sector in consumption-based\neconomies, which is the general case for developing countries, is most likely to\ngenerate inflation while leaving the economy’s productivity unchanged.","PeriodicalId":127865,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy: Budget","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limitless Deficit Financing for Economic Prosperity: Where They Got the Keynes’s Deficit Spending Wrong?\",\"authors\":\"S. Javed\",\"doi\":\"10.4197/islec.32-1.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recent wave of recommendations of unlimited credit creation to\\nfinance government expenditures to achieve economic growth and prosperity seems to\\nbe grounded in misunderstanding Keynes’s countercyclical fiscal policy. Keynes’s\\ndeficit spending denotes the stimulus geared towards increasing private investment as\\nopposed to big government spending boosting consumption. Taking Japan as a case\\nstudy, I showcase that deficit financing meeting Keynesian preconditions, including a\\nsound monetary system, well-developed financial markets, and lower/zero interest rate,\\nmay not lead to raising growth and lowering public debts as the proponents predict. I\\nmaintain that unlimited credit expansion to the public sector in consumption-based\\neconomies, which is the general case for developing countries, is most likely to\\ngenerate inflation while leaving the economy’s productivity unchanged.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Economy: Budget\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Economy: Budget\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4197/islec.32-1.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy: Budget","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4197/islec.32-1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近一波建议无限制地创造信贷,为政府支出提供资金,以实现经济增长和繁荣,这似乎是基于对凯恩斯反周期财政政策的误解。凯恩斯的赤字支出指的是旨在增加私人投资的刺激措施,而不是旨在促进消费的政府大支出。以日本为例,我展示了满足凯恩斯前提条件的赤字融资,包括健全的货币体系、发达的金融市场和低/零利率,可能不会像支持者预测的那样促进增长和降低公共债务。在以消费为基础的经济体中,对公共部门的无限制信贷扩张(这是发展中国家的普遍情况)最有可能在保持经济生产力不变的情况下产生通货膨胀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Limitless Deficit Financing for Economic Prosperity: Where They Got the Keynes’s Deficit Spending Wrong?
The recent wave of recommendations of unlimited credit creation to finance government expenditures to achieve economic growth and prosperity seems to be grounded in misunderstanding Keynes’s countercyclical fiscal policy. Keynes’s deficit spending denotes the stimulus geared towards increasing private investment as opposed to big government spending boosting consumption. Taking Japan as a case study, I showcase that deficit financing meeting Keynesian preconditions, including a sound monetary system, well-developed financial markets, and lower/zero interest rate, may not lead to raising growth and lowering public debts as the proponents predict. I maintain that unlimited credit expansion to the public sector in consumption-based economies, which is the general case for developing countries, is most likely to generate inflation while leaving the economy’s productivity unchanged.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Presidents in Deficit: Are there Historical Rewards to Deficits? A Comparative Assessment for 2022 State Budget in Azerbaijan Selective Default Expectations Is Metallica Fractal? A Case Study European Safe Assets: Past, Present, and Future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1