关于精神疾病和遵守《美国残疾人法案》的州心理学执照问题。

J. Boyd, Bruce Graunke, F. Frese, James T. R. Jones, J. Adkins, R. Bassman
{"title":"关于精神疾病和遵守《美国残疾人法案》的州心理学执照问题。","authors":"J. Boyd, Bruce Graunke, F. Frese, James T. R. Jones, J. Adkins, R. Bassman","doi":"10.1037/ORT0000177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"State licensing boards have obligations to protect the public from impaired professionals and to protect the rights of professionals applying for licensure. Competently functioning professionals who have or have had a mental health diagnosis or are being treated for a mental health condition should not be screened out, according to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A review of case law shows applicable precedents from discrimination among physicians and lawyers but not, to date, among psychologists. An examination of psychology licensure application materials from all 50 states and the District of Columbia revealed that some states, particularly Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Missouri, Montana, and New Hampshire, include language that might screen out professionals with lived experience who are currently functioning competently. For comparison, we review a sample of licensure applications for physicians and lawyers and find a similar pattern. Five of the present authors offer ourselves and other published authors as examples of competent licensed psychologists who have lived with mental illnesses. We conclude with recommendations for more inclusive language and protection of confidentiality. (PsycINFO Database Record","PeriodicalId":409666,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of orthopsychiatry","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State psychology licensure questions about mental illness and compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.\",\"authors\":\"J. Boyd, Bruce Graunke, F. Frese, James T. R. Jones, J. Adkins, R. Bassman\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ORT0000177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"State licensing boards have obligations to protect the public from impaired professionals and to protect the rights of professionals applying for licensure. Competently functioning professionals who have or have had a mental health diagnosis or are being treated for a mental health condition should not be screened out, according to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A review of case law shows applicable precedents from discrimination among physicians and lawyers but not, to date, among psychologists. An examination of psychology licensure application materials from all 50 states and the District of Columbia revealed that some states, particularly Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Missouri, Montana, and New Hampshire, include language that might screen out professionals with lived experience who are currently functioning competently. For comparison, we review a sample of licensure applications for physicians and lawyers and find a similar pattern. Five of the present authors offer ourselves and other published authors as examples of competent licensed psychologists who have lived with mental illnesses. We conclude with recommendations for more inclusive language and protection of confidentiality. (PsycINFO Database Record\",\"PeriodicalId\":409666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of orthopsychiatry\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of orthopsychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ORT0000177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of orthopsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ORT0000177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

国家颁发执照委员会有义务保护公众免受专业人员的伤害,并保护申请执照的专业人员的权利。根据《美国残疾人法案》(ADA)的规定,那些有或曾经有过精神健康诊断或正在接受精神健康治疗的称职的专业人员不应该被筛选出去。对判例法的回顾显示了医生和律师之间歧视的适用先例,但迄今为止,心理学家之间的歧视还没有。对所有50个州和哥伦比亚特区的心理学执照申请材料进行的一项检查显示,一些州,特别是阿拉斯加、阿肯色州、科罗拉多州、佛罗里达州、佐治亚州、肯塔基州、密苏里州、蒙大拿州和新罕布什尔州,包括可能筛选出具有实际经验的专业人士的语言。为了进行比较,我们回顾了医生和律师的执照申请样本,发现了类似的模式。本文的五位作者以我们自己和其他已发表文章的作者为例,说明他们都是有精神疾病经历的合格持牌心理学家。最后,我们提出了更具包容性的语言和保密保护的建议。(PsycINFO数据库记录
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
State psychology licensure questions about mental illness and compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
State licensing boards have obligations to protect the public from impaired professionals and to protect the rights of professionals applying for licensure. Competently functioning professionals who have or have had a mental health diagnosis or are being treated for a mental health condition should not be screened out, according to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A review of case law shows applicable precedents from discrimination among physicians and lawyers but not, to date, among psychologists. An examination of psychology licensure application materials from all 50 states and the District of Columbia revealed that some states, particularly Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Missouri, Montana, and New Hampshire, include language that might screen out professionals with lived experience who are currently functioning competently. For comparison, we review a sample of licensure applications for physicians and lawyers and find a similar pattern. Five of the present authors offer ourselves and other published authors as examples of competent licensed psychologists who have lived with mental illnesses. We conclude with recommendations for more inclusive language and protection of confidentiality. (PsycINFO Database Record
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the role of residential care in care leavers' personal development and life outcomes. Socially excluded young adult Israeli women's social activism: A new approach to promoting well-being. Stepping into the future of behavioral health: Opportunities, challenges, and possibilities. Child behavioral problems and parental adjustment: Family, interparental, and parent-child processes as simultaneous mediators. Online xenophobia and mental health among Venezuelan migrant youth in Colombia: The interplay with "in-person" discrimination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1