叙事实践中干预保真度的评估指标:对白色脚手架概念的启发式回顾(2007)

Chitat Chan, Hoyee Au-Yeung, William Chiu, Carina Tsang, H. Tsui
{"title":"叙事实践中干预保真度的评估指标:对白色脚手架概念的启发式回顾(2007)","authors":"Chitat Chan, Hoyee Au-Yeung, William Chiu, Carina Tsang, H. Tsui","doi":"10.1521/jsyt.2020.39.3.77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Narrative practice (NP) is a psychotherapy approach that helps people identify subordinated storylines and reimagine their lives. The concept of intervention fidelity (IF) refers to the extent to which an intervention is implemented as planned, and it is an essential component in rigorous intervention research. However, it is challenging to assess IF in NP, because NP cannot be simply seen as standardized procedures. This study used the idea of scaffolding suggested in White (2007) to analyze White's conversations and develop a method assessing whether his conversations adhered to his stated principles. Results revealed potential indicators, such as progression, synchrony, and proportion of conversation utterances. These indicators are far from comprehensive and they do not represent any absolute standards. Nonetheless, they open the discussion about how we can rationalize intervention fidelity in NP.","PeriodicalId":245719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systemic Therapies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indicators for Assessing Intervention Fidelity in Narrative Practice: A Heuristic Review of the Concept of Scaffolding in White (2007)\",\"authors\":\"Chitat Chan, Hoyee Au-Yeung, William Chiu, Carina Tsang, H. Tsui\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/jsyt.2020.39.3.77\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Narrative practice (NP) is a psychotherapy approach that helps people identify subordinated storylines and reimagine their lives. The concept of intervention fidelity (IF) refers to the extent to which an intervention is implemented as planned, and it is an essential component in rigorous intervention research. However, it is challenging to assess IF in NP, because NP cannot be simply seen as standardized procedures. This study used the idea of scaffolding suggested in White (2007) to analyze White's conversations and develop a method assessing whether his conversations adhered to his stated principles. Results revealed potential indicators, such as progression, synchrony, and proportion of conversation utterances. These indicators are far from comprehensive and they do not represent any absolute standards. Nonetheless, they open the discussion about how we can rationalize intervention fidelity in NP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":245719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Systemic Therapies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Systemic Therapies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.2020.39.3.77\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systemic Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.2020.39.3.77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

叙事实践(NP)是一种心理治疗方法,帮助人们识别从属的故事情节,并重新想象他们的生活。干预保真度(IF)的概念是指干预措施按计划实施的程度,是严格干预研究的重要组成部分。然而,评估NP中的IF是具有挑战性的,因为NP不能简单地视为标准化程序。本研究使用了White(2007)提出的脚手架的想法来分析White的对话,并开发了一种方法来评估他的对话是否遵守了他所陈述的原则。结果揭示了潜在的指标,如进展、同步和对话话语的比例。这些指标远非全面,也不代表任何绝对标准。尽管如此,他们开启了关于我们如何合理化NP干预忠实度的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Indicators for Assessing Intervention Fidelity in Narrative Practice: A Heuristic Review of the Concept of Scaffolding in White (2007)
Narrative practice (NP) is a psychotherapy approach that helps people identify subordinated storylines and reimagine their lives. The concept of intervention fidelity (IF) refers to the extent to which an intervention is implemented as planned, and it is an essential component in rigorous intervention research. However, it is challenging to assess IF in NP, because NP cannot be simply seen as standardized procedures. This study used the idea of scaffolding suggested in White (2007) to analyze White's conversations and develop a method assessing whether his conversations adhered to his stated principles. Results revealed potential indicators, such as progression, synchrony, and proportion of conversation utterances. These indicators are far from comprehensive and they do not represent any absolute standards. Nonetheless, they open the discussion about how we can rationalize intervention fidelity in NP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Supporting Physicians During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cumulative Feminist Autoethnography Racism and Friends: The Relevance of Racial Literacy in Clinical Spaces An Introductory Guide to Skillful Therapist Positioning Introduction: An Ethical Stance for Justice-Doing in Community Work and Therapy Using Micro-analyzing Tools to Investigate Therapist Skills in Emotionally Focused Couples Therapy With Couples in a High-Conflict Relationship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1