PROTEÇÃO DO GRUPO VULNERVÁVEL LGBTI EM FACE DA DISCRIMINAÇÃO: A RELEVÂNCIA DE DOCUMENTOS INTERNACIONAIS PARA A AUTORIZAÇÃO DA DOAÇÃO DE SANGUE POR ESTAS PESSOAS, NO BRASIL

The Supreme Federal Court (STF), in the headquarters of the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI) no 5543 / DF, in the exercise of its countermajoritarian function, recognized the unconstitutionality of the rules that 1 Doutor em Direito Constitucional pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais UFMG. Professor Adjunto na Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto UFOP e IBMEC-BH. E-mail: alexandre@ufop.edu.br. Currículo Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/2877462978948032. 2 Mestrando em Direito Constitucional Público e Teoria Política pelo Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito da Universidade de Fortaleza. Premiado com a Bolsa Yolanda Queiroz. Mérito acadêmico 2019.2. Graduado em Direito pelo Centro de Ciências Jurídicas da Universidade de Fortaleza. E-mail: matheusamaro15@gmail.com. Currículo Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/7530486832086965. restricted blood donation to the vulnerable LGBTI group (lesbians, gay, bisexual, transsexual, intersex, etc.) for considering them unjustifiably discriminatory. Through reflexes, he built permissiveness for the realization of the altruistic act by these people, supported by international human rights law. Thus, bibliographical and documentary research was developed, using a hypothetical-deductive method, to unveil the importance of treaties for the international protection of human rights of individuals who do not conform to the heteronormative and cisgender standard, while at the same time analyzing compliance or not. this manifestation of the STF with the Chenery doctrine. In the end, it was glimpsed that the decision opened space for a more frequent application of international documents by the Government (which includes all constituted powers) in order to strengthen the protection of the human person. It was also found that the aforementioned judicial construction did not repel the Chenery doctrine, since it did not fall within its scope. In this understanding, the STF's performance in promoting substantial equality is legitimate.