{"title":"后记","authors":"Pablo Kalmanovitz","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198790259.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have seen in the preceding chapters how the modern laws of war evolved historically from largely self-enforcing customary norms and practices in European inter-state warfare. In Vattel’s account of regular war, belligerent states comply to the extent that they take it to be in their best interest to do so. The most important interest is to keep the destructiveness of war within certain limits, but also important is the anticipation of onerous consequences from legal breaches, either in the form of direct reprisals or from developing a reputation for savagery that could be harmful in the future....","PeriodicalId":341693,"journal":{"name":"The Laws of War in International Thought","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epilogue\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Kalmanovitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198790259.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We have seen in the preceding chapters how the modern laws of war evolved historically from largely self-enforcing customary norms and practices in European inter-state warfare. In Vattel’s account of regular war, belligerent states comply to the extent that they take it to be in their best interest to do so. The most important interest is to keep the destructiveness of war within certain limits, but also important is the anticipation of onerous consequences from legal breaches, either in the form of direct reprisals or from developing a reputation for savagery that could be harmful in the future....\",\"PeriodicalId\":341693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Laws of War in International Thought\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Laws of War in International Thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198790259.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Laws of War in International Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198790259.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在前面的章节中,我们已经看到现代战争法是如何从欧洲国家间战争中基本上自我执行的习惯规范和实践演变而来的。在Vattel对常规战争的描述中,交战国遵守的程度是他们认为这样做最符合他们的利益。最重要的利益是将战争的破坏性保持在一定的范围内,但同样重要的是预期违反法律的严重后果,要么以直接报复的形式出现,要么以将来可能有害的野蛮行为的名声发展....
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Epilogue
We have seen in the preceding chapters how the modern laws of war evolved historically from largely self-enforcing customary norms and practices in European inter-state warfare. In Vattel’s account of regular war, belligerent states comply to the extent that they take it to be in their best interest to do so. The most important interest is to keep the destructiveness of war within certain limits, but also important is the anticipation of onerous consequences from legal breaches, either in the form of direct reprisals or from developing a reputation for savagery that could be harmful in the future....
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epilogue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1