{"title":"不切除腔静脉后段的切开修复腔静脉后段输尿管:单中心8例的结果","authors":"F. Kızılay, S. Kalemci, A. Şimşir, B. Semerci","doi":"10.5505/aot.2019.95866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Retrocaval ureter (RU) is a rare congenital anomaly characterized by the passage of the ureter through the posterior of the vena cava. We aimed to present the data of 8 cases treated with open surgical repair without excision of the retrocaval segment. METHODS: Eight patients who were operated with the diagnosis of RU in our clinic between 2005-2018 were included in the study. Demographic data, periand postoperative data of the patients were recorded and evaluated. In addition, imaging modalities were recorded. Preand postoperative values of T1⁄2 values in dynamic scintigraphy were compared. All patients underwent open ureterouretereral anostomosis without excision of the retrocaval segment. SPSS 22.0 was used for statistical analysis and p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Five patients were male and 3 were female. The mean age was 36.2 years (25-48). The mean operation time was 64 minutes (58-92). Six patients (75%) presented with flank pain. The mean hospitalization duration was 2.32 days. In the postoperative period, all patients underwent computed tomography-urography and dynamic and static renal scintigraphy with nuclear medicine study. There was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative static scintigraphy values (p = 0.741), but dynamic renal scintigraphy difference was significant (T1⁄2 was 25.7 min. preoperatively and 14.4 min. postoperatively, p = 0.016). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Re-anostomosis performed for the retrocaval ureter without any excision of the retrocaval segment yields successful results with minimal postoperative morbidity and short hospital stay.","PeriodicalId":435847,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica Turcica","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open Surgical Repair of Retrocaval Ureter Without Excision of Retrocaval Segment: Results of 8 Cases in a Single-Center\",\"authors\":\"F. Kızılay, S. Kalemci, A. Şimşir, B. Semerci\",\"doi\":\"10.5505/aot.2019.95866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: Retrocaval ureter (RU) is a rare congenital anomaly characterized by the passage of the ureter through the posterior of the vena cava. We aimed to present the data of 8 cases treated with open surgical repair without excision of the retrocaval segment. METHODS: Eight patients who were operated with the diagnosis of RU in our clinic between 2005-2018 were included in the study. Demographic data, periand postoperative data of the patients were recorded and evaluated. In addition, imaging modalities were recorded. Preand postoperative values of T1⁄2 values in dynamic scintigraphy were compared. All patients underwent open ureterouretereral anostomosis without excision of the retrocaval segment. SPSS 22.0 was used for statistical analysis and p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Five patients were male and 3 were female. The mean age was 36.2 years (25-48). The mean operation time was 64 minutes (58-92). Six patients (75%) presented with flank pain. The mean hospitalization duration was 2.32 days. In the postoperative period, all patients underwent computed tomography-urography and dynamic and static renal scintigraphy with nuclear medicine study. There was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative static scintigraphy values (p = 0.741), but dynamic renal scintigraphy difference was significant (T1⁄2 was 25.7 min. preoperatively and 14.4 min. postoperatively, p = 0.016). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Re-anostomosis performed for the retrocaval ureter without any excision of the retrocaval segment yields successful results with minimal postoperative morbidity and short hospital stay.\",\"PeriodicalId\":435847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oncologica Turcica\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oncologica Turcica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5505/aot.2019.95866\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica Turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5505/aot.2019.95866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Open Surgical Repair of Retrocaval Ureter Without Excision of Retrocaval Segment: Results of 8 Cases in a Single-Center
INTRODUCTION: Retrocaval ureter (RU) is a rare congenital anomaly characterized by the passage of the ureter through the posterior of the vena cava. We aimed to present the data of 8 cases treated with open surgical repair without excision of the retrocaval segment. METHODS: Eight patients who were operated with the diagnosis of RU in our clinic between 2005-2018 were included in the study. Demographic data, periand postoperative data of the patients were recorded and evaluated. In addition, imaging modalities were recorded. Preand postoperative values of T1⁄2 values in dynamic scintigraphy were compared. All patients underwent open ureterouretereral anostomosis without excision of the retrocaval segment. SPSS 22.0 was used for statistical analysis and p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Five patients were male and 3 were female. The mean age was 36.2 years (25-48). The mean operation time was 64 minutes (58-92). Six patients (75%) presented with flank pain. The mean hospitalization duration was 2.32 days. In the postoperative period, all patients underwent computed tomography-urography and dynamic and static renal scintigraphy with nuclear medicine study. There was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative static scintigraphy values (p = 0.741), but dynamic renal scintigraphy difference was significant (T1⁄2 was 25.7 min. preoperatively and 14.4 min. postoperatively, p = 0.016). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Re-anostomosis performed for the retrocaval ureter without any excision of the retrocaval segment yields successful results with minimal postoperative morbidity and short hospital stay.