基于模糊推理的软实时系统非抢占周期任务调度

M. Sabeghi, Mahmoud Naghibzadeh, T. Taghavi
{"title":"基于模糊推理的软实时系统非抢占周期任务调度","authors":"M. Sabeghi, Mahmoud Naghibzadeh, T. Taghavi","doi":"10.1109/ISORC.2006.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many scheduling algorithms have been studied to guarantee the time constraints of real-time processes. Scheduling decision of these algorithms is usually based on parameters which are assumed to be crisp. However, in many circumstances the values of these parameters are vague. The vagueness of parameters suggests that we make use of fuzzy logic to decide in what order the requests should be executed to better utilize the system and as a result reduce the chance of a request being missed. We have proposed a new fuzzy algorithm called highest fuzzy priority first. The performance of this algorithm is compared with the well-known earliest deadline first algorithm through simulation. For both algorithms, tasks are considered to be non-preemptable. Simulation results show that this fuzzy approach outperforms the earliest deadline first has algorithm in that it decreases the number of missed deadlines and serves more important tasks better","PeriodicalId":212174,"journal":{"name":"Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC'06)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scheduling non-preemptive periodic tasks in soft real-time systems using fuzzy inference\",\"authors\":\"M. Sabeghi, Mahmoud Naghibzadeh, T. Taghavi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISORC.2006.70\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many scheduling algorithms have been studied to guarantee the time constraints of real-time processes. Scheduling decision of these algorithms is usually based on parameters which are assumed to be crisp. However, in many circumstances the values of these parameters are vague. The vagueness of parameters suggests that we make use of fuzzy logic to decide in what order the requests should be executed to better utilize the system and as a result reduce the chance of a request being missed. We have proposed a new fuzzy algorithm called highest fuzzy priority first. The performance of this algorithm is compared with the well-known earliest deadline first algorithm through simulation. For both algorithms, tasks are considered to be non-preemptable. Simulation results show that this fuzzy approach outperforms the earliest deadline first has algorithm in that it decreases the number of missed deadlines and serves more important tasks better\",\"PeriodicalId\":212174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC'06)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISORC.2006.70\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISORC.2006.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

为了保证实时进程的时间约束,人们研究了许多调度算法。这些算法的调度决策通常是基于假设参数是清晰的。然而,在许多情况下,这些参数的值是模糊的。参数的模糊性建议我们使用模糊逻辑来决定请求的执行顺序,以更好地利用系统,从而减少请求被错过的机会。我们提出了一种新的模糊算法,称为最高模糊优先级。通过仿真,将该算法的性能与著名的最早截止日期优先算法进行了比较。对于这两种算法,任务都被认为是不可抢占的。仿真结果表明,该模糊方法比最早截止日期优先算法更有效地减少了错过截止日期的次数,更好地服务于更重要的任务
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scheduling non-preemptive periodic tasks in soft real-time systems using fuzzy inference
Many scheduling algorithms have been studied to guarantee the time constraints of real-time processes. Scheduling decision of these algorithms is usually based on parameters which are assumed to be crisp. However, in many circumstances the values of these parameters are vague. The vagueness of parameters suggests that we make use of fuzzy logic to decide in what order the requests should be executed to better utilize the system and as a result reduce the chance of a request being missed. We have proposed a new fuzzy algorithm called highest fuzzy priority first. The performance of this algorithm is compared with the well-known earliest deadline first algorithm through simulation. For both algorithms, tasks are considered to be non-preemptable. Simulation results show that this fuzzy approach outperforms the earliest deadline first has algorithm in that it decreases the number of missed deadlines and serves more important tasks better
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modeling behavioral patterns of concurrent objects using Petri nets A diagnostic framework for integrated time-triggered architectures Analyzing the memory management semantic and requirements of the real-time specification of Java JSR-0000001 Towards a real-time implementation of the ECMA Common Language Infrastructure Getting more flexible scheduling in the RTSJ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1