{"title":"理解高频波动率指数的跳跃","authors":"Inna Khagleeva","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2277324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I conduct a comprehensive nonparametric study of volatility jumps and leverage effect by examining high-frequency data on the VIX and S&P 500 from 1992 to 2010. I argue that the VIX data prior to 1998 are too noisy to provide a reliable inference. After 1999, the dataset is cleaner but still controversial. More specifically, the high-frequency dynamics of the VIX jumps challenges the assumptions of commonly used stochastic volatility jump-diffusion models. I explain this phenomenon by hypothesizing that most jump-like movements in the VIX are \"pseudo-jumps\" i.e., these jumps are large but temporary deviations from fundamental values.","PeriodicalId":273058,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Model Construction & Estimation (Topic)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Jumps in the High-Frequency VIX\",\"authors\":\"Inna Khagleeva\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2277324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I conduct a comprehensive nonparametric study of volatility jumps and leverage effect by examining high-frequency data on the VIX and S&P 500 from 1992 to 2010. I argue that the VIX data prior to 1998 are too noisy to provide a reliable inference. After 1999, the dataset is cleaner but still controversial. More specifically, the high-frequency dynamics of the VIX jumps challenges the assumptions of commonly used stochastic volatility jump-diffusion models. I explain this phenomenon by hypothesizing that most jump-like movements in the VIX are \\\"pseudo-jumps\\\" i.e., these jumps are large but temporary deviations from fundamental values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Model Construction & Estimation (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Model Construction & Estimation (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2277324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Model Construction & Estimation (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2277324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
I conduct a comprehensive nonparametric study of volatility jumps and leverage effect by examining high-frequency data on the VIX and S&P 500 from 1992 to 2010. I argue that the VIX data prior to 1998 are too noisy to provide a reliable inference. After 1999, the dataset is cleaner but still controversial. More specifically, the high-frequency dynamics of the VIX jumps challenges the assumptions of commonly used stochastic volatility jump-diffusion models. I explain this phenomenon by hypothesizing that most jump-like movements in the VIX are "pseudo-jumps" i.e., these jumps are large but temporary deviations from fundamental values.