Windows操作系统下第三方杀毒软件的必要性再评估

Faisal A. Garba, Rosemary M. Dima, A. B. Isa, A. Bello, A. Aliyu, F. U. Yarima, S. A. Ibrahim
{"title":"Windows操作系统下第三方杀毒软件的必要性再评估","authors":"Faisal A. Garba, Rosemary M. Dima, A. B. Isa, A. Bello, A. Aliyu, F. U. Yarima, S. A. Ibrahim","doi":"10.54216/jcim.090105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a general assumption that one must purchase costly antivirus software products to defend one’s computer system. However, if one is using the Windows Operating System, the question that arises is whether one needs to purchase antivirus software or not. The Windows operating system has a market share of 31.15% behind Android with a market share of 41.56% worldwide amongst all the operating systems. This makes Windows a prime target for hacking due to its large user base. Windows 11 a recent upgrade to the Windows operating system has claimed to have taken its security to the next level. There is a need to evaluate the capability of the Windows 11 default security against antivirus evasion tools. This research investigated the capability of Windows 11 default security by evaluating it against 6 free and open-source antivirus evasion tools: TheFatRat, Venom, Paygen, Defeat Defender, Inflate and Defender Disabler. The criteria for the selection of the antivirus evasion tools were free and open source and recently updated. A research lab was set up using Oracle VirtualBox where two guest machines were installed: a Windows 11 victim machine and the Kali Linux attacking machine. The antivirus evasion tools were installed on the Kali Linux machine one at a time to generate a malware and pass it to the victim machine. Apache web server was used in holding the malicious sample for the Windows 11 victim machine to download. A score of 2 was awarded to an antivirus evasion tool that successfully evaded the Windows 11 security and created a reverse connection with the attacking machine. From the research results: TheFatRat had a 25% evasion score, Venom had 20% while the rest had a 0% evasion score. None of the payloads generated with the antivirus evasion tools was able to create a connection with the Kali Linux attacking machine. The research results imply that the default Windows 11 security is good enough to stand on its own. A third-party antivirus solution will only supplement the already good protection capability of Windows 11.","PeriodicalId":169383,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cybersecurity and Information Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-Evaluating the Necessity of Third-Party Antivirus Software on Windows Operating System\",\"authors\":\"Faisal A. Garba, Rosemary M. Dima, A. B. Isa, A. Bello, A. Aliyu, F. U. Yarima, S. A. Ibrahim\",\"doi\":\"10.54216/jcim.090105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a general assumption that one must purchase costly antivirus software products to defend one’s computer system. However, if one is using the Windows Operating System, the question that arises is whether one needs to purchase antivirus software or not. The Windows operating system has a market share of 31.15% behind Android with a market share of 41.56% worldwide amongst all the operating systems. This makes Windows a prime target for hacking due to its large user base. Windows 11 a recent upgrade to the Windows operating system has claimed to have taken its security to the next level. There is a need to evaluate the capability of the Windows 11 default security against antivirus evasion tools. This research investigated the capability of Windows 11 default security by evaluating it against 6 free and open-source antivirus evasion tools: TheFatRat, Venom, Paygen, Defeat Defender, Inflate and Defender Disabler. The criteria for the selection of the antivirus evasion tools were free and open source and recently updated. A research lab was set up using Oracle VirtualBox where two guest machines were installed: a Windows 11 victim machine and the Kali Linux attacking machine. The antivirus evasion tools were installed on the Kali Linux machine one at a time to generate a malware and pass it to the victim machine. Apache web server was used in holding the malicious sample for the Windows 11 victim machine to download. A score of 2 was awarded to an antivirus evasion tool that successfully evaded the Windows 11 security and created a reverse connection with the attacking machine. From the research results: TheFatRat had a 25% evasion score, Venom had 20% while the rest had a 0% evasion score. None of the payloads generated with the antivirus evasion tools was able to create a connection with the Kali Linux attacking machine. The research results imply that the default Windows 11 security is good enough to stand on its own. A third-party antivirus solution will only supplement the already good protection capability of Windows 11.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cybersecurity and Information Management\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cybersecurity and Information Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54216/jcim.090105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cybersecurity and Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54216/jcim.090105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

有一个普遍的假设,一个人必须购买昂贵的杀毒软件产品来保护自己的计算机系统。但是,如果使用的是Windows操作系统,那么问题是是否需要购买杀毒软件。Windows操作系统在全球所有操作系统中的市场份额为41.56%,落后于Android的市场份额为31.15%。由于其庞大的用户群,这使得Windows成为黑客攻击的首要目标。最近升级到Windows操作系统的Windows 11声称已经将其安全性提升到一个新的水平。有必要评估Windows 11默认安全性对防病毒规避工具的能力。本研究通过对6种免费开源反病毒规避工具(TheFatRat、Venom、Paygen、Defeat Defender、Inflate和Defender Disabler)进行评估,调查了Windows 11默认安全性的能力。选择反病毒逃避工具的标准是免费、开源和最近更新的。使用Oracle VirtualBox建立了一个研究实验室,其中安装了两台来宾机器:一台Windows 11受害者机器和Kali Linux攻击机器。反病毒逃避工具一次一个地安装在Kali Linux机器上,以生成恶意软件并将其传递到受害机器。使用Apache web服务器保存恶意样本,供Windows 11受害机器下载。一款防病毒规避工具获得了2分,该工具成功规避了Windows 11的安全,并与攻击机器建立了反向连接。从研究结果来看:the fatrat有25%的闪避得分,Venom有20%的闪避得分,而其余的都是0%的闪避得分。反病毒规避工具生成的有效负载都无法与Kali Linux攻击机器建立连接。研究结果表明,默认的Windows 11安全性足够好,可以独立运行。第三方防病毒解决方案只会补充Windows 11已经很好的保护功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Re-Evaluating the Necessity of Third-Party Antivirus Software on Windows Operating System
There is a general assumption that one must purchase costly antivirus software products to defend one’s computer system. However, if one is using the Windows Operating System, the question that arises is whether one needs to purchase antivirus software or not. The Windows operating system has a market share of 31.15% behind Android with a market share of 41.56% worldwide amongst all the operating systems. This makes Windows a prime target for hacking due to its large user base. Windows 11 a recent upgrade to the Windows operating system has claimed to have taken its security to the next level. There is a need to evaluate the capability of the Windows 11 default security against antivirus evasion tools. This research investigated the capability of Windows 11 default security by evaluating it against 6 free and open-source antivirus evasion tools: TheFatRat, Venom, Paygen, Defeat Defender, Inflate and Defender Disabler. The criteria for the selection of the antivirus evasion tools were free and open source and recently updated. A research lab was set up using Oracle VirtualBox where two guest machines were installed: a Windows 11 victim machine and the Kali Linux attacking machine. The antivirus evasion tools were installed on the Kali Linux machine one at a time to generate a malware and pass it to the victim machine. Apache web server was used in holding the malicious sample for the Windows 11 victim machine to download. A score of 2 was awarded to an antivirus evasion tool that successfully evaded the Windows 11 security and created a reverse connection with the attacking machine. From the research results: TheFatRat had a 25% evasion score, Venom had 20% while the rest had a 0% evasion score. None of the payloads generated with the antivirus evasion tools was able to create a connection with the Kali Linux attacking machine. The research results imply that the default Windows 11 security is good enough to stand on its own. A third-party antivirus solution will only supplement the already good protection capability of Windows 11.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Privacy Preserving Healthcare Data Sharing on Blockchain Design, development and performance estimation of 110 kW kinetic heating simulation facilities for material studies–Phase I Impact of Cyber Attack on Saudi Aramco Image Classification Based On CNN: A Survey An Artificial Intelligence-based Intrusion Detection System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1