入侵检测中的n-grams:异常检测与分类

Christian Wressnegger, Guido Schwenk, Dan Arp, Konrad Rieck
{"title":"入侵检测中的n-grams:异常检测与分类","authors":"Christian Wressnegger, Guido Schwenk, Dan Arp, Konrad Rieck","doi":"10.1145/2517312.2517316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detection methods based on n-gram models have been widely studied for the identification of attacks and malicious software. These methods usually build on one of two learning schemes: anomaly detection, where a model of normality is constructed from n-grams, or classification, where a discrimination between benign and malicious n-grams is learned. Although successful in many security domains, previous work falls short of explaining why a particular scheme is used and more importantly what renders one favorable over the other for a given type of data. In this paper we provide a close look on n-gram models for intrusion detection. We specifically study anomaly detection and classification using n-grams and develop criteria for data being used in one or the other scheme. Furthermore, we apply these criteria in the scope of web intrusion detection and empirically validate their effectiveness with different learning-based detection methods for client-side and service-side attacks.","PeriodicalId":422398,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2013 ACM workshop on Artificial intelligence and security","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"95","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A close look on n-grams in intrusion detection: anomaly detection vs. classification\",\"authors\":\"Christian Wressnegger, Guido Schwenk, Dan Arp, Konrad Rieck\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2517312.2517316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Detection methods based on n-gram models have been widely studied for the identification of attacks and malicious software. These methods usually build on one of two learning schemes: anomaly detection, where a model of normality is constructed from n-grams, or classification, where a discrimination between benign and malicious n-grams is learned. Although successful in many security domains, previous work falls short of explaining why a particular scheme is used and more importantly what renders one favorable over the other for a given type of data. In this paper we provide a close look on n-gram models for intrusion detection. We specifically study anomaly detection and classification using n-grams and develop criteria for data being used in one or the other scheme. Furthermore, we apply these criteria in the scope of web intrusion detection and empirically validate their effectiveness with different learning-based detection methods for client-side and service-side attacks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2013 ACM workshop on Artificial intelligence and security\",\"volume\":\"128 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"95\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2013 ACM workshop on Artificial intelligence and security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2517312.2517316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2013 ACM workshop on Artificial intelligence and security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2517312.2517316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 95

摘要

基于n-gram模型的检测方法在识别攻击和恶意软件方面得到了广泛的研究。这些方法通常建立在两种学习方案之一的基础上:异常检测,其中从n-图中构建正态性模型,或分类,其中学习良性和恶意n-图之间的区分。尽管在许多安全领域取得了成功,但以前的工作未能解释为什么使用特定的方案,更重要的是,对于给定类型的数据,是什么使一种方案优于另一种方案。在本文中,我们对入侵检测的n-gram模型进行了深入的研究。我们专门研究了使用n-图的异常检测和分类,并为一种或另一种方案中使用的数据制定了标准。此外,我们将这些标准应用于web入侵检测的范围,并使用不同的基于学习的检测方法对客户端和服务端攻击进行经验验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A close look on n-grams in intrusion detection: anomaly detection vs. classification
Detection methods based on n-gram models have been widely studied for the identification of attacks and malicious software. These methods usually build on one of two learning schemes: anomaly detection, where a model of normality is constructed from n-grams, or classification, where a discrimination between benign and malicious n-grams is learned. Although successful in many security domains, previous work falls short of explaining why a particular scheme is used and more importantly what renders one favorable over the other for a given type of data. In this paper we provide a close look on n-gram models for intrusion detection. We specifically study anomaly detection and classification using n-grams and develop criteria for data being used in one or the other scheme. Furthermore, we apply these criteria in the scope of web intrusion detection and empirically validate their effectiveness with different learning-based detection methods for client-side and service-side attacks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Off the beaten path: machine learning for offensive security Is data clustering in adversarial settings secure? Session details: Adversarial learning What you want is not what you get: predicting sharing policies for text-based content on facebook Session details: Security in societal computing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1