亚洲区域建筑

Asia's Regional Architecture Pub Date : 2019-04-02 DOI:10.11126/stanford/9781503608443.001.0001

Andrew Yeo

{"title":"亚洲区域建筑","authors":"Andrew Yeo","doi":"10.11126/stanford/9781503608443.001.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter presents a new theoretical framework for understanding the development of Asia’s regional architecture. Drawing on historical institutionalism, the chapter discusses how endogenous processes of change, as well as mechanisms of continuity, have produced a layering of bilateral, trilateral, mini-lateral, and multilateral institutions in Asia. The chapter also discusses the limitations of theories of rational institutional design, and the role ideas and institutions play in shaping actors’ choices.","PeriodicalId":186848,"journal":{"name":"Asia's Regional Architecture","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asia's Regional Architecture\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Yeo\",\"doi\":\"10.11126/stanford/9781503608443.001.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter presents a new theoretical framework for understanding the development of Asia’s regional architecture. Drawing on historical institutionalism, the chapter discusses how endogenous processes of change, as well as mechanisms of continuity, have produced a layering of bilateral, trilateral, mini-lateral, and multilateral institutions in Asia. The chapter also discusses the limitations of theories of rational institutional design, and the role ideas and institutions play in shaping actors’ choices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia's Regional Architecture\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia's Regional Architecture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9781503608443.001.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia's Regional Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9781503608443.001.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

本章为理解亚洲区域架构的发展提供了一个新的理论框架。本章以历史制度主义为基础，讨论了内生的变化过程以及连续性机制如何在亚洲产生了双边、三边、小多边和多边机构的分层。本章还讨论了理性制度设计理论的局限性，以及思想和制度在塑造行动者选择方面所起的作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Asia's Regional Architecture

This chapter presents a new theoretical framework for understanding the development of Asia’s regional architecture. Drawing on historical institutionalism, the chapter discusses how endogenous processes of change, as well as mechanisms of continuity, have produced a layering of bilateral, trilateral, mini-lateral, and multilateral institutions in Asia. The chapter also discusses the limitations of theories of rational institutional design, and the role ideas and institutions play in shaping actors’ choices.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助