解决悖论

J. Weichselgartner, J. Sendzimir
{"title":"解决悖论","authors":"J. Weichselgartner, J. Sendzimir","doi":"10.1659/0276-4741(2004)024[0004:RTP]2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Recent disaster statistics reflect an alarming trend of increasing losses from natural disasters. Typically, the insurance industry, scientific experts, and thus the media, refer to such “external” factors as population increase, the potential for damage in hazard-prone areas, and land use and climate change as the primary causes of this trend. Although these factors increase vulnerability to natural disasters, we argue that “internal” factors such as disaster-related science and policy are also responsible for the inability to stem or reverse the upward trend in disaster damage. The paradox of concurrent increases in economic loss and disaster-related research raises questions about the approaches and tools used in hazard assessment and disaster management. This in turn raises the possibility that progress is being blocked by fundamental conceptual barriers, in addition to profound changes in environmental and social processes, neither of which are adequately being addressed. We conclude with some thought-provoking suggestions for addressing problems in disaster management.","PeriodicalId":178361,"journal":{"name":"Entrepreneurs and SMEs in Rwanda","volume":"8 39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resolving the Paradox\",\"authors\":\"J. Weichselgartner, J. Sendzimir\",\"doi\":\"10.1659/0276-4741(2004)024[0004:RTP]2.0.CO;2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Recent disaster statistics reflect an alarming trend of increasing losses from natural disasters. Typically, the insurance industry, scientific experts, and thus the media, refer to such “external” factors as population increase, the potential for damage in hazard-prone areas, and land use and climate change as the primary causes of this trend. Although these factors increase vulnerability to natural disasters, we argue that “internal” factors such as disaster-related science and policy are also responsible for the inability to stem or reverse the upward trend in disaster damage. The paradox of concurrent increases in economic loss and disaster-related research raises questions about the approaches and tools used in hazard assessment and disaster management. This in turn raises the possibility that progress is being blocked by fundamental conceptual barriers, in addition to profound changes in environmental and social processes, neither of which are adequately being addressed. We conclude with some thought-provoking suggestions for addressing problems in disaster management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Entrepreneurs and SMEs in Rwanda\",\"volume\":\"8 39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Entrepreneurs and SMEs in Rwanda\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1659/0276-4741(2004)024[0004:RTP]2.0.CO;2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entrepreneurs and SMEs in Rwanda","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1659/0276-4741(2004)024[0004:RTP]2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

最近的灾害统计数据反映了自然灾害造成的损失日益增加的惊人趋势。通常,保险行业、科学专家以及媒体将人口增长、灾害易发地区的潜在破坏、土地利用和气候变化等“外部”因素作为这一趋势的主要原因。尽管这些因素增加了对自然灾害的脆弱性,但我们认为,“内部”因素,如与灾害有关的科学和政策,也对无法阻止或扭转灾害损害的上升趋势负有责任。经济损失和与灾害有关的研究同时增加的矛盾现象使人们对灾害评估和灾害管理中使用的方法和工具产生了疑问。这反过来又增加了一种可能性,即除了环境和社会进程的深刻变化之外,进展还受到基本概念障碍的阻碍,而这两个障碍都没有得到充分解决。最后,我们为解决灾害管理问题提出了一些发人深省的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Resolving the Paradox
Abstract Recent disaster statistics reflect an alarming trend of increasing losses from natural disasters. Typically, the insurance industry, scientific experts, and thus the media, refer to such “external” factors as population increase, the potential for damage in hazard-prone areas, and land use and climate change as the primary causes of this trend. Although these factors increase vulnerability to natural disasters, we argue that “internal” factors such as disaster-related science and policy are also responsible for the inability to stem or reverse the upward trend in disaster damage. The paradox of concurrent increases in economic loss and disaster-related research raises questions about the approaches and tools used in hazard assessment and disaster management. This in turn raises the possibility that progress is being blocked by fundamental conceptual barriers, in addition to profound changes in environmental and social processes, neither of which are adequately being addressed. We conclude with some thought-provoking suggestions for addressing problems in disaster management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Resolving the Paradox Aspiring Entrepreneurs and Psychological Traits Successful Entrepreneurs and Psychological Traits Searching for the Proto-Entrepreneur Successful Entrepreneurs, Finance and Planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1